Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T11:49:53.608Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Herbicide Effects on Weed Control and Shoot Growth of Young Apple (Malus sylvestris) and Peach (Prunus persica) Trees

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Chester L. Foy
Affiliation:
Dep. Plant Pathol., Physiol. and Weed Sci., Virginia Polytech. Inst. State Univ., Blacksburg, VA 24061
Susan B. Harrison
Affiliation:
Dep. Plant Pathol., Physiol. and Weed Sci., Virginia Polytech. Inst. State Univ., Blacksburg, VA 24061
Harold L. Witt
Affiliation:
Dep. Plant Pathol., Physiol. and Weed Sci., Virginia Polytech. Inst. State Univ., Blacksburg, VA 24061

Abstract

Field experiments were conducted at two locations in Virginia to evaluate the following herbicides: alachlor, diphenamid, diuron, metolachlor, napropamide, norflurazon, oryzalin, oxyfluorfen, paraquat, pendimethalin, and simazine. One experiment involved newly-transplanted apple trees; the others, three in apple and one in peach trees, involved one-year-old trees. Treatments were applied in the spring (mid-April to early-May). Control of annual weed species was excellent with several treatments. A broader spectrum of weeds was controlled in several instances when the preemergence herbicides were used in combinations. Perennial species, particularly broadleaf species and johnsongrass, were released when annual species were suppressed by the herbicides. A rye cover crop in nontreated plots suppressed the growth of weeds. New shoot growth of newly-transplanted apple trees was increased with 3 of 20 herbicide treatments and scion circumference was increased with 11 of 20 herbicide treatments compared to the nontreated control. Growth of one-year-old apple trees was not affected. Scion circumference of one-year-old peach trees was increased with 25 of 33 herbicide treatments.

Type
Research
Copyright
Copyright © 1994 Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Arnold, M. E. and Aldrich, J. H. 1980. Herbicidal effects on peach seedling growth and weed control. Hortic. Sci. 15:293294.Google Scholar
2. Barnes, J. P. and Putnam, A. R. 1983. Rye residues contribute weed suppression in no-tillage cropping systems. J. Chem. Ecol. 8:10451057.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Barnes, J. P., Putnam, A. R., and Burke, B. A. 1986. Allelopathic activity of rye (Secale cereale L.). p. 271289 in Putnam, A. R. and Tang, Chung Shin, eds. The Science of Allelopathy. Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
4. Barnes, J. P. and Putnam, A. R. 1986. Evidence for allelopathy by residues and aqueous extract of rye (Secale cereale L.). Weed Sci. 34:384390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Barnes, J. P., Putnam, A. R., Burke, B. A., and Aasen, A. J. 1987. Isolation of allelochemicals in rye herbage. Phytochemistry 5:13851390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Baxter, P. and Newman, B. J. 1971. Effect of herbicides and nitrogen on growth and yield of young apple trees in permanent pasture. Aust. J. Exp. Agric. Husb. 11:105111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Derr, J. F., Foy, C. L., and Monks, C. D. 1993. Chemical control of weeds. p. 8094 in 1993 Spay Bulletin for Commercial Tree Fruit Growers. Va. Coop. Ext. Serv., Publ. 456-419.Google Scholar
8. Harrison, S. B. 1983. Vegetation management effects on fruit trees. M.S. thesis, Virginia Polytech. Inst. State Univ., Blacksburg. 75 p.Google Scholar
9. Lord, W. J. and Vlack, E. 1973. Responses of peach trees to herbicides, mulch, mowing, and cultivation. Weed Sci. 21:227229.Google Scholar
10. Patterson, M. G., Wehtje, G., and Goff, W. D. 1990. Effects of weed control and irrigation on the growth of young pecans. Weed Technol. 4:892894.Google Scholar
11. Putnam, A. R., Defrank, J., and Barnes, J. P. 1983. Exploitation of allelopathy for weed control in annual and perennial cropping systems. J. Chem. Ecol. 8:10011010.Google Scholar
12. Scott, A. J. and Knott, M. 1974. A cluster analysis method for grouping means in the analysis of variance. Biometrics 30:507512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13. Shilling, D. G., Liebl, R. A., and Worsham, A. D. 1985. Rye (Secale cereale L.) and wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) mulch: the suppression of certair broadleaved weeds and the isolation and identification of Phytotoxins. p 113-131 in Thompson, A. C., ed. The Chemistry of Allelopathy and Bio chemical Interactions Among Plants. American Chemical Society, Washington, D.C. Google Scholar
14. Shribbs, J. M., Skroch, W. A., and Monaco, T. J. 1986. Interference between apple (Malus domestica) seedlings and four ground cover species under greenhouse conditions. Weed Sci. 34:533537.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15. Tewari, J. D., Rai, R. M., Danu, N. S., and Rum, C. B. 1980. Performance of different herbicides on control of weeds in young, non-bearing apple orchards. Prog. Hortic. 12:2533.Google Scholar
16. Weller, S. C., Skroch, W. A., and Monaco, T. J. 1985. Common bermudagrass (Cynodon dactylon) interference in newly planted peach (Prunus persica) trees. Weed Sci. 33:5056.Google Scholar
17. White, G. C. and Holloway, R. I. 1967. The influence of simazine or straw mulch on the establishment of apple trees in grassed down or cultivated soils. J. Hortic. Sci. 42:377389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar