Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-14T10:31:57.581Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Pragmatic and positivistic analyses of kinship terminology

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 December 2010

Murray J. Leaf
Murray J. Leaf
Affiliation:
School of Economic Political, and Policy Sciences, University of Texas, Dallas, Richardson, TX 75083-0688. mjleaf@utdallas.eduwww.utdallas.edu/~mjleaf/
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Jones' article suggests that the anthropological analysis of kinship has followed a single line of development based on a single underlying conception of meaning and method. In fact, there have been two opposed lines of development. Jones' conception is positivistic. The other is pragmatic. Pragmatic theory is superior on every recognized criterion. This briefly describes the differences.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 33 , Issue 5 , October 2010 , pp. 390 - 391
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Leaf, M. (1971) The Punjabi kinship terminology as a semantic system. American Anthropologist 73:545–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leaf, M. J. (2006) Experimental-formal analysis of kinship. Ethnology 45(4):305–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leaf, M. (2007) Empirical formalism. Structure and Dynamics: eJournal of Anthropological and Related Sciences: 2(1). http://repositories.cdlib.org/imbs/socdyn/sdeas/vol2/iss1/art2.Google Scholar
Leaf, M. (2009) Human organizations and social theory: Pragmatism, pluralism, and adaptation. University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Morgan, L. H. (1877) Ancient society or researches into the lines of human progress from savagery through barbarism to civilization. Charles H. Kerr and Co.Google Scholar
Read, D. (1984) An algebraic account of the American kinship terminology. Current Anthropology 25:417–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Read, D. (2001b) What is kinship? In: The cultural analysis of kinship: The legacy of David Schneider and its implications for anthropological relativism, ed. Feinberg, R. & Ottenheimer, M., pp. 78–117. University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Read, D. (2006) Kinship Algebra Expert System (KAES): A software implementation of a cultural theory. Social Science Computer Review 24(1):43–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Read, D. (2007) Kinship theory: A paradigm shift. Ethnology 46:329–64.Google Scholar
Read, D. & Behrens, C. (1990) KAES: An expert system for the algebraic analysis of kinship terminologies. Journal of Quantitative Anthropology 2:353–93.Google Scholar