Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T14:54:16.075Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Impact of nudging strategies on consumer food choice intentions and behaviours in leisure centres

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 November 2016

P.A. Ashworth
Affiliation:
Food and Nutrition Subject Group, Sheffield Business School, Sheffield Hallam University, Sheffield, S1 1WB, UK
C. Morris
Affiliation:
Food and Nutrition Subject Group, Sheffield Business School, Sheffield Hallam University, Sheffield, S1 1WB, UK
S. Giove
Affiliation:
Food and Nutrition Subject Group, Sheffield Business School, Sheffield Hallam University, Sheffield, S1 1WB, UK
J.R. Paxman
Affiliation:
Food and Nutrition Subject Group, Sheffield Business School, Sheffield Hallam University, Sheffield, S1 1WB, UK
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Type
Abstract
Copyright
Copyright © The Authors 2016 

The inherent leptogenic (lean promoting) physical activity environment in leisure centres, offers a platform for the communication of leptogenic food behaviours(Reference Carter, Signal and Edwards1). Nudging theory posits that the architecture of an environment, such as the design or availability of information, can influence consumer choice(Reference Olstad, Goonewardene and McCargar2). Nutritional information can also enable informed decisions(Reference Hodgkins, Raats and Fife-Schaw3). The Theory of Planned Behaviour (TPB) hypothesises that attitudes, social norms, and perceived behavioural control (PBC) inform consumer intention, and collectively predict behaviour(Reference Ajzen4). The aim of this study was to determine the impact of a nudging strategy, in the form of the provision of calorie information, on personal intention and food choice behaviour in leisure centre cafés.

The experiment comprised of a week-long pre-intervention stage (week 1) and a week-long intervention stage (week 2). During week 2, Calorie information was introduced onto the menu in an experimental centre (n 1), but not in the control centre (n 1). A questionnaire informed by the TPB(Reference Ajzen4), adapted to include concern, motives, confidence, and actual food choice, was distributed throughout the study to café users (n 323) in both centres. The mean scores for each construct, and the calorie content of food choices between the two weeks, in each of the centres, were compared using independent samples t-tests.

Fig. 1. Experimental Centre.

Fig. 2. Control Centre.

Fig 1 shows that the nudging strategy significantly increased confidence (p = ·022) and PBC (p = ·001) with regards to leptogenic food choices. This was not observed in the control centre (Fig 2). A downward trend in the average Calories consumed was observed for snack items (p = ·144), and lunches (p = ·140) consumed in the experimental centre (Fig 1). Average Calories consumed were 177 Calories lower for lunch, and 110 Calories lower for snacks during week 2, compared to week 1. A less pronounced downward trend was observed for snacks (p = ·505), but not for lunches (p = ·992), in the control centre (Fig 2).

Calorie information has the potential to change consumer interaction with the food environment in leisure centres, and increase leptogenic food behaviours. Further stages to this research will include an assessment of the goodness of fit of the adapted TPB model.

References

1.Carter, M, Signal, L, Edwards, R et al. (2013) BMC Public Health 13, 17.Google Scholar
2.Olstad, DL, Goonewardene, LA, McCargar, LJ et al. (2014) Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 11, 114.10.1186/1479-5868-11-6Google Scholar
3.Hodgkins, CE, Raats, MM, Fife-Schaw, C et al. (2015) Br J Nutr 113, 16521663.Google Scholar
4.Ajzen, I (1991) Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 50, 179211.Google Scholar
Figure 0

Fig. 1. Experimental Centre.

Figure 1

Fig. 2. Control Centre.