Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T20:33:02.286Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The impact of cooking and digestion on the phenolic acid content of selected Nigerian and UK grown wholegrains

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 April 2021

O. A. Obayiuwana
Affiliation:
Department of Life Sciences, University of Roehampton, United Kingdom Department of Medical Biochemistry, University of Benin, Nigeria
V. Behrends
Affiliation:
Department of Life Sciences, University of Roehampton, United Kingdom
Y. Calle-Patino
Affiliation:
Department of Life Sciences, University of Roehampton, United Kingdom
A. Costabile
Affiliation:
Department of Life Sciences, University of Roehampton, United Kingdom
G. Corona
Affiliation:
Department of Life Sciences, University of Roehampton, United Kingdom
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Type
Abstract
Copyright
Copyright © The Authors 2021

Wholegrains are a good source of phenolic acids (PAs), which can significantly contribute to their beneficial health properties. Thus, their bioactivity will depend on their bioaccessibility and bioavailability, which in turn can be significantly affected by cooking and digestion processes.

This study aims to determine the PAs profile of Nigerian and UK grown cereal grains (red and white fonio, red and white millet, red and white sorghum, red and white quinoa, emmer, spelt rye, ofada rice, white corn and hulless barley). A selection of four PAs rich grains was further studied to assess the impact of cooking and in vitro digestion on the PAs levels.

Grains were finely milled, and the extraction of soluble and bound phenolic acid was conducted as described by Li et al. (2008)(Reference Li, Shewry and Ward1) and 25 PAs were quantified using UHPLC/ MS-MS(Reference Schär, Corona and Soycan2). Grains were cooked by boiling and subsequently oral, gastric and small intestinal phases of digestion were simulated in vitro under pH and temperature-controlled environments(Reference Corona, Ji and Anegboonlap3). Statistical analysis was conducted by 2-way ANOVA, followed by Tukey's multiple comparisons test (P < 0.05) using GraphPad Prism version 8 Software.

PAs in grains were predominantly in bound form (73.15%-99.95%) and total PAs levels ranged from 132.2 ± 12.1ng/mg to 2202.5 ± 34.9 ng/mg. White corn had the highest PAs content with 99.9% of this in the bound form, while white fonio had the lowest total PAs content. Red millet, white millet and red sorghum had comparable levels of total PAs: 1631.2 ± 227.5ng/mg, 1466.1 ± 187.1ng/mg and 1464.2 ± 184.2ng/mg, respectively and they also had the relative highest amount of soluble PAs. The total amounts of hydroxycinnamic acids exceeded that of hydroxybenzoic acids with ferulic acid been the most abundant in all the grains studied. Homovanillic acid was the most abundant hydroxybenzoic acid in most grains except in quinoa and red fonio. Cooking was seen to significantly increase bound PAs content compared to raw (373.1 ± 8.0ng/mg to 3342.6 ± 920.1ng/mg; P < 0.05) in all grains except in red fonio, whereas it led to a significant decrease in soluble PAs for all grains (1.8 ± 0.8ng/mg to 18.5 ± 7.1ng/mg; P < 0.05). In vitro digestion led to a significant increase of bound PAs in red millet compared to raw (1414.0 ± 229.9ng/mg to 2527.8 ± 247.6ng/mg; P < 0.05), whereas it led to a significant decrease in soluble PAs in all grains (0.1 ± 0.03 to 2.4 ± 3.2; P < 0.05)

Overall, our results highlight that cooking and simulated gastrointestinal digestion can significantly affect the levels of PAs in the wholegrains studied, having an opposite impact in the levels of bound and soluble forms. The increased amount of extractable bound phenolic acids due to cooking and in vitro gastrointestinal digestion may have a potential impact of gut health. Studies are ongoing to determine the role of the gut microbiota on the bound PAs and vice-versa.

Acknowledgments

The first author is grateful to the Schlumberger Foundation for the Faculty for The Future fellowship and to the University of Roehampton for funding this study.

References

Li, L, Shewry, PR, & Ward, JL (2008) J Agric Food Chem, 56(21), 97329739.Google Scholar
Schär, MY, Corona, G, Soycan, G, et al. (2018) Mol Nutr Food Res 62, 1700499 (1–9).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corona, G, Ji, Y, Anegboonlap, P, et al. (2016) Br J Nutr 115(7), 1240–53.Google Scholar