In a randomized double-blind study, 60 children, aged 4–7 years, undergoing dental extractions of six or more teeth under day-case general anaesthesia, were assigned to receive either tramadol drops 1.5 mg kg−1 (n=31), or placebo (normal saline) (n=29), 30 min before surgery. In addition, all received anxiolytic premedication of oral midazolam 0.5 mg kg−1 (max7.5 mg) at the same time. No differences were seen in behaviour, respiratory or cardiovascular assessments. In both groups, 93% were drowsy preanaesthetic, 3% were asleep but rousable and less than 4% exhibited minor distress. At induction, mild weeping occurred in 9.7% of the tramadol group and 6.9% of the placebo group (p>0.05). Active awake recovery took 48.8 min, SD 32.6 in the tramadol group and 36.4 min, SD 29.6 in the placebo group (p>0.05). Post-operative analgesia (paracetamol 120 mg) was given to 19.4% of the tramadol group compared with 82.8% of the placebo group (p>0.05), after which the Hannalah objective pain scale scores were comparable. Analysis of the Oucher six faces pain scale showed significantly better analgesia in the tramadol group at all time points, the pain score being half that of the placebo group at 60 min and one third from 60 to 120 min (p>0.05). No adverse respiratory or cardiovascular effects were seen. For children undergoing multiple extractions, 10.7, SD 3.0, effective postextraction analgesia was provided.

We evaluated the efficacy of a newly developed prototype illuminated flexible catheter to facilitate tracheal intubation through the intubating laryngeal mask and compared this light-guided technique with the conventional blind tracheal intubation through the intubating laryngeal mask. The illuminated flexible catheter consists of a completely flexible thin plastic catheter, a bulb attached to its distal end, a 15-mm concentric adapter at its proximal end connected with a battery and a power switch. The device is placed into a silicone tracheal tube in such a way that the bulb protrudes from the distal end of the tracheal tube. One hundred adult patients, ASA I–III, scheduled to undergo propofol/fentanyl/atracurium anaesthesia for elective surgery were studied. All participants underwent a randomized double comparative cross over trial with respect to the tracheal intubation technique through the intubating laryngeal mask. The light guided tracheal intubation was performed as follows; the tracheal tube preloaded with the illuminated flexible catheter was inserted through the intubating laryngeal mask and by observing the glow in the neck was advanced into the trachea. Whenever resistance was felt during insertion, appropriate adjusting man oeuvres were performed. The intubating laryngeal mask was inserted successfully in all patients. The success rate for the blind and light-guided technique was 91% and 100%, respectively (P=0.003). The mean (±SD) duration including appropriate intubating laryngeal mask placement and tracheal intubation, was significantly lower in the light-guided tracheal intubation technique, than with the blind tracheal in-tubation (31±8s vs. 43±18s; P=0.0001). We conclude that the use of an illuminated flexible catheter carries advantages either in optimizing the intubating laryngeal mask position in the laryngopharynx or in achieving a quick and safe light-guided advancement from laryngopharynx into the trachea.

Both continuous spinal anaesthesia and continuous epidural anaesthesia are supposed to provide adequate post-operative pain relief. The purpose of this randomized, prospective study was to compare the quality of analgesia, occurence of side effects and patient satisfaction between spinal and epidural administration of bupivacaine during the first post-operative 72 h. One hundred and two patients scheduled for hip arthroplasty were randomly assigned to one of two groups: Group 1 received continuous spinal anaesthesia for intra-operative and post-operative management, Group 2 received continuous epidural anaesthesia. Immediately after surgery, the continuous spinal anaesthesia-group received a 1-mL bolus (bupivacaine 0.25%), followed by a continuous infusion of 10 mL over 24 h. The continuous epidural anaesthesia-group received a 10-mL bolus (bupivacaine 0.25%), followed by 2mL h−1. The level of pain was gauged from a verbal rating score and from a visual analogue scale; the degree of motor blockade was recorded using the Bromage score. In the continuous spinal anaesthesia-group 90.2% reported complete analgesia on the verbal rating scale, but only 21.6% of the continous epidural anaesthesia-group did. The visual analogue scale scores given by the continuous spinal anaesthesia-group were significantly lower than those of the continuous epidural anaesthesia-group. The percentage of patients with a motor block was significantly higher in the continuous spinal anaesthesia-group on the day of surgery and at the first post-operative day. During the first 24 h,nausea and vomiting occured more often in the continuous epidural anaesthesia-group. The satisfaction was considered excellent in 92.2% of the continuous spinal anaesthesia-group and in 70.6% of the continuous epidural anaesthesia-group. It is concluded that continuous spinal anaesthesia and continuous epidural anaesthesia are effective and safe for post-operative pain relief after hip replacement. Compared with continuous epidural anaesthesia, continuous spinal anaesthesia provides faster onset of pain relief,ensures better analgesia and results in more satisfied patients.

Changes in heart rate, systolic, diastolic and mean blood pressure were measured after extubation in 60 ASA Grade I and II patients to assess the effects of diltiazem (0.2 mg kg−1), verapamil (0.05 mg kg−1) and metoprolol (0.02 mg kg−1) given as a bolus 2 min before tracheal extubation. All the haemodynamic variables measured increased significantly after extubation in the control and diltiazem groups when compared with the base-line recordings (P<0.05). Metoprolol effectively blocked the increases in heart rate after extubation and the increase in blood pressure in this group was less when compared with the control group (P<0.05). Verapamil alleviated the increase in both heart rate and blood pressure. However, profound hypotension and bradycardia requiring therapy, occurred in the verapamil group. For this reason, careful observation is necessary when using variverapamil and the routine use of this drug in patients with coronary artery disease requires further studies.

Concerns about life support equipment accompanying the critically ill patient have to date made magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) studies of this patient group the exception. We present here a series of tests performed on an IVAC P3000 infusion pump to investigate its suitability for the magnetic resonance imaging environment. We investigate safety, pump performance and image quality issues. The pump was housed at the end of the patient couch to prevent motion towards the scanner. Gravimetric tests found the pump to work within acceptable parameters at a static field of 10 mT. Image interference issues were addressed.

The suitability of tramadol suppositories for inclusion in our hospital formulary for the treatment of mild to moderate post-operative pain was evaluated. In an open randomized trial, rectal tramadol was compared with our standard treatment acetaminophen/codeine suppositories. We expected tramadol to be equally effective as our current standard but with fewer side effects. Forty patients were treated with either tramadol suppositories 100 mg 6 hourly (qds) or acetaminophen/codeine suppositories 1000/20 mg qds.Patients were comparable with regard to demographic data and type of surgery and anaesthesia. Post-operative pain was scored with the aid of a Visual Analogue Scale before each drug administration, at rest and during movement. Side effects, notably nausea and vomiting, were recorded by interviewing the patients and by inspecting the nursing report. There was no difference in pain scores between the two groups. The incidence of nausea and vomiting was significantly higher in the tramadol-treated (84%) than in the acetaminophen/codeine treated group (31%). The relative risk of experiencing an episode of nausea under treatment with tramadol was 2.7 (95% confidence interval: 1.3–5.3; P=0.0001) as compared with acetaminophen/codeine. We conclude that for acute treatment of mild to moderate post-operative pain frequent nausea and vomiting makes tramadol suppositories less suitable than acetaminophen/codeine.

Little is known about the performance of ultrasonic nebulizers during different ventilation patterns when these nebulizers are used to deliver drugs to intubated, ventilated patients. A method that enables the performance of an ultrasonic nebulizer to be evaluated is described. We used an in vitro model to examine the performance of the DeVilbiss Ultra-Neb 2000 ultrasonic nebulizer under positive pressure ventilation. Performance was measured at different rates of nebulization and under changing conditions of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP), inspiratory flow rate, inspiratory time and minute volume. The volume of saline nebulized was unchanged by variations in positive end expiratory pressure from 0 to 5 cm to 10 cm H2O, in minute ventilation and in inspiratory flow rate. An increase in the inspiratory time resulted in an increase in the volume of saline nebulized and this volume was greater as the power setting of the nebulizer was increased. We conclude that ultrasonic nebulizers may be affected by different patterns of ventilation and that this simple in vitro assessment of nebulizer function in an intensive care setting may be of value prior to nebulizer use.

A patient with acute intermittent porphyria was anaesthetized with propofol as part of general an-aesthesia for cholecystectomy. Post-operatively, no clinical sequelae resulted and urinary porphyrins did not exceed pre-operative values.

A case of recurarization in the recovery room is reported. Accumulation of atracurium in the intravenous line led to recurarization after flushing the line in the recovery room. A respiratory arrest with severe desaturation and bradycardia occurred. Circumstances leading to this event and the mechanisms enabling a neuromuscular blockade to occur, following the administration of a small dose of relaxant, are discussed.

A 45-year-old male, with symptoms of many years standing of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease, was subjected, under general anaesthesia, to laparoscopic fundoplication.Tracheal intubation yielded no problems but great difficulties were encountered during tube insertion into the oesophagus. After surgery, aphonia developed. Laryngological examination demonstrated paralysis of the left vocal cord. Voice strength returned to the pre-operative status after 3 months, and laryngological examination confirmed normal mobility of both cords. The possible cause of the complication was damage to the left recurrent laryngeal nerve which occurred during insertion of the tube into the oesophagus. Gastro-oesophageal reflux disease causing ‘acid laryngitis’ can create conditions favouring this type of complication.