Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T22:23:59.508Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Predictors of vitamin D-containing supplement use in Australia and associations between dose and vitamin D status

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 November 2016

L.J. Black
Affiliation:
School of Public Health, Curtin University, Perth, Australia
P. Jacoby
Affiliation:
Telethon Kids Institute, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia
C.A. Nowson
Affiliation:
Centre for Physical Activity and Nutrition Research (C-PAN), Deakin University, Melbourne, Australia
R.M. Daly
Affiliation:
Centre for Physical Activity and Nutrition Research (C-PAN), Deakin University, Melbourne, Australia
R.M. Lucas
Affiliation:
National Centre for Epidemiology and Population Health, The Australian National University, Canberra, Australia
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Type
Abstract
Copyright
Copyright © The Authors 2016 

Societal and lifestyle changes mean that many Australians now lead predominantly indoor lifestyles, and nearly one in four adults are vitamin D deficient (25-hydroxyvitamin D (25(OH)D) <50 nmol/L)(1). Since natural food sources of vitamin D are limited, with vitamin D present mostly in small amounts, supplementation is an alternative for increasing vitamin D status. However, very little is known about the prevalence and predictors of vitamin D-containing supplement use in Australia. The aims of this study were to describe the prevalence of vitamin D-containing supplement use in the Australian population, identify independent predictors of vitamin D-containing supplement use in adults, and investigate associations between supplemental vitamin D intake and serum 25(OH)D concentrations.

We used supplement intake data from a 24-hour dietary recall (n = 12,153; ages ⩾2 years) and serum 25(OH)D concentrations measured in adults (n = 7,751; ⩾18 years), collected as part of the 2011–2013 Australian Health Survey. Multiple regression models were used to investigate predictors (sex, age group, region of birth, State/Territory, season, education, socio-economic status, BMI category, physical activity, health condition, self-assessed health) of vitamin D-containing supplement use in adults, along with associations between dose and 25(OH)D concentrations/vitamin D sufficiency, adjusting for potential confounders.

The table shows the prevalence of vitamin D-containing supplement use by age group and type of supplement: overall vitamin D-containing supplement use was 10 %, 6 % and 19 % in children (2–11 y), adolescents (12–17 y) and adults (⩾18 y), respectively. Predictors of vitamin D-containing supplement use in adults included being female, advancing age, higher educational attainment, higher socio-economic status, and greater physical activity. After adjusting for potential confounders, a 1 µg increase in vitamin D intake from supplements was associated with an increase of 0·41 nmol/L in serum 25(OH)D concentrations (95 %CI 0·35, 0·47; p < 0·001), and vitamin D intake (μg) from supplements was positively associated with vitamin D sufficiency (25(OH)D ⩾50 nmol/L) (OR 1·08; 95 %CI 1·06, 1·11; p < 0·001).

1With added vitamin D; 2Inherent vitamin D with/without added vitamin D; MMVM, multivitamin/mineral

In summary, our results show that a 25 µg (1000 IU) dose of vitamin D (the daily dose in a single vitamin D supplement) equates to an average increase in 25(OH)D concentrations of 10 nmol/L in adults, and that adults who use a single vitamin D supplement are significantly more likely to be vitamin D sufficient than those who do not use a supplement. However, since only one in 20 adults reported taking a single vitamin D supplement, supplements are unlikely to make a major contribution to vitamin D status at a population level.

References

1.ABS (2014) Australian Health Survey: Biomedical results for nutrients. Canberra: ABS.Google Scholar