No CrossRef data available.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 20 January 2017
Open the website of the Financial Action Task Force (or FATF) and find your way to the “FATF Presidency” page. Up until the end of June 2015, you would have encountered a headshot of a dapper fellow with smiling eyes and a pink bowtie: Roger Wilkins OA, President of FATF between July 2014 and June 2015. A one time “mandarin” of the public service in Australia (former Secretary of the federal Attorney-General’s Department in that country), Mr. Wilkins seems an apt embodiment of those qualities that Stavros Gadinis would have us see in the FATF, as a “ministry executives” network. It seems entirely plausible to cast Wilkins as a vehicle of such networks’ “key motivation”—to pursue “broad societal goals.” From his record, he seems well suited to the role of guardian of “states’ interests” in a “secure environment,” deft at deploying his “longstanding connections” and “power relations” in order to “strike deals” and, where necessary, unleash “sanctions’ firepower.” In short, Mr. Wilkins seems to “fit neatly within the three types—private, regulator, ministry” around which Stavros Gadinis’ thought-provoking article revolves.
1 Financial Action Task Force.
2 Financial Action Task Force, FATF Presidency.
3 Financial Action Task Force, Roger Wilkins OA (2014-2015).
4 Thomson, Philip, Retired public servant Roger Wilkins urges colleagues to loosen up, Sydney Morning Herald, Sep. 1, 2014 Google Scholar.
5 Gadinis, Stavros, Three Pathways to Global Standards: Private, Regulator, and Ministry Networks, 109 AJIL 1 at 4 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
6 Id. at 12, 29.
7 Id. at 13, 14, 16-17.
8 Id. at 50.
9 Citigroup.
10 Gadinis, supra note 5, at 11, 14.
11 Strathern, Marilyn, Cutting the Network, 2 J. Royal Anthropological Inst. 517, at 522-523 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
12 Gadinis, supra note 5, at 11.
13 Id. at 2, 8-9.
14 Id. at 54.
15 Id. at 21.
16 Id. at 2, 53.
17 Bruno Latour.
18 Latour, Bruno, We Have Never Been Modern 11 (1993)Google Scholar; Gadinis, supra note 5, at 10, 12, 13.
19 Gadinis, supra note 5, at 7, 8.
20 Id. at 15.
21 Weintraub, Jeff & Kumar, Krishan, Public and Private in Thought and Practice: Perspectives on a Grand Dichotomy (1997)Google Scholar; Marx, Karl, On the Jewish Question, in The Marx-Engels Reader 26 (Tucker, Robert C. ed., 1978)Google Scholar (1843) Rhode, Deborah L., Feminist Critical Theories, 42 Stan. L. Rev. 617 (1989)Google Scholar.
22 Gadinis, supra note 5, at 54.
23 See, e.g., Ho, Karen, Liquidated: An Ethnography of Wall Street 73–122 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar. For historical illustrations of this phenom enon, see Stern, Philip J., The Company-State: Corporate Sovereignty and the Early Modern Foundations of the British Empire in India (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
24 Wolfsberg Group.
25 Pieth, Mark and Aiolfi, Gemma, The Private Sector Becomes active: The Wolfsberg Process, 10 J. Fin. Crime 359 (2003)Google Scholar.
26 On networks and hybrids, see Strathern, supra note 11, at 521-522, and Latour, supra note 18, at 10-11.
27 Gadinis, supra note 5, at 11.
28 Id. at 12.
29 Id. at 11-12.
30 Id. at 13.
31 Id. at 15.
32 William Shakespeare, King Lear.
33 Gadinis, supra note 5, at 46.
34 Id. at 12.
35 Id. at 13.
36 Id. at 15.
37 Id. at 46.
38 Id. at 57.
39 Id. at 52.
40 Network, n. and adj., Definition, Oxford English Dictionary.
41 Gadinis, supra note 5, at 1.
Target article
Three Pathways to Global Standards: Private, Regulator, and Ministry Networks
Related commentaries (4)
Enter the Fox—Lumping and Splitting in the Study of Transnational Networks: A Response to Stavros Gadinis
Introduction to Symposium on Stavros Gadinis, “Three Pathways to Global Standards: Private, Regulator, and Ministry Networks”
Standards, Networks, and the Political Economy of International Lawmaking: A Response to Stavros Gadinis
Starting and Stopping Points: A Response to Stavros Gadinis