Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T22:00:16.623Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Analysis of the nutritional priorities, practices and preferences of athletes and active individuals to inform new food product development in sports nutrition

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 August 2021

C.C. Carey
Affiliation:
Cork Centre for Vitamin D and Nutrition Research, School of Food and Nutritional Sciences, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland
L. Doyle
Affiliation:
Department of Sport and Exercise Science, Waterford Institute of Technology, Waterford, Ireland
A. Lucey
Affiliation:
Cork Centre for Vitamin D and Nutrition Research, School of Food and Nutritional Sciences, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Type
Abstract
Copyright
Copyright © The Authors 2021

Sport and exercise nutrition is a rapidly growing sector with increasing demand for evidence-based products to support both competitive and healthy lifestyles. Transitions towards personalised(Reference Ordovas, Ferguson and Tai1) and periodised(Reference Stellingwerff, Morton and Burke2) nutrition practices for sport have led to considerable improvements in exercise performance and training adaptation. The aim of this research is to gain an understanding of the practices, perceived priorities and product preferences of athletes and active individuals, this data would provide important insight for the development of new scientifically informed food products to support performance nutrition.

A questionnaire assessing nutritional practice, perceived priorities and product preferences was devised and received university ethical approval. Questionnaire design was informed and piloted by athletes and active individuals over a series of focus-group sessions. Participants were ≥18 years and actively participated in competitive sport or structured physical activity (PA) (≥2-sessions/week). Data collection included multiple-choice, rating scale, rank order and matrix scale questions, which was distributed using Qualtrics (March-May 2020). Data was analysed using IBM SPSS and is presented as descriptive statistics.

A total of 405 (164f, 241m) participants aged 29±9 (mean±SD) years were included in the final analysis. Of these, 73% of participants reported active participation in competitive sport while 27% participants undertook non-competitive structured PA exclusively. Participants performed 10.3±6.6 hours per week of PA. When asked to rank their top three most desired effects of a sports nutrition product; enhanced muscular recovery was most frequently prioritised receiving 101 first choice preferences and 295 top 3 preferences. Of all participants, 58% reported regular use of nutritional supplements, with 51% of all participants noting use for health and wellbeing purposes and 35% reporting use for exercise performance or recovery. When presented with a list of functional foods; Caffeine-containing functional foods were the most commonly consumed, with 33% reporting use in relation to exercise performance. When asked to rank the importance of various features of a sports nutrition food product, nutritional profile ranked as most important (3.4±0.7 out of 4); followed by taste (3.2±0.8) and accessibility (3.1±0.7). Wholefood type products received the most first preference selections and most top 3 selections when presented with a number of popular performance and recovery products on the market.

The global movement towards food first approaches for sport nutrition(3,4) provides a unique opportunity for the development of evidence-based functional foods. This lead and end-user validated survey indicates that the availability of evidence-based foods is well received and expected by the sports nutrition sector. Nutritional profile, taste, and accessibility rank as key consumer priorities to inform new product development with whole food product types the most desirable. Foods to support muscle recovery are of particular value to users and the fundamental science to underpin merits further research.

References

Ordovas, JM, Ferguson, LR, Tai, ES, et al. (2018) Brit Med JGoogle Scholar
Stellingwerff, T, Morton, JP & Burke, LM (2019) Int J Sport Nutr Exerc MetabGoogle Scholar
Sport Ireland Anti Doping Supplements Policy (2017)Google Scholar
WADA (2021) World Anti-Doping CodeGoogle Scholar