Article contents
Introduction to Symposium on Joost Pauwelyn, “The Rule of Law Without the Rule of Lawyers? Why Investment Arbitrators are from Mars, Trade Adjudicators are from Venus”
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 20 January 2017
Abstract
- Type
- Symposium on Joost Pauwelyn, “The Rule of Law Without the Rule of Lawyers? Why Investment Arbitrators are from Mars, Trade Adjudicators are from Venus”
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © American Society of International Law 2015
References
1 Pauwelyn, Joost, The Rule of Law Without the Rule of Lawyers? Why Investment Arbitrators Are from Mars, Trade Adjudicators from Venus, 109 AJIL 761 (2015)Google Scholar.
2 Paulsson, Jan, Arbitration Without Privity, 10 ICSID Foreign Inv. L.J. 232 (1995)Google Scholar.
3 Graham Cook, A Digest of WTO Jurisprudence on Public International Law Concepts and Principles (2015) cites over two hundred panel or Appellate Body reports or WTO arbitrator’s awards where public international law rules or principles have been discussed.
4 Pauwelyn, supra note 1, at 768.
5 Id. at 803.
6 Jürgen Kurtz, The WTO and International Investment Law: Converging Systems (2016).
7 Pauwelyn, supra note 1, at 803.
8 Sacerdoti, Giorgio, Panelists, Arbitrators, Judges: A Response to Joost Pauwelyn, 109 AJIL Unbound 283. (2016)Google Scholar.
9 Marceau, Gabrielle, Quinn, Catherine, and Hoyos, Juan Pablo Moya, Judging from Venus: A Response to Joost Pauwelyn, 109 AJIL Unbound 288 (2016)Google Scholar.
10 Rogers, Catherine A., Apparent Dichotomies, Covert Similarities: A Response to Joost Pauwelyn, 109 AJIL Unbound 294 (2016)Google Scholar.
11 Baetens, Freya, The Rule of Law or the Perception of the Beholder? Why Investment Arbitrators are under Fire and Trade Adjudicators are not: A Response to Joost Pauwelyn, 109 AJIL Unbound 302 (2016)Google Scholar.
12 Howse, Robert, Venus, Mars, and Brussels: Legitimacy and Dispute Settlement Culture in Investment Law and WTO Law: A Response to Joost Pauwelyn, 109 AJIL Unbound 309 (2016)Google Scholar.
Target article
The Rule of Law Without the Rule of Lawyers? Why Investment Arbitrators Are from Mars, Trade Adjudicators from Venus
Related commentaries (7)
Apparent Dichotomies, Covert Similarities: A Response to Joost Pauwelyn
Introduction to Symposium on Joost Pauwelyn, “The Rule of Law Without the Rule of Lawyers? Why Investment Arbitrators are from Mars, Trade Adjudicators are from Venus”
Judging from Venus: A Response to Joost Pauwelyn
Panelists, Arbitrators, Judges: A Response to Joost Pauwelyn
The Relative Success of WTO Dispute Settlement and What Planet Would the EU Investment Court System Be On? A Rejoinder to AJIL Unbound Comments
The Rule of Law or the Perception of the Beholder? Why Investment Arbitrators are Under Fire and Trade Adjudicators are Not: A Response to Joost Pauwelyn
Venus, Mars, and Brussels: Legitimacy and Dispute Settlement Culture in Investment Law and WTO Law: A Response to Joost Pauwelyn