Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T06:36:51.306Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The evolution of the shaman's cultural toolkit

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2018

Aiyana K. Willard ,
Yo Nakawake  and
Jonathan Jong
Aiyana K. Willard
Affiliation:
Institute of Cognitive and Evolutionary Anthropology, Oxford University, Oxford OX2 6PE, United Kingdomaiyana.willard@anthro.ox.ac.ukyo.nakawake@anthro.ox.ac.ukwww.aiyanawillard.comwww.sites.google.com/site/ynakawake/home
Yo Nakawake
Affiliation:
Institute of Cognitive and Evolutionary Anthropology, Oxford University, Oxford OX2 6PE, United Kingdomaiyana.willard@anthro.ox.ac.ukyo.nakawake@anthro.ox.ac.ukwww.aiyanawillard.comwww.sites.google.com/site/ynakawake/home
Jonathan Jong
Affiliation:
Institute of Cognitive and Evolutionary Anthropology, Oxford University, Oxford OX2 6PE, United Kingdomaiyana.willard@anthro.ox.ac.ukyo.nakawake@anthro.ox.ac.ukwww.aiyanawillard.comwww.sites.google.com/site/ynakawake/home Centre for Psychology, Behavior & Achievement, Coventry University CV1 5FB, United Kingdom. jonathan.jong@coventry.ac.ukwww.jonathanjong.ninja
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A complete picture of shamanism's cultural evolution requires an understanding of how the professionalization of shamanism affects the distribution of knowledge within societies. We suggest that limiting knowledge to fewer people could impede the accumulation of functional knowledge within shamanism. On this basis, we make further predictions about how the domain of shamanism could change and collapse.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 41 , 2018 , e89
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Acerbi, A. & Tennie, C. (2016) The role of redundant information in cultural transmission and cultural stabilization. Journal of Comparative Psychology 130(1):62–70. doi:10.1037/a0040094.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Aoki, K., Lehmann, L. & Feldman, M. W. (2011) Rates of cultural change and patterns of cultural accumulation in stochastic models of social transmission. Theoretical Population Biology 79(4):192–202. doi:10.1016/j.tpb.2011.02.001.Google Scholar
Cavalli-Sforza, L. L. & Feldman, M. W. (1981) Cultural transmission and evolution: A quantitative approach. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Chudek, M., Heller, S., Birch, S. & Henrich, J. (2012) Prestige-biased cultural learning: Bystanders' differential attention to potential models influences children's learning. Evolution and Human Behavior 33(1):46–56. doi:10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2011.05.005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Derex, M., Beugin, M.-P., Godelle, B. & Raymond, M. (2013) Experimental evidence for the influence of group size on cultural complexity. Nature 503(7476):389–91. doi:10.1038/nature12774.Google Scholar
Eerkens, J. W. & Lipo, C. P. (2005) Cultural transmission, copying errors, and the generation of variation in material culture and the archaeological record. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 24(4):316–34. doi:10.1016/j.jaa.2005.08.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henrich, J. (2004) Demography and cultural evolution: How adaptive cultural processes can produce maladaptive losses – The Tasmania case. American Antiquity 69(22):197–214.Google Scholar
Henrich, J. & Gil-White, F. J. (2001) The evolution of prestige: Freely conferred deference as a mechanism for enhancing the benefits of cultural transmission. Evolution and Human Behavior 22:165–96. doi:10.1016/S1090-5138(00)00071-4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Henrich, J. & Henrich, N. (2010) The evolution of cultural adaptations: Fijian food taboos protect against dangerous marine toxins. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 277(1701):3715–24. doi:10.1098/rspb.2010.1191.Google Scholar
Hultkrantz, Å. (1985) The shaman and the medicine-man. Social Science and Medicine 1985; 20(5):511–15. doi:10.2307/534522?ref=search-gateway:45e5c1245e0e61c9f1fe29fffad74e19.Google Scholar
Humphrey, C. & Laidlaw, J. (1994) The archetypal actions of ritual. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kline, M. A. & Boyd, R. (2010) Population size predicts technological complexity in Oceania. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 277(1693):2559–64. doi:10.1098/rspb.2010.0452.Google Scholar
Muthukrishna, M., Shulman, B. W., Vasilescu, V. & Henrich, J. (2013) Sociality influences cultural complexity. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 281(1774):20132511. doi:10.1098/rspb.2013.2511.Google Scholar
Norris, P. & Inglehart, R. (2004) Sacred and secular: Religion and politics worldwide. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Powell, A., Shennan, S. & Thomas, M. G. (2009) Late Pleistocene demography and the appearance of modern human behavior. Science 324(5932):1298–301. doi:10.1126/science.1170165.Google Scholar
Stark, R. (1999) Secularization, RIP. Sociology of Religion 60(3):249–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stark, R. & Bainbridge, W. S. (1985) The future of religion: Secularization, revival and cult formation. University of California Press.Google Scholar
Weber, M. (1969) The sociology of religion: Introduction by Talcott Parsons, Trans. Fischoff, Ephraim. Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Whitehouse, H. (2004) Modes of religiosity: A cognitive theory of religious transmission. AltaMira Press.Google Scholar