We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
It is unclear how autografts grow and dilate after the Ross operation in children. We analysed autograft growth and dilatation in children who underwent the Ross operation and examined the relationship of these factors to autograft failure.
Methods
From our institutional database, we retrospectively identified 33 children who underwent the Ross operation without aortic root reinforcement (mean age 9.9 years) and had normal body measurements and echocardiographic data throughout follow-up.
Results
Autograft insufficiency developed in 10 patients 5.1 years after the Ross operation. The average Z score at the development of autograft insufficiency was −0.1 (range from −2.0 to 6.1). The proportions of patients who remained free of autograft insufficiency at 5 and 10 years were 87.2% and 55.7%, respectively. A consistent trend in the time course of Z score was not found in any age group studied.
Conclusions
Autograft growth and dilation after the Ross operation varied widely among patients, and the incidence of autograft insufficiency was independent of annulus size.
The prevalence of mitral valvar prolapse has been reported to be between 0.6 and 21%. The goal of our study was to evaluate its prevalence in young athletes who underwent hand-held echocardiography as a screening mostly in southern California.
Methods
We retrospectively analyzed 1742 echocardiograms that were performed as a part of a cardiac screening of teenage athletes. The total prevalence of mitral valvar prolapse was calculated and stratified based on gender.
Results
We screened a total of 1172 male and 570 female high school athletes. The echocardiographic prevalence of mitral valvar prolapse was 0.9%. The prevalence was similar in both genders, at 1.2% in male and 0.7% in female athletes.
Conclusion
The prevalence of mitral valvar prolapse in young athletes mostly in southern California was found to be less than 1%, and was similar in both genders.
Recommend this
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this to your organisation's collection.