This chapter presents a more fine-grained analysis of why and how DOM vulnerability may have become more prevalent in Spanish than in Hindi and Romanian at the individual level. Specifically, linking language acquisition, language attrition and diachronic language change, it addresses the question of the potential relationship between the I-language of the heritage speakers and the E-language of the first-generation immigrants, who are often the heritage speakers’ main source of input. It presents follow-up studies of DOM in Spanish-speaking bilingual children and adults and their mothers and the results are not consistent with direct transmission of DOM omission from the first to the second-generation (the heritage speakers). It is suggested that that second-generation heritage speakers, who have as much difficulty mastering the morphology of their heritage language as typical L2 learners, can also change the grammars of the parental generation and be the innovators in the Spanish variety spoken in the United States.

This chapter explores the relationship between language acquisition at the individual level and language change at the macro linguistic level. Given the semantic and pragmatic complexity of DOM cross-linguistically, the question arises as to how DOM is acquired by young children growing up in a monolingual environment. To what extent the semantic and pragmatic principles that guided diachronic developments constrain language development at the individual level? Language contact and bilingualism are often cited as critical factors in linguistic change at the macro-sociolinguistic level. Considering how DOM is acquired by different types of bilinguals and in different bilingual situations is critical to understand the link between language acquisition and language change. How language acquisition at the psycholinguistic level contributes to language change at the sociolinguistic and diachronic level, and the roles that both language internal (individual, cognitive factors) and language external (situational) factors play in the process and outcome of change are considered. Existing studies of DOM in L1 acquisition are discussed, followed by a critical review of studies in L2 and bilingual acquisition and in language change at the sociohistorical level. Monolingual children faithfully replicate the language they hear in the input while bilinguals are affected by dominant language transfer.

What is there in the world that we refer to as ‘the English language’? Is it more than one thing? If so, how many? And what is their ontological status? For those of us engaged in researching and teaching what we call English, these are fundamental questions, yet they are seldom posed. In addressing them explicitly here, I aim to provide academics, teachers, and policy makers with some conceptual tools and arguments for a deeper reflection on the nature of English, with a view to ultimately benefiting learners and users.

Jary and Kissine examine the meaning of imperative sentences, taking the existing relevance-theoretic semantic analysis, in terms of the desirability and potentiality of the described state of affairs, as their point of departure. In their view, a complete account of the interpretation of imperatives has to explain how they can result in the addressee forming an intention to perform an action, and this requires the theory to make room for ‘action representations’ (in addition to factual representations, such as assumptions). They claim that the imperative form is uniquely specified to interface with such action representations.

Robyn Carston discusses the relevance-based on-line construction of ad hoc concepts (or occasion-specific senses), which she takes to be the source of much semantic polysemy (where words are stored with a cluster of related senses). In an attempt to give a full account of polysemy, one that marries the pragmatics of word meaning with the demands of grammar, Carston advocates a split view of the lexicon, with one part narrowly linguistic and computational, and the other an ever-evolving store of communicational units.