Respondent-driven sampling (RDS) is frequently used when sampling from hidden populations. In RDS, sampled individuals pass on participation coupons to at most c of their acquaintances in the community (c = 3 being a common choice). If these individuals choose to participate, they in turn pass coupons on to their acquaintances, and so on. The process of recruiting is shown to behave like a new Reed–Frost-type network epidemic, in which 'becoming infected' corresponds to study participation. We calculate R0, the probability of a major 'outbreak', and the relative size of a major outbreak for c < ∞ in the limit of infinite population size and compare to the standard Reed–Frost epidemic. Our results indicate that c should often be chosen larger than in current practice.

We exhibit a scaling law for the critical SIS stochastic epidemic. If at time 0 the population consists of infected and susceptible individuals, then when the time and the number currently infected are both scaled by , the resulting process converges, as N → ∞, to a diffusion process related to the Feller diffusion by a change of drift. As a consequence, the rescaled size of the epidemic has a limit law that coincides with that of a first passage time for the standard Ornstein-Uhlenbeck process. These results are the analogs for the SIS epidemic of results of Martin-Löf (1998) and Aldous (1997) for the simple SIR epidemic.

Most epidemic models previously studied have assumed a homogeneously mixing population. Instead of making this assumption, a population divided into classes is considered; and it is assumed that the degree of mixing between classes is less than that within classes. The stochastic model in this form is intractable and approximations are made, yielding results in reasonable agreement with simulation trials.