We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
There are many studies of the prescribing of psychotropic medications for people with intellectual disability. This chapter provides data about that prescribing, the issues associated with the data and the trends in usage. Excessive or unnecessary prescribing of psychotropic medication that exposes individuals to unwanted side-effects and imposes unwarranted costs on services has been the focus of many medications review programmes. This section will review outcomes data from medication reduction programmes for individuals with intellectual disability and present practitioner guidelines. The NHS England programme STOMP (Stopping The Over-Medication of People with a learning disability and autistic people) and STAMP (Supporting Treatment and Appropriate Medication use in Paediatrics) has been the focus for many initiatives in England, resulting in the generation of many resources to assist both professions and non-professionals involved with intellectual disability.
The life expectancy for people with intellectual disability is increasing due to advances in medical treatment and social care. However, significant discrepancies in life expectancy between people with intellectual disability and the general population remain, and there continues to be scope to close the inequality gap. This was confirmed in the recent 2021 Learning Disability Mortality Review (LeDeR) report. The standardised mortality ratio for people with intellectual disability ranges from 2–5, which draws a comparison against the general population. Those with additional comorbidities such as epilepsy, genetic syndromes, and functional impairments have a lower age of death. The leading causes of death in older adults (at or over 65 years of age) between 2018 and 2021 were reviewed in the 2021 LeDeR report. In comparison to the general population, a higher proportion of deaths in older intellectual disability adults were due to COVID-19 (coronavirus disease), cancers, and influenza or pneumonia. Unsurprisingly, dementia (in particular Alzheimer’s disease), cerebrovascular disease, chronic lower respiratory tract infections, and diseases of the urinary system were more common causes of death in older intellectual disability compared to that reported in their younger counterparts. This chapter explores the various issues associated with medicating older people.
A high proportion of adults with intellectual disabilities are prescribed off-licence antipsychotics in the absence of a psychiatric illness. The National Health Service in England launched an initiative in 2016, ‘Stopping over-medication of people with a learning disability [intellectual disability], autism or both’ (STOMP), to address this major public health concern.
Aims
To gain understanding from UK psychiatrists working with adults with intellectual disabilities on the successes and challenges of withdrawing antipsychotics for challenging behaviours.
Method
An online questionnaire was sent to all UK psychiatrists working in the field of intellectual disability (estimated 225).
Results
Half of the 88 respondents stated that they started withdrawing antipsychotics over 5 years ago and 52.3% stated that they are less likely to initiate an antipsychotic since the launch of STOMP. However, since then, 46.6% are prescribing other classes of psychotropic medication instead of antipsychotics for challenging behaviours, most frequently the antidepressants. Complete antipsychotic discontinuation in over 50% of patients treated with antipsychotics was achieved by only 4.5% of respondents (n = 4); 11.4% reported deterioration in challenging behaviours in over 50% of patients on withdrawal and the same proportion (11.4%) reported no deterioration. Only 32% of respondents made the diagnosis of psychiatric illness in all their patients themselves. Family and paid carers’ concern, lack of multi-agency and multidisciplinary input and unavailability of non-medical psychosocial intervention are key reported factors hampering the withdrawal attempt.
Conclusions
There is an urgent need to develop national guidelines to provide a framework for systematic psychotropic drug reviews and withdrawal where possible.
Recommend this
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this to your organisation's collection.