To ascertain whether local anaesthetic use is of clinical benefit in nasal surgery, a prospective double-blind randomized controlled trial of topical bupivacaine on post-operative pain in patients packed after bilateral nasal surgery was carried out. Each patient received a bupivacaine-soaked and a saline-soaked Merocel pack, thereby acting as their own control. Power analysis ascertained the number of patients required to enter the trial to detect a statistically significant difference in pain. Fifty-seven patients completed the trial. Visual analogue scales determined the level of post-operative pain at different time points in each nostril. Less pain was demonstrated in nostrils containing bupivacaine-soaked packs compared with saline-soaked packs at two hours (p < 0.0001), four hours (p = 0.0183) and six hours (p = 0.0476) post-operatively. Although not statistically significant, less pain was noted on pack removal on the local anaesthetic sides. These results provide clinical-based evidence for the use of bupivacaine as a local anaesthetic in reducing pain following nasal surgery with packing.

Summary

Background and objective: Transurethral prostatectomy is routinely performed under spinal anaesthesia. This technique can cause hypotension, which is particularly undesirable in the elderly. The objective was to compare spinal anaesthesia for transurethral prostatectomy using hyperbaric bupivacaine 15 mg (control group) and hyperbaric bupivacaine 10 mg (limiting spread by maintaining the upright position for 15 min) and fentanyl 25 μg (fentanyl group) in terms of haemodynamic and pulmonary function.

Methods: Thirty ASA I–III patients were randomly selected and underwent spinal anaesthesia with either hyperbaric bupivacaine 15 mg (immediately positioned supine) or hyperbaric bupivacaine 10 mg (upright for 15 min) and fentanyl 25 μg.

Results: The greatest changes in mean arterial pressure (P = 0.9), ephedrine requirements (P = 0.8) and mean maximum change in forced vital capacity (P = 0.5) were similar in both groups.

Conclusions: The addition of fentanyl 25 μg to bupivacaine 10 mg and limiting the spread of the block does not improve either haemodynamic or pulmonary function compared with bupivacaine 15 mg in patients undergoing transurethral prostatectomy.

Summary

Background and objective: The reported incidence of shoulder tip pain following laparoscopic surgery varies from 35 to 63%. This study evaluated the analgesic efficacy of either performing a prophylactic suprascapular nerve block with bupivacaine or applying a piroxicam patch to the skin over both shoulders for the relief of shoulder tip pain after laparoscopy.

Methods: Sixty healthy informed female patients were randomly assigned to one of three groups: (a) a control group (n = 20), no treatment; (b) a suprascapular nerve block group (n = 20) in which a bilateral suprascapular nerve block was performed before induction of anaesthesia with 5 mL 0.5% bupivacaine with epinephrine; and (c) a piroxicam patch group (n = 20) in which a 48 mg piroxicam patch on the skin of each shoulder was applied before induction of anaesthesia. All patients received a total intravenous anaesthesia technique with propofol, fentanyl and vecuronium. Shoulder tip and wound pain were recorded on a visual analogue pain scale at five time intervals for 24 h after surgery.

Results: A total of 80% of patients in the control group, 75% in the suprascapular nerve block group and 45% in the piroxicam patch group complained of shoulder tip pain during the recording period (P < 0.05). The scores for shoulder tip pain in the piroxicam patch group were significantly lower compared with the control group at 3, 6 and 12 h, and compared with the suprascapular nerve block group at 6 and 12 h. The need for analgesics was also significantly lower in the piroxicam patch group compared with the other two groups.

Conclusions: Prophylactic piroxicam patches are effective and safe for the relief of shoulder tip pain after laparoscopy. Bilateral suprascapular nerve block is not effective in this setting.

Background and objective: A critical factor that delays patient discharge following day-surgery is severe postoperative pain and the requirement for strong analgesics. Laparoscopic sterilization is a day case procedure and is associated with additional postoperative pain compared with diagnostic laparoscopy. This pain, associated with application of Filshie clips, may be ischaemic or spasmodic in aetiology. Papaverine relaxes smooth muscle, and the aim of the study was to investigate if papaverine would be effective in improving postoperative pain if administered directly to the Fallopian tubes. Bupivacaine is used commonly in day-surgery and so we compared the effect of this local anaesthetic with saline placebo.

Methods: Sixty-six ASA I-II females undergoing laparoscopic sterilization were entered into the prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial. They received intrauterine papaverine (30 mg) or bupivacaine (0.375% 30 mL) or normal saline (30 mL) via the transcervical route before application of Filshie clips.

Results: There were no significant differences in the postoperative period between the three groups in the number of patients needing analgesia in the first 60 min postoperatively, the time to first analgesia, the rescue analgesic or antiemetic consumption, the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting, and the sedation and visual analogue pain scores.

Conclusions: From the data presented, we would not recommend routine transcervical administration of papaverine or bupivacaine for pain following laparoscopic sterilization.

Background and objective: Epidural analgesia with bupivacaine plus either sufentanil or fentanyl is widely used during labour, but it is not clear which opioid is to be preferred. The study compared these opioids at equianalgesic doses in terms of analgesia, onset time and side-effects.

Methods: Ninety females in active labour were entered into the randomized, double-blind trial. A test dose of bupivacaine was given into the epidural space. Parturients in Group S received sufentanil 8 mL as a bolus dose, followed by an infusion at a rate of 5 mL h−1 of a mixture containing sufentanil 1 µg mL−1 and bupivacaine 1 mg mL−1. Patients in Group F received fentanyl 8 mL as a bolus, followed by an infusion at 5 mL h−1 of a solution containing fentanyl 3.5 µg mL−1 and bupivacaine 1 mg mL−1. Additional boluses of 5 mL were of the relevant solution were given if necessary.

Results: In a ratio of 1.0 : 3.5 (sufentanil 1 µg versus fentanyl 3.5 µg), both groups reported the same analgesia with the same onset time. The onset time to obtain 50% of the initial visual analogue score was 10 and 11 min for Groups S and F, respectively. Mean visual analogue scores in Groups S and F respectively declined from 77 and 82 before epidural blockade, to 29 and 27 during the first stage of labour, and to 69 and 59 respectively during the second stage. Overall satisfaction among parturients was high (98 and 96%), particularly during the first stage (98 and 98%), and also to a large degree during the second stage of labour (74 and 79%). Furthermore, only a few extra bolus doses were required (mean 0.9 and 1.2, Groups S and F, respectively). All the females could stand on their own, and almost all (81% Group S; 79% Group F) could walk 20 m without help. There were no serious adverse effects. Moderate side-effects occurred equally often with the possible exception of less nausea and vomiting in the fentanyl group.

Conclusions: Epidural analgesia for ambulatory parturients with bupivacaine plus either sufentanil or fentanyl (ratio 1.0 : 3.5) provides good analgesia with a low frequency of modest side-effects. No clinical differences were found between the opioids.

Background and objective: The effect of anaesthesia and surgery on gastric emptying is not constant, and this has not been previously studied in patients undergoing thoracotomy for lung resection with a bupivacaine-fentanyl epidural infusion for analgesia. There are important implications in this group of patients with regards to the recommencement of important oral medication as well as the risks of aspiration of gastric contents. The study examined gastric emptying in these patients until the second postoperative day.

Methods: In a prospective repeated measures study, the effect of fentanyl-bupivacaine epidural analgesia at the mid-thoracic level on gastric emptying was assessed in 11 patients undergoing thoracotomy for lung resection. Gastric emptying was measured using a paracetamol absorption technique. Patients acted as their preoperative controls and were assessed 4 h postoperatively and on the second postoperative day.

Results: The mean (SEM) maximum plasma paracetamol concentration was 204.6 (20.4) μmol L−1 before operation, 61 (9.5) μmol L−1 4 h postoperatively and 114.3 (22.6) μmol L−l on the second postoperative day. Mean (SEM) paracetamol absorption at 120 min was 15 638 (1441) μmol min L−l preoperatively, 5731 (821) μmol min L−l4 h postoperatively and 9325 (1759) μmol min L−l on the second postoperative day. Postoperative values were significantly (P < 0.005) less than the preoperative values.

Conclusions: After thoracotomy, gastric emptying was delayed until at least the second postoperative day in patients receiving mid-thoracic fentanyl-bupivacaine epidural analgesia.

Background and objective: Epidural analgesia is the most effective method for pain relief during labour. The aim was to elucidate the efficacy of ropivacaine 0.05% and bupivacaine 0.05%, which were both combined with fentanyl 0.00015% to provide analgesia in labour.

Methods: Forty nulliparous females were enrolled into the study. After insertion of an epidural catheter, patients were randomly assigned into two groups. Once the os uteri had dilated to 4–5 cm, a bolus of bupivacaine 0.125% 10 mL + fentanyl 50 μg (1 mL) in Group 1 patients, and ropivacaine 0.125% 10 mL + fentanyl 50 μg (1 mL) in Group 2 patients was administered via the epidural catheter. Then, patient-controlled epidural analgesia was started with a basal infusion of bupivacaine 0.05% 10 mL h−1 + fentanyl 0.00015% 1.5 μg mL−1 in Group 1, and ropivacaine 0.05% + fentanyl 1.5 μg mL−1 in Group 2. When needed, a 10 mL bolus infusion could be given and the lockout time was 20 min. Maternal and fetal haemodynamic variables were monitored before induction and subsequently at 5 min intervals. Using a visual analogue scale assessed the degree of pain.

Results: Maternal haemodynamic variables and Apgar scores were not different between the two groups. The second stage of the labour was shorter in Group 2 (P < 0.01). There were no significant differences in patients’ assessment of motor block or mode of delivery between groups.

Conclusions: An epidural infusion (10 mL h−1) of bupivacaine 0.05% or ropivacaine 0.05% together with fentanyl 1.5 μg mL−1 provided good and safe analgesia during labour.

Background and objective: Recent clinical studies comparing ropivacaine 0.25% with bupivacaine 0.25% reported not only comparable analgesia, but also comparable motor block for epidural analgesia during labour. An opioid can be combined with local anaesthetic to reduce the incidence of side-effects and to improve analgesia for the relief of labour pain. The purpose of the study was to evaluate the effects of epidural bupivacaine 0.2% compared with ropivacaine 0.2% combined with fentanyl for the initiation and maintenance of analgesia during labour and delivery.

Methods: Sixty labouring nulliparous women were randomly allocated to receive either bupivacaine 0.2% with fentanyl 2 μg mL−1 (B/F), or ropivacaine 0.2% with fentanyl 2 μg mL−1 (R/F). For the initiation of epidural analgesia, 8 mL of the study solution was administered. Supplemental analgesia was obtained with 4 mL of the study solution according to parturients’ needs when their pain was ≥4 on a visual analogue scale. Analgesia, hourly local anaesthetic use, motor block, patient satisfaction and side-effects between groups were evaluated during labour and at delivery.

Results: Sixty patients were enrolled and 53 completed the study. No differences in verbal pain scores, hourly local anaesthetic use or patient satisfaction between groups were observed. However, motor block was observed in 10 patients in the B/F group whereas only two patients had motor block in the R/F group (P < 0.05). The incidence of instrumental delivery was also higher in the B/F group than in the R/F group (P < 0.05).

Conclusions: The results suggest that epidural bupivacaine 0.2% and ropivacaine 0.2% combined with fentanyl produced equivalent analgesia for pain relief during labour and delivery. It is concluded that ropivacaine 0.2% combined with fentanyl 2 μg mL−1 provided effective analgesia with significantly less motor block and need for an instrumental delivery than a bupivacaine/fentanyl combination at the same concentrations during labour and delivery.

Post-operative pain and delayed oral intake are common reasons for failure of discharge in day-case tonsillectomy. A double blind prospective randomized study was devised to investigate the effectiveness of topical bupivacaine in reducing post-operative pain in paediatric day-case tonsillectomy. Ninety-nine patients aged between three and 16 years were recruited into the study. One group received bupivacaine soaked swabs tightly packed in their tonsillar fossae while the control group received saline-soaked swabs. The bupivacaine group was found to drink (p < 0.001) and eat (p = 0.006) earlier than the control group. The pain scores at one (p < 0.001), three (p < 0.001) and six (p < 0.001) hours post-operatively were also found to be lower in the bupivacaine group than the control group. We conclude that topical bupivacaine has a role in facilitating recovery in day-case tonsillectomy in children.

Background and objective It is claimed that local anaesthetics have antimicrobial properties. Our aim was to investigate the antimicrobial effects of different concentrations of ropivacaine, bupivacaine, lidocaine and prilocaine on Escherichia coli, Staphylococcus aureus, Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Candida albicans.

Methods All local anaesthetic dilutions were exposed to microorganisms for 0, 30, 60, 120, 240 min at room temperature. The inoculums taken from diluted suspensions were reinoculated on blood agar and incubated for 18–24 h at 35°C and then the colonies were counted.

Results Ropivacaine did not inhibit any of the microorganisms tested. Bupivacaine reduced the viable cells of P. aeruginosa at 0.5% and 0.25% solutions. Lidocaine 5% and 2% and prilocaine 2.0% dilutions reduced the viable cells of all microorganisms tested. Prilocaine 1.0% reduced the viable cells of E. coli, S. aureus and P. aeruginosa. Lidocaine 1% reduced only the viable cells of P. aeruginosa and prilocaine 0.5% reduced only E. coli.

Conclusion Ropivacaine had no antimicrobial effect on microorganisms tested. Bupivacaine showed poor antimicrobial effectiveness. Lidocaine and prilocaine had more powerful antimicrobial effects than the other two local anaesthetics.

Background and objective The aim of the present study was to compare and assess the quality of analgesia, the safety and the side-effects after the use of a continuous, thoracic epidural infusion of sufentanil (5 μg h−1), 0.25% bupivacaine (10 mL h−1), 0.2% ropivacaine (10 mL h−1) alone or in combination in patients who had undergone major urological surgery. This prospective, randomized, double-blinded study investigated the efficacy of thoracic epidural infusions after major urological surgery.

Methods Patients received a 72-h continuous infusion␣(10 mL h−1) of 0.25% bupivacaine (B), 0.2% ropivacaine (R), 0.25% bupivacaine with 0.5 μg mL−1 sufentanil (BS), 0.2% ropivacaine with 0.5 μg mL−1 sufentanil (RS) or 0.5 μg mL−1 sufentanil only (S). The analysis included 109 patients.

Results The mean visual analogue scale (VAS) scores for pain were highest in the groups R and S (P < 0.001). The PaCO2 values were significantly higher in the groups RS and S (P = 0.003). Motor block occurred more frequently in the groups B and BS than in the other groups (P < 0.001). Sedation, nausea and pruritus were more common in the groups that received sufentanil.

Conclusions A continuous, epidural infusion with these drugs was safe and effective in our patients. The combination of 0.2% ropivacaine plus sufentanil appeared preferable because of the low incidence of motor block.

Background and objective Late postoperative hypoxaemia after upper abdominal surgery is common even among cardiopulmonary healthy patients. Atelectasis may develop after intubation and persist into or reveal a disposition for atelectasis in the postoperative period. Positive end–expiratory pressure (PEEP) eliminates peroperative atelectasis but the effect on perioperative oxygenation is controversial. This study evaluated the effect of peroperative PEEP optimized pulmonary compliance on perioperative oxygenation and complications.

Methods Forty patients assessed by electrocardiography, spirometry, functional residual capacity and diffusion capacity were randomly assigned to receive positive end–expiratory pressure (PEEP) or zero endexpiratory pressure (ZEEP) during surgery. PaO2, SPO2 and complications in the postoperative period were evaluated without knowledge of peroperative PEEP or ZEEP application.

Results Peroperative arterial oxygenation improved for all patients receiving PEEP, mean 2.1 kPa (0.7–3.5 kPa). There was no difference in postoperative median PaO2 between the groups. The differences in the incidence of late prolonged postoperative hypoxaemia and complications were 25% (−5% to 55%) and −1% (−31% to 29%) between the ZEEP and the PEEP group, but were not statistically significant.

Alpha-adrenergic agonists produce pain relief through an opioid independent mechanism and may be alternatives to opioids for combination with local anaesthetics for analgesia during labour. We studied 41 pregnant women. Epidural block was performed with 75 μg clonidine (n=20) or 50 μg fentanyl (n=21) combined with 0.125% bupivacaine (10 mL). Maternal vital parameters were measured. Analgesia was evaluated using a visual analogue scale (VAS); sedation was scored using a five-point scale. There were no differences in maternal vital parameters, fetal heart rate (FHR) or Apgar scores between the groups. Analgesia lasted longer in the bupivacaine-clonidine group (139.4±31 min) compared with the bupivacaine–fentanyl group (127.9±48 min) (P=0.42). Additional analgesic requirement was more often in the fentany–bupivacaine group and total bupivacaine requirement was less in the clonidine–bupivacaine group (22.5±12.5mg vs. 30.9±12.8 mg) (P=0.04). This small study confirms that this combination of bupivacaine and clonidine provides satisfactory analgesia for first-stage labour, and of longer duration than bupivacaine–fentanyl.

In a randomized, prospective clinical study pain relief and pulmonary function were compared after upper abdominal surgery when thoracic epidural analgesia was instituted either before or after surgery. Twenty-six patients admitted for surgery to treat gastro-oesophageal reflux received thoracic epidural analgesia as an adjunct to general anaesthesia either before or after surgery. Twelve patients received epidural mepivacaine 20 mg mL−1 and morphine perioperatively. Another 14 patients received an epidural bolus of bupivacaine 2.5 mg mL−1 and morphine after skin closure. Bupivacaine 2.5 mg mL−1 with morphine was adminstered to all patients for three postoperative days. No intergroup differences were found regarding pain at rest and mobilization. The requirement for additional analgesics was similar in both groups as well as peak expiratory flow. Thoracic epidural analgesia that had already been induced before surgery, and was continued into the postoperative period, does not seem to add any advantage regarding pain relief and lung function compared with thoracic epidural analgesia instituted in the immediate postoperative period.