We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Social Determinants of Health (SDOH) greatly influence health outcomes. SDOH surveys, such as the Assessing Circumstances & Offering Resources for Needs (ACORN) survey, have been developed to screen for SDOH in Veterans. The purpose of this study is to determine the terminological representation of the ACORN survey, to aid in natural language processing (NLP).
Methods:
Each ACORN survey question was read to determine its concepts. Next, Solor was searched for each of the concepts and for the appropriate attributes. If no attributes or concepts existed, they were proposed. Then, each question’s concepts and attributes were arranged into subject-relation-object triples.
Results:
Eleven unique attributes and 18 unique concepts were proposed. These results demonstrate a gap in representing SDOH with terminologies. We believe that using these new concepts and relations will improve NLP, and thus, the care provided to Veterans.
Sexual dysfunctions are associated with multiple medical and psychiatric disorders, as well as pharmacotherapies used to treat these disorders. Although sexual dysfunctions negatively affect both quality of life and treatment adherence, patients infrequently volunteer these symptoms and clinicians do not pose directed questions to determine their presence or severity. This issue is especially important in psychiatric patients, for whom most common psychotropics may cause sexual dysfunctions (antidepressants, antipsychotics, anxiolytics and mood-stabilising agents). There is limited literature addressing benzodiazepines, and alprazolam in particular.
Aims
To report dose-dependent alprazolam anorgasmia.
Method
Case analysis with PubMed literature review.
Results
A 30-year-old male psychiatric patient presented with new-onset anorgasmia in the context of asymptomatic generalised anxiety disorder, social anxiety, panic disorder with agoraphobia, obsessive–compulsive disorder, major depression in remission, and attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder treated with escitalopram 10 mg q.a.m., gabapentin 1000 mg total daily dose, lisdexamfetamine dimesylate 70 mg q.a.m., nortriptyline 60 mg q.h.s. and alprazolam extended-release 2.5 mg total daily dose. All psychotropic doses had been constant for >6 months excluding alprazolam, which was titrated from 1 mg to 2.5 mg total daily dose. The patient denied any sexual dysfunction with alprazolam at 1 mg q.d. and 1 mg b.i.d. Within 1 week of increasing alprazolam to 2.5 mg total daily dose, the patient reported anorgasmia. Anorgasmia was alprazolam dose-dependent, as anorgasmia resolved with reduced weekend dosing (1 mg b.i.d. Saturday/1.5 mg total daily dose Sunday).
Conclusions
Sexual dysfunction is an important adverse effect negatively influencing therapeutic outcome. This case reports alprazolam-induced dose-dependent anorgasmia. Clinicians/patients should be aware of this adverse effect. Routine sexual histories are indicated.
Despite the extensive literature assessing associations between religiosity/spirituality and health, few studies have investigated the clinical applicability of this evidence. The purpose of this paper was to assess the impact of religious/spiritual interventions (RSI) through randomized clinical trials (RCTs).
Method.
A systematic review was performed in the following databases: PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, PsycINFO, Cochrane Collaboration, Embase and SciELO. Through the use of a Boolean expression, articles were included if they: (i) investigated mental health outcomes; (ii) had a design consistent with RCTs. We excluded protocols involving intercessory prayer or distance healing. The study was conducted in two phases by reading: (1) title and abstracts; (2) full papers and assessing their methodological quality. Then, a meta-analysis was carried out.
Results.
Through this method, 4751 papers were obtained, of which 23 remained included. The meta-analysis showed significant effects of RSI on anxiety general symptoms (p < 0.001) and in subgroups: meditation (p < 0.001); psychotherapy (p = 0.02); 1 month of follow-up (p < 0.001); and comparison groups with interventions (p < 0.001). Two significant differences were found in depressive symptoms: between 1 and 6 months and comparison groups with interventions (p = 0.05). In general, studies have shown that RSI decreased stress, alcoholism and depression.
Conclusions.
RCTs on RSI showed additional benefits including reduction of clinical symptoms (mainly anxiety). The diversity of protocols and outcomes associated with a lack of standardization of interventions point to the need for further studies evaluating the use of religiosity/spirituality as a complementary treatment in health care.
Facilitating efficiency and safety, triage is the process by which multiple patients are rapidly assessed for risk and queued for care by the emergency department (ED) providers. Before conducting an assessment and formulating a treatment plan with psychiatric patients in the ED, clinicians are encouraged to obtain pre-arrival patient information whenever possible. Ambulatory patients with psychiatric complaints may present to triage alone or arrive with family or friends. It is advisable to have a protocol for determining the location of initial triage based on the circumstances of arrival. Continual reassessment of patient status is critical for clinical care. At various points in this chapter, the movement of patients from one clinical environment to another is discussed. Each transition includes an attendant hand-off between clinical providers. At times, a patient is sent to the emergency department en route to an inpatient psychiatric unit, for example, from a psychiatric clinic.
Heavy menstrual bleeding interferes with a woman's physical, social and emotional quality of life. The National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) guideline on heavy menstrual bleeding provides the most up-to- date evidence-based recommendations both on provision of care and the areas that need to be researched further. All health professionals undertaking surgical or radiological procedures to diagnose and treat heavy menstrual bleeding should demonstrate their technical and counselling competence, either during their training or during subsequent practice. Clinical governance policies should be able to monitor treatment complications, patient choice, patient satisfaction and uptake rate. Staff involvement in risk management exercises should be monitored to ensure that appropriate incident forms have been completed and that the staffs involved have received feedback. NICE has suggested several research recommendations in this important aspect of women's health.
Venlafaxine has shown benefit in the treatment of depression and pain. Worldwide data are extensively lacking investigating the outcome of chronic pain patients with depressive symptoms treated by venlafaxine in the primary care setting. This observational study aimed to elucidate the efficacy of venlafaxine and its prescription by Swiss primary care physicians and psychiatrists in patients with chronic pain and depressive symptomatology.
Subjects and methods.
We studied 505 patients with depressive symptoms suffering from chronic pain in a prospective naturalistic Swiss community based observational trial with venlafaxine in primary care. These patients have been treated with venlafaxine by 122 physicians, namely psychiatrists, general practitioners, and internists.
Results.
On average, patients were treated with 143 ± 75 mg (0–450 mg) venlafaxine daily for a follow-up of three months. Venlafaxine proved to be beneficial in the treatment of both depressive symptoms and chronic pain.
Discussion.
Although side effects were absent in most patients, physicians might have frequently omitted satisfactory response rate of depression by underdosing venlafaxine. Our results reflect the complexity in the treatment of chronic pain in patients with depressive symptoms in primary care.
Conclusion.
Further randomized dose-finding studies are needed to learn more about the appropriate dosage in treating depression and comorbid pain with venlafaxine.
Edited by
Frederick P. Rivara, Harborview Injury Prevention and Research Center, Seattle,Peter Cummings, Harborview Injury Prevention and Research Center, Seattle,Thomas D. Koepsell, Harborview Injury Prevention and Research Center, Seattle,David C. Grossman, Harborview Injury Prevention and Research Center, Seattle,Ronald V. Maier, Harborview Injury Prevention and Research Center, Seattle
This chapter explores the uses of case series data for the assessment of clinical care, as well as understanding the etiology of injuries. An extension of the case series is the trauma registry. The main difficulties with analysis of case series data, in general, and with trauma registry data in particular, are in attempting to make generalizations about all injury victims and about injury risk factors from patients admitted to one hospital. When attempting to obtain data on the full spectrum of injuries occurring in a given community or area, supplemental data on minor injuries will be needed. Trauma registries are an extension of case series and offer many advantages to both clinical care and the study of injury mechanisms. However, for both case series and trauma registry studies, considerable caution must be exercised in attempting to make inferences about injury risk factors and about injury characteristics of the population.
Recommend this
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this to your organisation's collection.