Objectives: Single-vessel bypass can often be accomplished through
less invasive techniques than conventional coronary artery bypass graft (CABG)
at substantially lower cost. We undertook a study to empirically determine the
cost savings associated with one such technique, left anterior small
thoracotomy (LAST).
Methods: Reviewing medical and billing records, we measured the
difference in hospitalization costs between two methods of coronary bypass
surgery. The study groups consisted of 50 patients who underwent LAST and 28
who underwent single-vessel conventional CABG during 1995 and 1996. A
subsequent validation sample of 50 patients who underwent LAST was also
analyzed. Hospitalization costs were estimated using a relative value unit
methodology and were risk-adjusted for both perioperative risk factors and
changes in operating room technology.
Results: Risk-adjusted hospitalization costs for those undergoing
LAST were $9,510 and $12,546 for the CABG control subjects (p <
.01), with differences in surgical costs reflecting over 62% of this overall
difference. Differences in average length of stay were under a half-day (10.0
for LAST vs. 10.46 for CABG). Only one inpatient fatality was reported;
therefore, no inference regarding mortality differences could be made.
Conclusions: LAST is substantially less costly than conventional
surgery, and the savings are potentially greater if hospital length of stay is
reduced to a clinically recommended time of 2 days.