We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
This single-centre, retrospective cohort study was conducted to investigate the predictors of early peritoneal dialysis initiation in newborns and young infants undergoing cardiac surgery.
Methods:
There were fifty-seven newborns and young infants. All subjects received peritoneal dialysis catheter after completion of the cardiopulmonary bypass. Worsening post-operative (post-op) positive fluid balance and oliguria (<1 ml/kg/hour) despite furosemide were the clinical indications to start early peritoneal dialysis (peritoneal dialysis +). Demographic, clinical, and laboratory data were collected from the pre-operative, intra-operative, and immediately post-operative periods.
Results:
Baseline demographic data were indifferent except that peritoneal dialysis + group had more newborns. Pre-operative serum creatinine was higher for peritoneal dialysis + group (p = 0.025). Peritoneal dialysis + group had longer cardiopulmonary bypass time (p = 0.044), longer aorta cross-clamp time (p = 0.044), and less urine output during post-op 24 hours (p = 0.008). In the univariate logistic regression model, pre-op serum creatinine was significantly associated with higher odds of being in peritoneal dialysis + (p = 0.021) and post-op systolic blood pressure (p = 0.018) and post-op mean arterial pressure (p=0.001) were significantly associated with reduced odds of being in peritoneal dialysis + (p = 0.018 and p = 0.001, respectively). Post-op mean arterial pressure showed a statistically significant association adjusted odds ratio = 0.89, 95% confidence interval [0.81, 0.96], p = 0.004) with peritoneal dialysis + in multivariate analysis after adjusting for age at surgery.
Conclusions:
In our single-centre cohort, pre-op serum creatinine, post-op systolic blood pressure, and mean arterial pressure demonstrated statistically significant association with peritoneal dialysis +. This finding may help to better risk stratify newborns and young infants for early peritoneal dialysis start following cardiac surgery.
The use of peritoneal catheters for prophylactic dialysis or drainage to prevent fluid overload after neonatal cardiac surgery is common in some centres; however, the multi-centre variability and details of peritoneal catheter use are not well described.
Methods:
Twenty-two-centre NEonatal and Pediatric Heart Renal Outcomes Network (NEPHRON) study to describe multi-centre peritoneal catheter use after STAT category 3–5 neonatal cardiac surgery using cardiopulmonary bypass. Patient characteristics and acute kidney injury/fluid outcomes for six post-operative days are described among three cohorts: peritoneal catheter with dialysis, peritoneal catheter with passive drainage, and no peritoneal catheter.
Results:
Of 1490 neonates, 471 (32%) had an intraoperative peritoneal catheter placed; 177 (12%) received prophylactic dialysis and 294 (20%) received passive drainage. Sixteen (73%) centres used peritoneal catheter at some frequency, including six centres in >50% of neonates. Four centres utilised prophylactic peritoneal dialysis. Time to post-operative dialysis initiation was 3 hours [1, 5] with the duration of 56 hours [37, 90]; passive drainage cohort drained for 92 hours [64, 163]. Peritoneal catheter were more common among patients receiving pre-operative mechanical ventilation, single ventricle physiology, and higher complexity surgery. There was no association with adverse events. Serum creatinine and daily fluid balance were not clinically different on any post-operative day. Mortality was similar.
Conclusions:
In neonates undergoing complex cardiac surgery, peritoneal catheter use is not rare, with substantial variability among centres. Peritoneal catheters are used more commonly with higher surgical complexity. Adverse event rates, including mortality, are not different with peritoneal catheter use. Fluid overload and creatinine-based acute kidney injury rates are not different in peritoneal catheter cohorts.
A 33-year-old nulligravid woman is undergoing hysteroscopic removal of a 5 cm FIGO type 1 submucosal myoma due to heavy menstrual bleeding and mild anemia. She is otherwise in good health and has no significant medical or surgical history. She is not on any medications and denies drug allergy. The patient receives general anesthesia without difficulty. The procedure commences with use of a fluid management system and a bipolar resectoscope to remove myoma fragments. Approximately 30 minutes into the surgery, the anesthesiologist becomes concerned due to sudden decrease of oxygen saturation to 87%. The total fluid deficit is approaching 2300 mL. The anesthesiologist administers intravenous (IV) furosemide and asks the surgeon to terminate the procedure. Several minutes later, oxygen saturations increase to 92%. The patient is awakened from anesthesia and proceeds to the recovery room in a stable condition.
Recommend this
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this to your organisation's collection.