This study compares empirical and topology optimization methods for reducing gear body mass. Specimens produced via empirical guidelines and topology optimization were compared to referent full-disc gear, focusing on stresses and deformations. Values were determined numerically (Ansys was used) and the calculation method was verified using ISO 6336. The empirical approach exhibited substantial increases in stress and deformation while topology optimization method had promising outcomes. While decreasing mass, it also diminished tooth root stress on the tensile side by 17.1%.
