Aim: To evaluate patients' satisfaction with a psychiatric day hospital in the West Galway Catchments area.

Study design: This is a cross-sectional study. Methods: This study was undertaken by using a 33-items questionnaire for 44 patients who attended the day hospital. SPSS version-12 was used for collecting and applying tests to the data, Fisher's exact test was used to analyse the data as sample size is small and P<0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results are also presented in the form of descriptive analysis including percentages and frequencies.

Results: Only 37 out of the 44 patients returned the questionnaires. Among the participants were 61% (n=22) male and 38% (n=15) female. The patients were mostly satisfied with the services available at the day hospital, except the waiting period for a first appointment. There was no significant (P=0.11) gender difference in terms of patients' satisfaction with the day hospital service. The age group, 45 years and above, were less satisfied (P=0.02) with the availability of a comfortable room for counselling, as compared to the younger age group. The patients did not like to tell others that they were attending the day hospital. The results were comparable with previous published patient satisfaction surveys using the same questionnaire by the Health Research Board, except that the patients in the present survey were more satisfied with the waiting area and availability of counselling.

Conclusions: Patients are mostly satisfied with the West Galway day hospital services.

The older patients (45 years and above) are not satisfied with the counselling room, and therefore further investigations are needed to ascertain their requirements for a counselling room. Patients are more satisfied with the waiting area and availability of counselling compared to the findings of other similar studies conducted in Ireland. Resources are needed to be allocated to the day hospital services.

Objective — The implementation of a simple methodology to estimate full costs of services provided by a public mental health centre. Setting. CPS (NHS Mental Centre) Ussl 35, Magenta, Lombardy Region. Method — To estimate full costs of 16 types of service we followed a two step procedure. The first step was to estimate all costs attributable to the CPS. In the second one, we allocated this estimate to each type of service provided. We attributed to the CPS the following cost items: personnel, utilities (telephone, electricity, water, heating and cleaning), land & building, transports (for services provided outside the clinic) and a share of general cost of the USSL to which the CPS belongs. Full cost of each service was then calculated on the base of the yearly number of services provided and the time spent by each health professional. Results — In 1995, the CPS provided 14, 562 services. Total costs amounted to L 1,356 million, and more than three quarters of this amount was attributable to the personnel working at the CPS. Unit costs ranged from L 5,300 (drug administration) to L 442,400 (family therapy involving two professionals for 90 minutes) The unit cost of psychiatric visits, psychologist consultations and nurse domiciliary visits were L 105,300, L 106,600 and L 78,000, respectively. Conclusions — This approach requires accessible data and is relatively simple to manage. Some refinements are required, especially to improve the methodology for the determination and the allocation of overheads. However, we are convinced that this cost accounting procedure provides acceptable estimates of the services provided by the CPS. These estimates suggest that charges to be used to fund NHS providers may be too low, especially if fee-for-service will be the main funding source.

Aims – To present the psychometric properties of the “Consumer–constructed Scale to measure empowerment” (Rogers et al., 1997 ) Italian version. Methods – After briefly recollecting “history”, contents and psychometric features of the original scale, proceeding from Stratico & Degli Esposti's translation (2002), in this paper, the psychometric properties of the Italian version are described. The text of the instrument has been brought for discussion in a users' focus group and subsequently tested for reliability study; a second focus group followed to reach the definitive Italian version. Results – The Italian version of the Scale, consists of 28 items, showed an adequate internal consistency and reliability both for the whole scale and for most of the items, which have shown to have also good discriminative capacity. Conclusions – SESM can be an useful instrument to give empiric evidence supporting empowerment concept. Considering the results, it can be a qualifying and irreplaceable instrument for “empowered condition” evaluation.

Declaration of Interest: no grants and financial support received for the study.

Aims – The study aims to evaluate the frequency of association between Axis I and II disorders according to DSMIVTR criteria and obesity, and use of mental health services in a clinical sample of patients attending a centre for the diagnosis and treatment of Obesity. Methods – 150 consecutive patients (32 Males, 118 females, mean age 44.614.3 yrs; mean BMI 35.46.2) were interviewed by means of SCID I and SCID II. Results – Lifetime Prevalence of Axis I disorders was 58% (males 50%; females 61%); the highest prevalence rate was found for Anxiety Disorders (approx 35%), whilst 30% of subjects were affected by Mood disorders, chiefly Major Depression (20%), and 18% by Eating Disorders. 28% of obese patients presented a Personality Disorder, 23% of patients being affected both by an Axis I and Axis II disorder. Mood Disorders, in particular Major Depression, were significantly prevalent among female obese. 50% of females and approx 37% males included in the sample had contacted mental health units for treatment. Conclusion – Data obtained in the present study confirm the high prevalence rates of mental disorders in obese patients seeking treatment. Specialist units should therefore include thorough psychiatric evaluation of patients as a routine practice.

Declaration of Interest: The study was supported by a research grant by University of Cagliari (ex 60% funding, financial year 2006); the authors declare no conflict of interest.