Palliative care (PC) faces a workforce crisis. Seriously ill patients surpass the supply of PC cliniciansin their work clinicians face repeated loss and extreme suffering which can have deleterious consequences, such as burnout and attrition. We urgently need interventions that foster thriving communities in this emotionally complex environment. Storytelling represents a promising path forward. In response to widespread loneliness and moral distress among PC clinicians before, during, and after the early months of the COVID-19 pandemic, we created the Palliative Story Exchange (PSE), a storytelling intervention to build community, decrease isolation, and help clinicians rediscover the shared meaning in their work. This paper discusses this novel intervention and initial program evaluation data demonstrating the PSE’s impact thus far.

Participants voluntarily complete a post-then-pre wellness survey reflecting on their experience.

Thus far, over 1,000 participants have attended a PSE. In the fall of 2022, we began distributing a post-then-pre-evaluation survey. To date, 130 interprofessional participants from practice locations across 10 different countries completed the survey. Responses demonstrate an increase in the connection that participants felt toward their work and the larger palliative care community after attending a PSE. Further, more than half of all free-text responses include terms such as, “meaningful,” “healing,” “powerful,” and “universal,” to describe their participation.

Training programs and healthcare organizations use the humanities to support clinician wellness and improve patient care. The PSE builds upon this work through a novel combination of storytelling, community co-creation using reflection, and shared meaning making. Initial survey data demonstrates that after attending a PSE, participants feel increased meaning in their work, in the significance of their own stories, and connection with the PC community. Moving forward, we seek to expand our community of practice, host a facilitator leadership course, and rigorously study the PSE’s impact on clinician wellness outcomes.

This pilot study aimed to assess the feasibility and impact of a narrative medicine group for patients receiving palliative care.

This pilot study aimed to assess the feasibility of a six-session, physician-led narrative medicine group for patients receiving palliative care. Ten patients were recruited by their outpatient providers. Symptom severity and patient dignity scores were collected pre-intervention, at the mid-point, and post-intervention using the Patient Dignity Inventory (PDI) and Edmonton Symptom Assessment Survey (ESAS). Qualitative reports of pain, expectations, and anticipated challenges were collected before the intervention. Participant interviews were conducted after the intervention to assess overall experience in the group, challenges experienced, recommendations for future endeavors, and general feedback.

No significant changes in PDI or ESAS scores were observed at baseline, 3 weeks, and 6 weeks. Participants reported overall satisfaction, with 8 of 9 participants stating they “strongly agree” they would participate in the group again and recommend the group to others. Qualitative responses indicated benefits in the realms of relating to other patients, subjective reduction in pain, and relieving feelings of isolation.

A narrative medicine group for ambulatory patients receiving palliative care appeared to be both beneficial and feasible when delivered through a virtual format. A randomized trial with a larger sample is needed to fully assess the impacts of engaging in narrative work on symptom burden, survival, and quality of life.

We all have the innate ability to tell our story and the way we do it can determine the impact that each problem has on our lives. Storytelling can play a critical role in psychiatric practice and, from this premise, a new way of practicing psychiatry has recently emerged: narrative psychiatry.

The objective is to offer a unified vision of narrative psychiatry, providing details on the historical and academic context of this approach.

A narrative-type literary review focused on narrative psychiatry will be presented.

Narrative psychiatry is an innovative clinical approach in line within narrative medicine and with a specific subtype of postmodern psychotherapy, the narrative therapy of Michael White and David Epston. This novel way of practicing psychiatry arises from critical movements within the discipline but it is an integrative and collaborative perspective: the position of each problem in the patient’s personal narrative is discussed and different therapeutic proposals are addressed, including for instance psychotropic drugs. This integrative posture gives the narrative psychiatrist enough flexibility to equally integrate the scientific achievements of biological psychiatry and the humanizing component of narrative practice. In this literature review, the key tools proposed by the main narrative psychiatrists worldwide for the narrative clinical interview will be exposed.

Narrative psychiatry is a novel approach that narrows the therapeutic relationship and that puts in evidence the history of resistance of the consultant, healing through its own storytelling.

No co-productive narrative synthesis of system-level facilitators and barriers to personal recovery in mental illness has been undertaken.

To clarify system-level facilitators and barriers to personal recovery of people with mental illness.

Qualitative study guided by thematic analysis. Data were collected through one focus group, which involved seven service users and three professionals. This group had 11 meetings, each lasting 2 h at a local research institute, between July 2016 to January 2018.

The analysis yielded three themes: barriers inhibiting positive interaction within personal relationship networks, roots of barriers from mental health systems and the social cultural context, and possible solutions to address the roots. Barriers were acknowledged as those related to sense of safety, locus of control within oneself and reunion with self. The roots of barriers were recognised within mental health services, including system without trauma sensitivity, lack of advocacy support and limited access to psychosocial approaches. Roots from social cultural context were also found. There were no narratives relating to facilitators. A possible solution was to address the roots from systems. Social cultural change was called for that makes personalised goals most valued, with an inclusive design that overcomes stigma, to achieve an open and accepting community.

The analysis yielded system-level barriers specific to each recovery process. Roots of barriers that need transformation to facilitate personal recovery were identified within mental health services. Social interventions should be further explored to translate the suggested social cultural changes into action.