Tracheal intubation is a high-risk intervention for exposure to airborne infective pathogens, including the novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). During the recent pandemic, personal protective equipment (PPE) was essential to protect staff during intubation but is recognized to make the practical conduct of anesthesia and intubation more difficult. In the early phase of the coronavirus pandemic, some simple alterations were made to the emergency anesthesia standard operating procedure (SOP) of a prehospital critical care service to attempt to maintain high intubation success rates despite the challenges posed by wearing PPE. This retrospective observational cohort study aims to compare first-pass intubation success rates before and after the introduction of PPE and an altered SOP.

A retrospective observational cohort study was conducted from January 1, 2019 through August 30, 2021. The retrospective analysis used prospectively collected data using prehospital electronic patient records. Anonymized data were held in Excel (v16.54) and analyzed using IBM SPSS Statistics (v28). Patient inclusion criteria were those of all ages who received a primary tracheal intubation attempt outside the hospital by critical care teams. March 27, 2020 was the date from which the SOP changed to mandatory COVID-19 SOP including Level 3 PPE – this date is used to separate the cohort groups.

Data were analyzed from 1,266 patients who received primary intubations by the service. The overall first-pass intubation success rate was 89.7% and the overall intubation success rate was 99.9%. There was no statistically significant difference in first-pass success rate between the two groups: 90.3% in the pre-COVID-19 group (n = 546) and 89.3% in the COVID-19 group (n = 720); Pearson chi-square 0.329; P = .566. In addition, there was no statistical difference in overall intubation success rate between groups: 99.8% in the pre-COVID-19 group and 100.0% in the COVID-19 group; Pearson chi-square 1.32; P = .251.

Non-drug-assisted intubations were more than twice as likely to require multiple attempts in both the pre-COVID-19 group (n = 546; OR = 2.15; 95% CI, 1.19-3.90; P = .01) and in the COVID-19 group (n = 720; OR = 2.5; 95% CI, 1.5-4.1; P = <.001).

This study presents simple changes to a prehospital intubation SOP in response to COVID-19 which included mandatory use of PPE, the first intubator always being the most experienced clinician, and routine first use of video laryngoscopy (VL). These changes allowed protection of the clinical team while successfully maintaining the first-pass and overall success rates for prehospital tracheal intubation.

This study was focused on reviewing the emergency and disaster preparedness of European hospital pharmacists.

An online survey based on International Pharmaceutical Federation (FIP) guidelines for natural disasters was sent to European hospital pharmacies, with the support of the European Association of Hospital Pharmacists. Additional questions were added about the characteristics of respondents, as well as preparedness and experience of manmade disasters. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze the results.

Hospital pharmacists in France (20%) and Spain (19%) returned most of the 306 questionnaires completed in 27 countries. Half of the respondents had analyzed their regional disaster risk, but 65% had never practiced emergency drills. Fifteen percent of respondents had experienced at least 1 major emergency or disaster event in the last 5 years. Fifty-six percent of those respondents who experienced a disaster subsequently created and promoted internal standard operating procedures (SOPs) for future emergencies, versus 23% for those who had not experienced disasters. Among pharmacists having experienced disasters, 40% organized a post-disaster debriefing to improve their future response.

Results highlighted that most European hospital pharmacists were not fully compliant with FIP guidelines. However, respondents who had experienced disasters were more likely to create and promote SOPs for future disasters. Further worldwide analysis and benchmarking are necessary, and FIP guidelines should be more strongly promoted.

Mass-gathering events require varying types and amounts of medical resources to deal with patient presentations as well as careful planning for environmental health management. The Holy Shroud Exhibition was hosted in Torino, Italy, between April and May 2010. The venue was a unique mass-gathering event which lasted several weeks. It was held in a limited area in the center of the city and it was attended by a large and heterogeneous population. A dedicated Health Care Service was created for the event.

This study is a retrospective analysis of clinical presentations of patients who were managed by the Medical Services during the event. The main study outcomes included Patient Presentation Rate (PPR), type of injuries and illnesses, and the Transport to Hospital Rate (TTHR).

The PPR and TTHR were both low (0.27 and 0.039 respectively). The majority of patients presented with low severity codes and no sudden cardiac death (SCD) or cardiac arrest occurred. Cardiac and trauma emergencies were most frequent categories of presentation. A number of pediatric patients (19.37%) were treated by the event Medical Service. Approximately two million persons participated in the 40-day event.

The experience for this 40-day event supported having an on-site, organized, dedicated Medical Service that decreased overcrowding of the local Emergency Medical System and hospitals. It is recommended that, for such events, there be recruitment of emergency physicians with experience in mass-gathering events, recruitment of pediatricians, and training for professionals during the planning process.

BortolinM, UllaM, BonoA, FerreriE, TomatisM, SgambetterraS. Holy Shroud Exhibition 2010: Health Services During a 40-Day Mass-Gathering Event. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2013;28(3):1-6.