Objectives: To compare outcome attributes of three available
technologies for stem cell transplantation—bone marrow
transplantation (BM), peripheral blood cell transplantation (PB), and
cord blood transplantation (CB). To compare the cost per recipient for
the three technologies, incorporating all donor and antigen matching
functions, as well as the transplantation procedures.
Methods: Review of relevant literature using the CancerLit and
HealthSTAR databases (plus earlier searches of MEDLINE and Embase) to
summarize outcome differences. Estimations of cost per transplant
using models drawing on Canadian experience.
Results: The literature review indicated that PB may have a
modest advantage over BM in terms of outcomes. The literature
indicated that CB has longer engraftment times (although this may be
due to inadequate controls). Our modeling exercise indicated that
costs for PB and BM are similar. CB has a higher cost per recipient,
due in large part to the higher testing costs for every donated unit.
Conclusions: Current literature is inadequate to provide an
outcomes comparison of CB, PB, and BM. Viewed from a system-wide
perspective, CB is a higher cost technique. However, PB and CB are
emerging as technologies, and so our results should be viewed
alongside the notion that there may be a steep learning curve in these
technologies.