We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Given a three-valued definition of validity, which choice of three-valued truth tables for the connectives can ensure that the resulting logic coincides exactly with classical logic? We give an answer to this question for the five monotonic consequence relations 
$st$, 
$ss$, 
$tt$, 
$ss\cap tt$, and 
$ts$, when the connectives are negation, conjunction, and disjunction. For 
$ts$ and 
$ss\cap tt$ the answer is trivial (no scheme works), and for 
$ss$ and 
$tt$ it is straightforward (they are the collapsible schemes, in which the middle value acts like one of the classical values). For 
$st$, the schemes in question are the Boolean normal schemes that are either monotonic or collapsible.
