Introduction. Tamarind (Tamarindus indica L.) belongs to the Fabaceae family; it is a multipurpose tree with slow growth. In order to help improve its growth and development, we assessed mycorrhizal diversity of tamarind parklands in Senegal. Materials and methods. Three sites of tamarind populations were sampled for each agro-ecological zone in Senegal: the Sahelian zone (i), Sahelo-Sudan zone (ii) and Sudan zone (iii). Soil and root samples were collected in each site and used for arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) spore isolation and root colonization assessment. We identified the mycorrhizal fungi from spore collections and evaluated the root mycorrhization rate, defined as percentage of roots colonized according to agro-ecological zones. Results and discussion. The results did not reveal a specific AM fungal strain associated with tamarind plants. Three arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) were identified from spores on the genus level: Glomus, Scutellospora and Acaulospora. Tamarind sites with sandy soil texture (70–90%) and located in dry areas (Sahel and Sudano-Sahel zones) were shown to be rich in mycorrhizal propagules. High densities of soil AM propagules evaluated with the Most Probable Number method (MPN) were found in Niokhoul (1100 propagules per 50 g of soil), Sakal (790 propagules per 50 g of soil) and Mbassis (780 propagules per 50 g of soil). However, higher mycorrhizal colonization (11%) was observed in the Sahel agro-ecological zone compared with the Sudano-Sahelian and Sahelian zones (3%) of Senegal. Conclusion. Our study explored natural AMF diversity as a starting point to develop inocula to be used in commercial nursery production of tamarinds.

Introduction. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) and plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) can be considered important rhizospheric beneficial microorganisms. Their use as biocontrol strategies against soilborne pathogens such as nematodes should be taken into account. However, optimal management of soil microbiota communities is not easy because of the high specificity involved in these types of interactions. The aim of our study was to determine whether the combined inoculation of two AMF species and a Bacillus consortium based on three strains previously described as PGPR in other crops were able to reduce nematode infection and damage on papaya. Materials and methods. Papaya seedlings were inoculated with two AMF isolates (Glomus mosseae or G. manihotis) at the beginning of the nursery phase. Once the mycorrhizal symbiosis was established, a Bacillus consortium was applied. Nematode inoculum was applied 20 d after transplanting to individual pots. Plants were harvested 160 d after nematode inoculation. Results. In terms of plant development and nutrition, benefits due to AMF inoculation persisted in the presence of PGPR. However, the effect of dual inoculation was different, depending on the Glomus species. This positive effect was also evident in plants with nematode. Meloidogyne infection was significantly reduced in mycorrhizal plants. However, the addition of PGPR does not seem to improve the results of AMF single treatments in terms of nematode infection. Conclusion. Dual application of AMF and PGPR must be considered for papaya threatened by the root-knot nematode, although a previous screening should be done in order to select the best microbe combination to optimise results.