No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Emotions in the development of moral norms within cooperative relationships
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 11 September 2019
Abstract
We support May's criticism of attempts to reduce morality to being primarily based on evolved emotional reactions. However, we question the clarity and consistence of his own position and suggest taking a developmental approach. We focus on providing a developmental approach to the role of emotions in the social origin of moral norms.
- Type
- Open Peer Commentary
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2019
References
Carpendale, J. I. M. (2000) Kohlberg and Piaget on stages and moral reasoning. Developmental Review 20:181–205.Google Scholar
Carpendale, J. I. M. (2009) Piaget's theory of moral development. In: The Cambridge companion to Piaget, ed. Müller, U., Carpendale, J. I. M & Smith, L., pp. 270–86. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Carpendale, J. I. M. (2018) Communication as the coordination of activity: The implications of philosophical preconceptions for theories of the development of communication. In: Advancing developmental science: Philosophy, theory, and method, ed. Dick, A. S. & Müller, U., pp. 145–56. Routledge.Google Scholar
Carpendale, J. I. M., Hammond, S. I. & Atwood, S. (2013) A relational developmental systems approach to moral development. In: Embodiment and epigenesis: Theoretical and methodological issues in understanding the role of biology within the relational developmental system: Advances in child development and behavior, vol. 45, ed. Lerner, R. M. & Benson, J. B., pp. 105–33. Academic Press.Google Scholar
Carpendale, J. I. M. & Krebs, D. L. (1995) Variations in level of moral judgment as a function of type of dilemma and moral choice. Journal of Personality 63:289–313.Google Scholar
Carpendale, J. I. M., Sokol, B. & Müller, U. (2010) Is a neuroscience of morality possible? In: Developmental social cognitive neuroscience, ed. Zelazo, P., Chandler, M. & Crone, E., pp. 289–311. Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Fisher, S. E. (2006) Tangled webs: Tracing the connections between genes and cognition. Cognition 101:270–97.Google Scholar
Göckeritz, S., Schmidt, M. F. H. & Tomasello, M. (2014) Young children's creation and transmission of social norms. Cognitive Development 30:81–95.Google Scholar
Habermas, J. (1983/1990) Moral consciousness and communicative action. MIT Press. (Original work published 1983)Google Scholar
Haidt, J. (2001) The emotional dog and its rational tail: A social intuitionist approach to moral judgment. Psychological Review 108:814–34.Google Scholar
Kohlberg, L. (1981) Essays in moral development: The philosophy of moral development, vol. 1. Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Lickliter, R. & Honeycutt, H. (2009) Rethinking epigenesis and evolution in light of developmental science. In: Oxford handbook of developmental behavioral neuroscience, ed. Blumberg, M. S., Freeman, J. H. & Robinson, S. R., pp. 30–49. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lickliter, R. & Honeycutt, H. (2015) Biology, development, and human systems. In: Theory and method: Handbook of child psychology and developmental science, vol. 1, 7th ed., ed. Lerner, R. (editor-in-chief), Overton, W. F. & Molenaar, P. C. M., pp. 162–207. Wiley Blackwell.Google Scholar
Mameli, M. & Bateson, P. (2006) Innateness and the sciences. Biology and Philosophy 21:155–88.Google Scholar
Mead, G. H. (1934) Mind, self and society: From the standpoint of a social behaviorist. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Meaney, M. J. (2010) Epigenetics and the biological definition of gene x environment interactions. Child Development 81:41–79.Google Scholar
Piaget, J. (1932/1965) The moral judgement of the child, trans. Gabain, M.. Free Press/Harcourt. (Original work published in 1932.)Google Scholar
Stiles, J., Brown, T. T., Haist, F. & Jernigan, T. L. (2015) Brain and cognitive development. In: Cognitive processes: Handbook of child psychology and developmental science, vol. 2, 7th ed., ed. Lerner, R. (editor-in-chief), Liben, L. & Müller, U., pp. 9–62. Wiley Blackwell.Google Scholar
Wright, D. (1982) Piaget's theory of moral development. In: Jean Piaget: Consensus and controversy, ed. Modgil, S. & Modgil, C., pp. 207–17. Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
Target article
Précis of Regard for Reason in the Moral Mind
Related commentaries (21)
Analyzing debunking arguments in moral psychology: Beyond the counterfactual analysis of influence by irrelevant factors
Baselines for human morality should include species typicality, inheritances, culture, practice, and ecological attachment
Cautiously optimistic rationalism may not be cautious enough
Do framing effects debunk moral beliefs?
Emotions in the development of moral norms within cooperative relationships
Humean replies to Regard for Reason
Kantian indifference about moral reason
Moral foundations are not moral propositions
Moral judgment as reasoning by constraint satisfaction
Moral principles in May's Regard for Reason in the Moral Mind
Moral reasoning is the process of asking moral questions and answering them
Moral reasoning performance determines epistemic peerdom
Optimism in unconscious, intuitive morality
Rationalism, optimism, and the moral mind
Rationalization, controversy, and the entanglement of moral-social cognition: A “critical pessimist” take
The faces of pessimism
The social character of moral reasoning
The space between rationalism and sentimentalism: A perspective from moral development
Valuation mechanisms in moral cognition
What is sentimentalism? What is rationalism?
What sentimentalists should say about emotion
Author response
Defending optimistic rationalism: A reply to commentators