Article contents
The history of the nature/nurture issue
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 24 October 2012
Abstract
It is worthy to supplement Charney with two historical issues: (1) There were two rival trends in the rebirth of genetic thought in the 1960s: the universal and the variation related. This traditional duality suggested that heredity cannot be equated with genetic determinism. (2) The classical debates and reinterpretation of adoption/twin studies in the 1980s regarding intelligence suggested that the environment had a more active role in unfolding the genetic program.
- Type
- Open Peer Commentary
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2012
References
Chappaz, G., Coste, J. P. & Chappaz, F. (1980) Intelligence et hérédité. Nouvelles Editions Rationalistes.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1959) Review of B. F. Skinner's verbal behavior. Language
35:26–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1972b) Problems of knowledge and freedom: The Russell lectures. Vintage Books.Google Scholar
Crow, J. F. (1969) Genetic theories and influences: Comments on the value of diversity. Harvard Educational Review
39:301–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hunt, J. McV. (1969) Has compensatory education failed? Has it been attempted?
Harvard Educational Review
39:278–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jablonka, E. & Lamb, M. J. (2002) The changing concept of epigenetics. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences
981:82–96.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jensen, A. (1969) How much can we boost IQ and scholastic achievement?
Harvard Educational Review
39:1–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, W., Penke, L. & Spinath, F. M (2011) Heritability in the era of molecular genetics: Some thoughts for understanding genetic influences on behavioural traits. European Journal of Personality
25:254–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kagan, J. S. (1969) Inadequate evidence and illogical conclusions. Harvard Educational Review
39:274–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kovács, K. & Pléh, C. (2000) Evolution, individual differences and social commitments. PSYCOLOQUY
11:1–4. Available at: http://www.cogsci.ecs.soton.ac.uk/cgi/psyc/newpsy?11.045.Google Scholar
Luria, A. R. (1936) The development of mental functions in twins. Journal of Personality
5:35–47. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.1936.tb02041.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McLafferty, C. L. Jr. (2006) Examining unproven assumptions of Galton's nature-nurture paradigm. American Psychologist
61(2):177–78.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Taylor, H. F. (1980) The IQ game: A methodological inquiry into the heredity-environment controversy. Harvester.Google Scholar
Zazzo, R. (1955) Sur le postulat de la comparabilité dans la methode des jumeaux. Acta Geneticae Medicae et Gemollologiae
4:180–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zazzo, R. (1960) Les jumeaux. Le couple et la personne. Tome I. L'individuation somatique. T. 2. L'individuation psychologique. Presses Universataires de France.Google Scholar
Zazzo, R. (1962) Les jumeaux et la psychologie. Journal de Psychologie Normale et Pathologique
59:181–97.Google Scholar
Zhanks, T-Y. & Meaney, M. J. (2010) Epigenetic and the environmental regulation of the genome and its functions. Annual Review of Psychology
61:439–66.Google Scholar
- 1
- Cited by
Target article
Behavior genetics and postgenomics
Related commentaries (24)
A call for an expanded synthesis of developmental and evolutionary paradigms
A developmental science commentary on Charney's “Behavior genetics and postgenomics”
A straw man's neogenome
Affirmation of a developmental systems approach to genetics
Assumptions in studies of heritability and genotype–phenotype association
Biology trumps statistics in the postgenomic era
Clinicians learn less and less about more and more until they know nothing about everything; researchers learn more and more about less and less until they know everything about nothing: Discuss
Epigenetic regulation of brain-derived neurotrophic factor: Implications in neurodevelopment and behavior
Estimating the actual subject-specific genetic correlations in behavior genetics
From gene activity to behavior (and back again)
Gene-independent heritability of behavioural traits: Don't we also need to rethink the “environment”?
Genetic sensitivity to the environment, across lifetime
Heritability estimates in behavior genetics: Wasn't that station passed long ago?
Is behavioral genetics ‘too-big-to-know’ science?
Is genomics bad for you?
Neogenomic events challenge current models of heritability, neuronal plasticity dynamics, and machine learning
Non-Mendelian etiologic factors in neuropsychiatric illness: Pleiotropy, epigenetics, and convergence
Parental brain and socioeconomic epigenetic effects in human development
Postgenomics and genetic essentialism
Preventing a paradigm shift: A plea for the computational genome
Relational developmental systems: A paradigm for developmental science in the postgenomic era
The fate of heritability in the postgenomic era
The history of the nature/nurture issue
Twin and family studies are actually more important than ever
Author response
Humans, fruit flies, and automatons