Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-11T01:35:46.183Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The history of the nature/nurture issue

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 October 2012

Csaba Pléh*
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Károly Eszterházy College, Eger H-3300, Hungary. pleh.csaba@ektf.huwww.plehcsaba.hu

Abstract

It is worthy to supplement Charney with two historical issues: (1) There were two rival trends in the rebirth of genetic thought in the 1960s: the universal and the variation related. This traditional duality suggested that heredity cannot be equated with genetic determinism. (2) The classical debates and reinterpretation of adoption/twin studies in the 1980s regarding intelligence suggested that the environment had a more active role in unfolding the genetic program.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2012 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Block, N. J. & Dworkin, G. (1976) The IQ controversy. Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
Chappaz, G., Coste, J. P. & Chappaz, F. (1980) Intelligence et hérédité. Nouvelles Editions Rationalistes.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1959) Review of B. F. Skinner's verbal behavior. Language 35:2658.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1965) Aspects of a theory of syntax. MIT Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1968) Language and mind. Holt.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1972a) Psychology and ideology. Cognition 1(1):1146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1972b) Problems of knowledge and freedom: The Russell lectures. Vintage Books.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1988) Language and problems of knowledge. MIT Press.Google Scholar
Crow, J. F. (1969) Genetic theories and influences: Comments on the value of diversity. Harvard Educational Review 39:301309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hunt, J. McV. (1969) Has compensatory education failed? Has it been attempted? Harvard Educational Review 39:278300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jablonka, E. & Lamb, M. J. (2002) The changing concept of epigenetics. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 981:8296.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jensen, A. (1969) How much can we boost IQ and scholastic achievement? Harvard Educational Review 39:1123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, W., Penke, L. & Spinath, F. M (2011) Heritability in the era of molecular genetics: Some thoughts for understanding genetic influences on behavioural traits. European Journal of Personality 25:254–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kagan, J. S. (1969) Inadequate evidence and illogical conclusions. Harvard Educational Review 39:274–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kovács, K. & Pléh, C. (2000) Evolution, individual differences and social commitments. PSYCOLOQUY 11:14. Available at: http://www.cogsci.ecs.soton.ac.uk/cgi/psyc/newpsy?11.045.Google Scholar
Luria, A. R. (1936) The development of mental functions in twins. Journal of Personality 5:3547. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.1936.tb02041.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McLafferty, C. L. Jr. (2006) Examining unproven assumptions of Galton's nature-nurture paradigm. American Psychologist 61(2):177–78.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Richardson, K. & Spears, D. (1972) Race, culture and intelligence. Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Taylor, H. F. (1980) The IQ game: A methodological inquiry into the heredity-environment controversy. Harvester.Google Scholar
Waddington, C. H. (1942) The epigenotype. Endeavour 1:1820.Google Scholar
Waddington, C. H. (1957) The strategy of the genes. Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Zazzo, R. (1955) Sur le postulat de la comparabilité dans la methode des jumeaux. Acta Geneticae Medicae et Gemollologiae 4:180–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zazzo, R. (1960) Les jumeaux. Le couple et la personne. Tome I. L'individuation somatique. T. 2. L'individuation psychologique. Presses Universataires de France.Google Scholar
Zazzo, R. (1962) Les jumeaux et la psychologie. Journal de Psychologie Normale et Pathologique 59:181–97.Google Scholar
Zhanks, T-Y. & Meaney, M. J. (2010) Epigenetic and the environmental regulation of the genome and its functions. Annual Review of Psychology 61:439–66.Google Scholar