No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Interrelationships of factors of social development are more complex than Life History Theory predicts
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 20 November 2019
Abstract
Life History Theory (LHT) predicts a monotonous relationship between affluence and the rate of innovations and strong correlations within a cluster of behavioral features. Although both predictions can be true in specific cases, they are incorrect in general. Therefore, the author's explanations may be right, but they do not prove LHT and cannot be generalized to other apparently similar processes.
- Type
- Open Peer Commentary
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2019
References
Adler, N. J. (1997) International dimensions of organizational behavior, 3rd edition. Southwestern.Google Scholar
Dakhli, M. & De Clercq, D. (2003) Human capital, social capital and innovation: A multi-country study. Working Paper, Univeristeit Gent. Available at: http://doi/10.1.1.197.4146.pdf.Google Scholar
Diener, E., Sadndvik, E., Seidlitz, L. & Diener, M. (1993) The relationship between income and subjective well-being: Relative or absolute? Social Indicators Research 28:195–223.Google Scholar
Furnham, A. & Rose, M. (1987) Alternative ethics: The relationship between the wealth, welfare, work, and leisure ethic. Human Relations 40(9):561–74.Google Scholar
Halpern, D. (2001) Moral values, social trust and equality. British Journal of Criminology 41:236–51.Google Scholar
Huang, W. S. W. (1995) A cross-national analysis on the effect of moral individualism on murder rates. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology 39:63–75.Google Scholar
Tang, L. & Koveos, P. E. (2004) Venture entrepreneurship, innovation entrepreneurship, and economic growth. Journal of Developmental Entrepreneurship 9:161–71.Google Scholar
Target article
Psychological origins of the Industrial Revolution
Related commentaries (24)
A claim for cognitive history
A needed amendment that explains too much and resolves little
Affluence boosted intelligence? How the interaction between cognition and environment may have produced an eighteenth-century Flynn effect during the Industrial Revolution
Are both necessity and opportunity the mothers of innovations?
Cultural interconnectedness and in-group cooperation as sources of innovation
Energy, transport, and consumption in the Industrial Revolution
England first, America second: The ecological predictors of life history and innovation
Environmental unpredictability, economic inequality, and dynamic nature of life history before, during, and after the Industrial Revolution
Explaining historical change in terms of LHT: A pluralistic causal framework is needed
Interrelationships of factors of social development are more complex than Life History Theory predicts
Life History Theory and economic modernity
Life History Theory and the Industrial Revolution
Many causes, not one
Psychological origins of the Industrial Revolution: Why we need causal methods and historians
Psychology and the economics of invention
Slowing life history (K) can account for increasing micro-innovation rates and GDP growth, but not macro-innovation rates, which declined following the end of the Industrial Revolution
The affective origins of the Industrial Revolution
The other angle of Maslow's pyramid: How scarce environments trigger low-opportunity-cost innovations
The wealth→life history→innovation account of the Industrial Revolution is largely inconsistent with empirical time series data
There is little evidence that the Industrial Revolution was caused by a preference shift
Timing is everything: Evaluating behavioural causal theories of Britain's industrialisation
Using big data to map the relationship between time perspectives and economic outputs
What came first, the chicken or the egg?
What motivated the Industrial Revolution: England's libertarian culture or affluence per se?
Author response
Psychological origins of the Industrial Revolution: More work is needed!