Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T14:16:34.241Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A needed amendment that explains too much and resolves little

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 November 2019

Slavisa Tasic
Affiliation:
The Institute of Economic Sciences, 12 Zmaj Jovina, 11000 Belgrade, Serbiaslavisa.tasic@ien.bg.ac.rshttps://sites.google.com/view/slavisatasic/home
Zeljka Buturovic
Affiliation:
Institute for Social Sciences, Belgrade 11000, Serbia. zbuturovic@idn.org.rshttp://www.idn.org.rs/istr_zeljka_buturovic_eng.php?nav=istr

Abstract

Baumard's application of Life History Theory to explain the origins of economic growth is a needed amendment to incentive-based explanations of modern economics. However, even though it is grounded in evolution, the theory does not do enough to specify the relevant evolutionary mechanisms. As such, it accommodates too many alternative historic scenarios, yet remains unable to explain divergent regional patterns of economic growth.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Clark, G. (2007) A farewell to alms: A brief economic history of the world. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
McCloskey, D. N. (2016a) Bourgeois equality: How ideas, not capital or institutions, enriched the world. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Mokyr, J. (2016) A culture of growth: The origins of the modern economy. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Taylor, D. R., Aarssen, L. W. & Loehle, C. (1990) On the relationship between r/K selection and environmental carrying capacity: A new habitat templet for plant life history strategies. Oikos 58(2):239–50.Google Scholar