Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T15:15:03.161Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The origins of music in (musi)language

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 September 2021

Evelina Leivada*
Affiliation:
Department of English and German Studies, Universitat Rovira i Virgili, 43002Tarragona, Spain. evelina.leivada@urv.cat, https://evelinaleivada.com/

Abstract

The view of music as a byproduct of other cognitive functions has been deemed incomplete or incorrect. Revisiting the six lines of evidence that support this conclusion, it is argued that it is unclear how the hypothesis that music has its origins in (musi)language is discarded. Two additional promising research lines that can support or discard the byproduct hypothesis are presented.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Arnold, K., & Zuberbühler, K. (2012). Call combinations in monkeys: Compositional or idiomatic expressions? Brain and Language, 120, 303309.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Atkinson, J. R. (2006). The perceptual characteristics of voice-hallucinations in deaf people: Insights into the nature of subvocal thought and sensory feedback loops. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 32(4), 701708.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brown, S. (2001). The “musilanguage” model of music evolution. In Wallin, N. L., Merker, B. & Brown, S. (Eds.), The origins of music (pp. 271300). MIT Press.Google Scholar
Chase, A. R. (2001). Music discriminations by carp (Cyprinus carpio). Animal Learning & Behavior, 29, 336353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
D'Souza, D., & Karmiloff-Smith, A. (2011). When modularization fails to occur: A developmental perspective. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 28, 276287.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Elie, J. E., & Theunissen, F. E. (2016). The vocal repertoire of the domesticated zebra finch: A data-driven approach to decipher the information-bearing acoustic features of communication signals. Animal Cognition, 19, 285315.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fisman, M. (1991). Musical hallucinations: Report of two unusual cases. The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 36(8), 609611.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gleitman, L. R., & Newport, E. L. (1995). The invention of language by children: Environmental and biological influences on the acquisition of language. In Gleitman, L. R. & Liberman, M. (Eds.), An invitation to cognitive science (pp. 124). The MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Honing, H., ten Cate, C., Peretz, I., & Trehub, S. E. (2015). Without it no music: Cognition, biology and evolution of musicality. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 370, 1664.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Liu, F., Jiang, C., Wang, B., Xu, Y., & Patel, A. D. (2015). A music perception disorder (congenital amusia) influences speech comprehension. Neuropsychologia, 66, 111118.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Minai, U., Gustafson, K., Fiorentino, R., Jongman, A., & Sereno, J. (2017). Fetal rhythm-based language discrimination: A biomagnetometry study. Neuroreport, 28(10), 561564.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pagel, M. (2017). Q&A: What is human language, when did it evolve and why should we care? BMC Biology, 15, 64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peretz, I., Vuvan, D., Lagrois, M.-E., & Armony, J. L. (2015). Neural overlap in processing music and speech. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 370, 1664.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Senghas, A., Kita, S., & Özyürek, A. (2004). Children creating core properties of language: Evidence from an emerging sign language in Nicaragua. Science (New York, N.Y.), 305, 17791782.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sihvonen, A. J., Ripolles, P., Leo, V., Rodriguez-Fornells, A., Soinila, S., & Sarkamo, T. (2016). Neural basis of acquired amusia and its recovery after stroke. Journal of Neuroscience, 36(34), 88728881.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed