Article contents
Prejudicial behavior: More closely linked to homophilic peer preferences than to trait bigotry
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 20 November 2012
Abstract
We disagree with Dixon et al. by maintaining that prejudice is primarily rooted in aversive reactions toward out-group members. However, these reactions are not indicative of negative attributes, such as trait bigotry, but rather normative homophily for peers with similar perceived attributes. Cognitive biases such as stereotype threat perpetuate perceptions of inequipotential and subsequent discrimination, irrespective of individuals' personality characteristics.
- Type
- Open Peer Commentary
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2012
References
Anderson, L. R., Mellor, J. M., & Milyo, J. (2008) Inequality and public good provision: An experimental analysis. The Journal of Social Economics
37:1010–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burgess, D. J.
Warren, J
Phelan, S., Davidio, J. & van Ryn, M. (2010) Stereotype threat and health disparities: What medical educators and future physicians need to know. Journal of General Internal Medicine
25(Suppl 2):169–77.Google Scholar
Cohen, G. L., Garcia, J., Apfel, N., & Master, A. (2006) Reducing the racial achievement gap: A social-psychological intervention. Science
313:1307–10.Google Scholar
Johns, M., Schmader, T. & Martens, A. (2005) Knowing is half the battle: Teaching stereotype threat as a means of improving women's math performance. Psychological Science
16:175–79.Google Scholar
Johnson, T., Dawes, C. T., Fowler, J. H., McElreath, R. & Smirnov, O. (2009) The role of egalitarian motives in altruistic punishment. Economics Letters
102:192–94.Google Scholar
Lecci, L. & Johnson, J. D. (2008) Black anti-White attitudes: The influence of racial identity and the Big Five. Personality and Individual Differences
44:182–92.Google Scholar
Martens, A., Johns, M., Greenberg, J. & Schimel, J. (2006) Combating stereotype threat: The effect of self-affirmation on women's intellectual performance. Journal of Experimental and Social Psychology
42:236–43.Google Scholar
McPherson, M., Smith-Lovin, L. & Cook, J. M. (2001) Birds of a feather: Homophily in social networks. Annual Review of Sociology
27:415–44.Google Scholar
Steele, C. M. & Aronson, J. (1995) Stereotype threat and the intellectual test performance of African Americans. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
69:797–811.Google Scholar
Vigil, J. M. (2007) Asymmetries in the social styles and friendship preferences of men and women. Human Nature
18:143–61.Google Scholar
Vigil, J. M. (2009) A socio-relational framework of sex differences in the expression of emotion. Behavioral and Brain Sciences
32:375–428.Google Scholar
- 2
- Cited by
Target article
Beyond prejudice: Are negative evaluations the problem and is getting us to like one another more the solution?
Related commentaries (27)
All about us, but never about us: The three-pronged potency of prejudice
Are attitudes the problem, and do psychologists have the answer? Relational cognition underlies intergroup relations
Beyond prejudice to prejudices
Echoing the call to move “beyond prejudice” in search of intergroup equality
Faustian bargains for minorities within group-based hierarchies
From extreme emotions to extreme actions: Explaining non-normative collective action and reconciliation
Heterosexism, homonegativity, and the sociopolitical dangers of orthodox models of prejudice reduction
History, prejudice, and the study of social inequities
Inequality is a relationship
Insights from studying prejudice in the context of American atheists
Liking more or hating less? A modest defence of intergroup contact theory
Of babies and bathwater, and rabbits and rabbit holes: A plea for conflict prevention, not conflict promotion
Prejudice and personality: A role for positive-approach processes?
Prejudice in context departs from attitudes toward groups
Prejudice is about politics: A collective action perspective
Prejudice reduction, collective action, and then what?
Prejudicial behavior: More closely linked to homophilic peer preferences than to trait bigotry
Statistical learning and prejudice
The dangers of prejudice reduction interventions: Empirical evidence from encounters between Jews and Arabs in Israel
The dominance of the individual in intergroup relations research: Understanding social change requires psychological theories of collective and structural phenomena
The politics of moving beyond prejudice
Traditional prejudice remains outside of the WEIRD world
Understanding the psychological processes involved in the demobilizing effects of positive cross-group contact
What works to address prejudice? Look to developmental science research for the answer
What's so crummy 'bout peace, love, and understanding?
What's so insidious about “Peace, Love, and Understanding”? A system justification perspective
You say you want a revolution?
Author response
Beyond prejudice: Relational inequality, collective action, and social change revisited