No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Liking more or hating less? A modest defence of intergroup contact theory
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 20 November 2012
Abstract
Here, I argue that Dixon et al. have overstated the prevalence of “benevolent” forms of prejudice; many stigmatised groups are currently the targets of overtly hostile evaluation and treatment by others (e.g., Muslims; immigrant groups). I also believe that the target article oversimplifies its presentation of prejudice researchers' primary theoretical and policy goals and that it overlooks important work in intergroup emotions.
- Type
- Open Peer Commentary
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2012
References
Brewer, M. B. & Miller, N. (1984) Beyond the contact hypothesis: Theoretical perspectives on desegregation. In: Groups in contact: The psychology of desegregation, ed. Miller, N. & Brewer, M. B., pp. 281–302, Academic Press.Google Scholar
Brown, R. & Hewstone, M. (2005) An integrative theory of intergroup contact. In: Advances in experimental social psychology, vol. 37, ed. Zanna, M. P., pp. 255–343. Elsevier Academic Press.Google Scholar
Brown, R., Gonzalez, R., Zagefka, H., Manzi, J. & Čehajić, S. (2008) Nuestra culpa: Collective guilt and shame as predictors of reparation for historical wrong-doing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
94:75–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chaplin, R., Flatley, J. & Smith, K. (2011) Crime in England and Wales: Findings from the British Crime Survey and police recorded crime, 2nd ed.
The Home Office.Google Scholar
Cottrell, C. A. & Neuberg, S. L. (2005) Different emotional reactions to different groups: A sociofunctional threat-based approach to “prejudice.”
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
88:770–89.Google Scholar
De, Tezanos
Pinto, P., Bratt, C. & Brown, R. (2010) What will the others think? Ingroup norms as a mediator of the effects of intergroup contact. British Journal of Social Psychology
49:507–23.Google Scholar
Gaertner, S. L. & Dovidio, J. F. (2000) Reducing intergroup bias: The common ingroup identity model. Psychology Press.Google Scholar
McLaren, L. (2003) Anti-immigrant prejudice in Europe: Contact, threat perception, and preferences for the exclusion of migrants. Social Forces
81:909–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pettigrew, T. F., Christ, O., Wagner, U. & Stellmacher, J. (2007) Direct and indirect intergroup contact effects on prejudice: A normative interpretation. International Journal of Intercultural Relations
31:411–25.Google Scholar
Pettigrew, T. F. & Tropp, L. (2006) A meta-analytic test of intergroup contact theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
90:751–83.Google Scholar
Pettigrew, T. F. & Tropp, L. R. (2011) When groups meet: The dynamics of intergroup contact. Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Pew Research Center (2008) The Pew Global Attitudes Report: Unfavorable attitudes of Jews and Muslims on the increase in Europe. Washington: Pew Research Center.Google Scholar
Rees, J., Allpress, J. A. & Brown, R. (in press) Nie wieder: Group-based emotions about wrongdoing to one outgroup affect attitudes toward an unrelated minority. Political Psychology.Google Scholar
Semyonov, M., Raijman, R. & Gorodzeisky, A. (2006) The rise of anti-immigrant sentiment in European societies, 1988–2000. American Sociological Review
71:426–49.Google Scholar
Smith, E. R. (1993) Social identity and social emotions: Toward new conceptualizations of prejudice. In: Affect, cognition and stereotyping, ed. Mackie, D. M. & Hamilton, D. L., pp. 297–315, Academic Press.Google Scholar
Wright, S. C., Aron, A., Mclaughlin-Volpe, T. & Ropp, S. A. (1997) The extended contact effect: Knowledge of cross-group friendships and prejudice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
73:73–90.Google Scholar
Target article
Beyond prejudice: Are negative evaluations the problem and is getting us to like one another more the solution?
Related commentaries (27)
All about us, but never about us: The three-pronged potency of prejudice
Are attitudes the problem, and do psychologists have the answer? Relational cognition underlies intergroup relations
Beyond prejudice to prejudices
Echoing the call to move “beyond prejudice” in search of intergroup equality
Faustian bargains for minorities within group-based hierarchies
From extreme emotions to extreme actions: Explaining non-normative collective action and reconciliation
Heterosexism, homonegativity, and the sociopolitical dangers of orthodox models of prejudice reduction
History, prejudice, and the study of social inequities
Inequality is a relationship
Insights from studying prejudice in the context of American atheists
Liking more or hating less? A modest defence of intergroup contact theory
Of babies and bathwater, and rabbits and rabbit holes: A plea for conflict prevention, not conflict promotion
Prejudice and personality: A role for positive-approach processes?
Prejudice in context departs from attitudes toward groups
Prejudice is about politics: A collective action perspective
Prejudice reduction, collective action, and then what?
Prejudicial behavior: More closely linked to homophilic peer preferences than to trait bigotry
Statistical learning and prejudice
The dangers of prejudice reduction interventions: Empirical evidence from encounters between Jews and Arabs in Israel
The dominance of the individual in intergroup relations research: Understanding social change requires psychological theories of collective and structural phenomena
The politics of moving beyond prejudice
Traditional prejudice remains outside of the WEIRD world
Understanding the psychological processes involved in the demobilizing effects of positive cross-group contact
What works to address prejudice? Look to developmental science research for the answer
What's so crummy 'bout peace, love, and understanding?
What's so insidious about “Peace, Love, and Understanding”? A system justification perspective
You say you want a revolution?
Author response
Beyond prejudice: Relational inequality, collective action, and social change revisited