Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T14:13:37.107Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Taking social psychology out of context

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 May 2022

Michael Brownstein Open the ORCID record for Michael Brownstein [Opens in a new window] ,
Daniel Kelly Open the ORCID record for Daniel Kelly [Opens in a new window]  and
Alex Madva Open the ORCID record for Alex Madva [Opens in a new window]
Michael Brownstein
Affiliation:
Department of Philosophy, John Jay College and the Graduate Center, CUNY, New York, NY, USA 10019. msbrownstein@gmail.com, www.michaelsbrownstein.com
Daniel Kelly
Affiliation:
Department of Philosophy, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, USA 47906-2098. drkelly@purdue.edu, http://web.ics.purdue.edu/~drkelly/
Alex Madva
Affiliation:
Department of Philosophy, California State Polytechnic University, Pomona, CA 91768, USA. alexmadva@gmail.com, https://www.alexmadva.com
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We endorse Cesario's call for more research into the complexities of “real-world” decisions and the comparative power of different causes of group disparities. Unfortunately, these reasonable suggestions are overshadowed by a barrage of non sequiturs, misdirected criticisms of methodology, and unsubstantiated claims about the assumptions and inferences of social psychologists.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 45 , 2022 , e71
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Brownstein, M., Madva, A., & Gawronski, B. (2020). Understanding implicit bias: Putting the criticism into perspective. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly, 101, 276–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cesario, J., Plaks, J. E., Hagiwara, N., Navarrete, C. D., & Higgins, E. T. (2010). The ecology of automaticity: How situational contingencies ahape action semantics and social behavior. Psychological Science, 21(9), 1311–1317. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797610378685.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dasgupta, N. (2013). Implicit attitudes and beliefs adapt to situations: A decade of research on the malleability of implicit prejudice, stereotypes, and the self-concept. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 47, 233–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davidson, L., & Kelly, D. (2020). Minding the gap: Bias, soft structures, and the double life of social norms. Journal of Applied Philosophy, Special Issue on Bias in Context, 37(2), 190–210. doi: 10.1111/japp.12351Google Scholar
Forscher, P. S., Lai, C. K., Axt, J. R., Ebersole, C. R., Herman, M., Devine, P. G., & Nosek, B. A. (2019). A meta-analysis of procedures to change implicit measures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 117(3), 522.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Glaser, J. (2014). Suspect race: Causes and consequences of racial profiling. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Madva, A. (2016a). A plea for anti-anti-individualism: How oversimple psychology misleads social policy. Ergo, an Open Access Journal of Philosophy, 3(27), 701–728. https://doi.org/10.3998/ergo.12405314.0003.027.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Madva, A. (2016b). Virtue, social knowledge, and implicit bias. In Brownstein, M. & Saul, J. (Eds.), Implicit bias and philosophy: Metaphysics and epistemology: Volume 1 (pp. 191–215). Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Madva, A. (2017). Biased against debiasing: On the role of (institutionally sponsored) self-transformation in the struggle against prejudice. Ergo, an Open Access Journal of Philosophy, 4(6), 145–179. http://dx.doi.org/10.3998/ergo.12405314.0004.006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Payne, B. K., Vuletich, H. A., & Lundberg, K. B. (2017). The bias of crowds: How implicit bias bridges personal and systemic prejudice. Psychological Inquiry, 28(4), 233–248. https://doi.org/10.1080/1047840X.2017.1335568.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sassenberg, K., & Ditrich, L. (2019). Research in social psychology changed between 2011 and 2016: Larger sample sizes, more self-report measures, and more online studies. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 2(2), 107–114. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245919838781.CrossRefGoogle Scholar