Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T15:24:48.513Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Developmental research assessing bias would benefit from naturalistic observation data

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 May 2022

Jennifer L. Rennels
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Nevada, Las Vegas, Las Vegas, NV 89154-5030, USA. Jennifer.rennels@unlv.edu; insouvan@unlv.nevada.edu https://rebellab.sites.unlv.edu
Kindy Insouvanh
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Nevada, Las Vegas, Las Vegas, NV 89154-5030, USA. Jennifer.rennels@unlv.edu; insouvan@unlv.nevada.edu https://rebellab.sites.unlv.edu

Abstract

Cesario's critiques and suggestions for redesigning social psychology experiments echo Dahl's (2017) call for developmental researchers to use experimental and naturalistic methods in a complementary manner for understanding children's development. We provide examples of how naturalistic observations can rectify Cesario's missing flaws for developmental studies investigating children's social biases and help researchers derive theories they can then experimentally test.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abrams, D., Rutland, A., Pelletier, J., & Ferrell, J. M. (2009). Children's group nous: Understanding and applying peer exclusion within and between groups. Child Development, 80(1), 224243. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2008.01256.x.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Braun, S. S., & Davidson, A. J. (2017). Gender (non) conformity in middle childhood: A mixed methods approach to understanding gender-typed behavior, friendship, and peer preference. Sex Roles, 77(1), 1629. https://doi:10.1007/s11199-016-0693-z.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dahl, A. (2017). Ecological commitments: Why developmental science needs naturalistic methods. Child Development Perspectives, 11(2), 7984. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdep.12217.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dunham, Y., & Degner, J. (2013). From categories to exemplars (and back again). In Banaji, M. R. & Gelman, S.A. (Eds.), Navigating the social world: What infants, children, and other species can teach us (pp. 275280). Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fitzroy, S., & Rutland, A. (2010). How social experience is related to children's intergroup attitudes. European Journal of Social Psychology, 40(4), 679693. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Katz, P. A., & Walsh, P. V. (1991). Modification of children's gender-stereotyped behavior. Child Development, 62(2), 338351. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.1991.tb01535.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, C. L., Kornienko, O., Schaefer, D. R., Hanish, L. D., Fabes, R. A., & Goble, P. (2013). The role of sex of peers and gender-typed activities in young children's peer affiliative networks: A longitudinal analysis of selection and influence. Child Development, 84(3), 921937. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12032.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McGlothlin, H., & Killen, M. (2010). How social experience is related to children's intergroup attitudes. European Journal of Social Psychology, 40(4), 625634. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rennels, J. L., & Langlois, J. H. (2014). Children's attractiveness, gender, and race biases: A comparison of their strength and generality. Child Development, 85(4), 14011418. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12226.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rutland, A., Cameron, L., Milne, A., & McGeorge, P. (2005). Social norms and self-presentation: Children's implicit and explicit intergroup attitudes. Child Development, 76(2), 451466. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2005.00856.x.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed