Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T20:16:59.807Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

You say you want a revolution?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 November 2012

Mark Alicke*
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Ohio University, Athens, OH 45701. alicke@ohio.edu

Abstract

I argue that Dixon et al. fail to maintain a careful distinction between the negative evaluation definition of “prejudice” and the implications of this definition for correcting the social ills that prejudice engenders. I also argue that they adduce little evidence to suggest that if prejudice were diminished, commensurate reductions in discrimination would not follow.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2012 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Eagly, A. H. & Wood, W. (1991) Explaining sex differences in social behavior: A meta-analytic perspective. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 17: 306–15.Google Scholar
Fiske, S. T. (1993) Controlling other people: The impact of power on stereotyping. American Psychologist 48:621–28.Google Scholar
Hamilton, D. L. (1981) Illusory correlation as a basis for stereotyping. In: Cognitive processes in stereotyping and intergroup behavior, ed. Hamilton, D. L., pp. 563–71. Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Hovland, C. I. & Sears, R. (1940) Minor studies of aggression: Correlation of lynchings with economic indices. Journal of Psychology 9:301–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, J. W. (1993) Realistic group conflict theory: A review and evaluation of the theoretical and empirical literature. Psychological Record 43:395413.Google Scholar
Lerner, M. J. (1980) The belief in a just world. Plenum.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McPherson, J. M. (2003) Battle cry of freedom: The Civil War era. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mullen, B., Brown, R. & Smith, C. (1992) Ingroup bias as a function of salience, relevance, and status: An integration. European Journal of Social Psychology 22:103–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quattrone, G. A. & Jones, E. E. (1980) The perception of variability within ingroups and outgroups: Implications for the law of small numbers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 38:141–52.Google Scholar