Open Peer Commentary
Strategies for the control of studies of voluntary movements with one mechanical degree of freedom
-
- Published online by Cambridge University Press:
- 04 February 2010, p. 227
-
- Article
- Export citation
Braking may be more critical than acceleration
-
- Published online by Cambridge University Press:
- 04 February 2010, pp. 227-228
-
- Article
- Export citation
EMG bursts, sampling, and strategy in movement control
-
- Published online by Cambridge University Press:
- 04 February 2010, pp. 228-229
-
- Article
- Export citation
On simple movements and complex theories (and vice versa)
-
- Published online by Cambridge University Press:
- 04 February 2010, pp. 229-230
-
- Article
- Export citation
At least two strategies
-
- Published online by Cambridge University Press:
- 04 February 2010, pp. 230-231
-
- Article
- Export citation
Time optimality, proprioception, and the triphasic EMG pattern
-
- Published online by Cambridge University Press:
- 04 February 2010, pp. 231-232
-
- Article
- Export citation
Is handwriting a mixed strategy or a mixture of strategies?
-
- Published online by Cambridge University Press:
- 04 February 2010, pp. 232-233
-
- Article
- Export citation
Initiating voluntary movements: Wrong theories for the wrong behaviour?
-
- Published online by Cambridge University Press:
- 04 February 2010, pp. 233-234
-
- Article
- Export citation
Elementary conditions for elemental movement strategies
-
- Published online by Cambridge University Press:
- 04 February 2010, pp. 234-235
-
- Article
- Export citation
Why are “strategies’ senstitive? Smoothing the way for raison d'àtre
-
- Published online by Cambridge University Press:
- 04 February 2010, pp. 235-236
-
- Article
- Export citation
What is adapted in strategy-governed movements?
-
- Published online by Cambridge University Press:
- 04 February 2010, pp. 236-237
-
- Article
- Export citation
Author's Response
Does constraining movements constrain the developement of movement theories?
-
- Published online by Cambridge University Press:
- 04 February 2010, pp. 237-250
-
- Article
- Export citation
Target Articles
Reconciling Fechner and Stevens: Toward a unified psychophysical law
-
- Published online by Cambridge University Press:
- 04 February 2010, pp. 251-267
-
- Article
- Export citation
Open Peer Commentary
Is a unified psychophysical law realistic?
-
- Published online by Cambridge University Press:
- 04 February 2010, pp. 267-268
-
- Article
- Export citation
Integration psychophysics
-
- Published online by Cambridge University Press:
- 04 February 2010, pp. 268-269
-
- Article
- Export citation
The fickle measuring instrument
-
- Published online by Cambridge University Press:
- 04 February 2010, pp. 269-270
-
- Article
- Export citation
To resolve Fechner versus Stevens: Settle the dispute concerning “ratios” and “differences”
-
- Published online by Cambridge University Press:
- 04 February 2010, pp. 270-271
-
- Article
- Export citation
About assumptions and exponents
-
- Published online by Cambridge University Press:
- 04 February 2010, p. 271
-
- Article
- Export citation
Unifying psychophysics: And what if things are not so simple?
-
- Published online by Cambridge University Press:
- 04 February 2010, pp. 271-273
-
- Article
- Export citation
Jnds and ROCs
-
- Published online by Cambridge University Press:
- 04 February 2010, pp. 273-274
-
- Article
- Export citation