Open Peer Commentary
Back to basics
-
- Published online by Cambridge University Press:
- 04 February 2010, p. 706
-
- Article
- Export citation
Dual versus single routes: What we need to know before constructing a model
-
- Published online by Cambridge University Press:
- 04 February 2010, pp. 706-707
-
- Article
- Export citation
The psychology of the four-letter word, plus or minus: Humphreys & Evett's evaluation of the dual-route theory of reading
-
- Published online by Cambridge University Press:
- 04 February 2010, pp. 707-708
-
- Article
- Export citation
The phonological route to the mental lexicon: Some unconsidered evidence
-
- Published online by Cambridge University Press:
- 04 February 2010, pp. 708-709
-
- Article
- Export citation
In defence of dual-route models of reading
-
- Published online by Cambridge University Press:
- 04 February 2010, pp. 709-710
-
- Article
- Export citation
Specifying the loci of context effects in reading
-
- Published online by Cambridge University Press:
- 04 February 2010, pp. 710-711
-
- Article
- Export citation
The mechanisms of naming
-
- Published online by Cambridge University Press:
- 04 February 2010, pp. 711-712
-
- Article
- Export citation
Further complications for dual-route theory
-
- Published online by Cambridge University Press:
- 04 February 2010, pp. 712-713
-
- Article
- Export citation
Oral reading: Duel but not rout
-
- Published online by Cambridge University Press:
- 04 February 2010, pp. 713-714
-
- Article
- Export citation
Phonological effects in the visual processing of words: Some methodological considerations
-
- Published online by Cambridge University Press:
- 04 February 2010, pp. 714-715
-
- Article
- Export citation
Perceptual units in word recognition
-
- Published online by Cambridge University Press:
- 04 February 2010, p. 715
-
- Article
- Export citation
Size and salience of spelling-sound correspondences
-
- Published online by Cambridge University Press:
- 04 February 2010, pp. 715-716
-
- Article
- Export citation
Do we look for independence or near decomposability?
-
- Published online by Cambridge University Press:
- 04 February 2010, pp. 716-717
-
- Article
- Export citation
Access to the lexicon: Are there three routes?
-
- Published online by Cambridge University Press:
- 04 February 2010, pp. 717-718
-
- Article
- Export citation
Criticising dual-route theory: Missing the point
-
- Published online by Cambridge University Press:
- 04 February 2010, p. 718
-
- Article
- Export citation
So the “strong” theory loses. But are there any winners?
-
- Published online by Cambridge University Press:
- 04 February 2010, pp. 718-719
-
- Article
- Export citation
Segmentation in models of reading
-
- Published online by Cambridge University Press:
- 04 February 2010, pp. 719-720
-
- Article
- Export citation
Dual-route theory and the consistency effect
-
- Published online by Cambridge University Press:
- 04 February 2010, pp. 720-721
-
- Article
- Export citation
The pitfalls of selective attention
-
- Published online by Cambridge University Press:
- 04 February 2010, p. 721
-
- Article
- Export citation
Some reasons to save the grapheme and the phoneme
-
- Published online by Cambridge University Press:
- 04 February 2010, pp. 721-722
-
- Article
- Export citation