Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
  1. Home
  2. Journals
  3. The Cambridge Law Journal
  4. Volume 83
Journal Home
Refine listing

Refine listing

Access:
Publication date:

Actions for selected content:

Select all | Deselect all
  • View selected items
  • Export citations
  • Download PDF (zip)
  • Save to Kindle
  • Save to Dropbox
  • Save to Google Drive

Save Search

You can save your searches here and later view and run them again in "My saved searches".

Please provide a title, maximum of 40 characters.
Cancel
×
< Back to all issues

Volume 83 - July 2024

Contents

Page 1 of 3

Case and Comment

  • RUSSIAN THREATS OF FORCE AGAINST UKRAINE MAY CONSTITUTE DURESS IN ENGLISH CONTRACT LAW

  • Andrew Sanger, Janet O’Sullivan
  • Published online by Cambridge University Press:
    03 April 2024, pp. 1-5
    • Article
      • You have access
      • Open access
    • PDF
    • HTML
    • Export citation

  • GENOCIDE CASES BEFORE THE INTERNATIONAL COURT: COMMUNITY ACTION TO ENFORCE FUNDAMENTAL NORMS

  • Andrew Sanger
  • Published online by Cambridge University Press:
    24 October 2024, pp. 199-205
    • Article
      • You have access
      • Open access
    • PDF
    • HTML
    • Export citation

  • CART REVISITED: OUSTER CLAUSES AND THE UPPER TRIBUNAL

  • Philip Murray
  • Published online by Cambridge University Press:
    03 April 2024, pp. 6-9
    • Article
      • You have access
    • PDF
    • HTML
    • Export citation

  • THE MEANING OF “SAFE” AND THE UK AND RWANDA ASYLUM PARTNERSHIP ARRANGEMENT

  • Kirsty Hughes
  • Published online by Cambridge University Press:
    24 October 2024, pp. 206-209
    • Article
      • You have access
    • PDF
    • HTML
    • Export citation

  • HOMICIDE: LOSING CONTROL

  • James Manwaring
  • Published online by Cambridge University Press:
    24 October 2024, pp. 210-213
    • Article
      • You have access
      • Open access
    • PDF
    • HTML
    • Export citation

  • REMEDIAL DISCRETION IN JUDICIAL REVIEW: LOOKING FORWARD

  • Joanna Bell
  • Published online by Cambridge University Press:
    03 April 2024, pp. 10-13
    • Article
      • You have access
      • Open access
    • PDF
    • HTML
    • Export citation

  • PRINCIPLES, ACCIDENTS AND EXCEPTIONS: PSYCHIATRIC INJURY IN TORT

  • Jonathan Morgan
  • Published online by Cambridge University Press:
    24 October 2024, pp. 214-217
    • Article
      • You have access
    • PDF
    • HTML
    • Export citation

  • LOSING (AND RESTORING) THE BIG PICTURE: ASSISTED CONCEPTION AND LEGAL PARENTHOOD

  • Stephen Gilmore
  • Published online by Cambridge University Press:
    03 April 2024, pp. 14-16
    • Article
      • You have access
      • Open access
    • PDF
    • HTML
    • Export citation

  • NEGLIGENT DAMAGE TO BAILED PROPERTY AND FORESEEABLE FINANCIAL LOSS

  • Janet O’Sullivan
  • Published online by Cambridge University Press:
    24 October 2024, pp. 218-221
    • Article
      • You have access
      • Open access
    • PDF
    • HTML
    • Export citation

  • SKAT WARS EPISODE I: THE RULE AGAINST ENFORCING FOREIGN PUBLIC LAWS

  • Teen Jui Chow, Michael Nguyen-Kim
  • Published online by Cambridge University Press:
    03 April 2024, pp. 17-20
    • Article
      • You have access
    • PDF
    • HTML
    • Export citation

  • STACK v DOWDEN REVISITED: CO-OWNERSHIP, SURVIVORSHIP AND PRESUMPTIONS

  • Amy Goymour
  • Published online by Cambridge University Press:
    24 October 2024, pp. 222-225
    • Article
      • You have access
      • Open access
    • PDF
    • HTML
    • Export citation

  • REMEDIES FOR DISHONEST ASSISTANCE: HEARTBREAK HOTEL

  • James McComish
  • Published online by Cambridge University Press:
    03 April 2024, pp. 21-26
    • Article
      • You have access
    • PDF
    • HTML
    • Export citation

  • TOMORROW YOU SHALL CEASE TO BE A MARIONETTE, AND YOU SHALL BECOME AN INVENTOR

  • Joshua Jowitt
  • Published online by Cambridge University Press:
    24 October 2024, pp. 226-229
    • Article
      • You have access
      • Open access
    • PDF
    • HTML
    • Export citation

  • ALL OR NOTHING

  • Rory Gregson
  • Published online by Cambridge University Press:
    03 April 2024, pp. 27-29
    • Article
      • You have access
    • PDF
    • HTML
    • Export citation

  • REVOCATION OF PARENTAL RESPONSIBILITY AND MARITAL STATUS: LEGITIMATE DISCRIMINATION?

  • Stephen Gilmore
  • Published online by Cambridge University Press:
    24 October 2024, pp. 230-233
    • Article
      • You have access
    • PDF
    • HTML
    • Export citation

  • THE PURSUIT OF CORPORATE ACCOUNTABILITY: CLIMATE CHANGE LITIGATION AND THE USE OF SHAREHOLDER DERIVATIVE ACTIONS

  • Adefolake Adeyeye
  • Published online by Cambridge University Press:
    03 April 2024, pp. 30-32
    • Article
      • You have access
      • Open access
    • PDF
    • HTML
    • Export citation

  • APPLICABLE LAW IN TORTIOUS CLAIMS

  • Pippa Rogerson
  • Published online by Cambridge University Press:
    24 October 2024, pp. 234-237
    • Article
      • You have access
      • Open access
    • PDF
    • HTML
    • Export citation

  • LIABILITY FOR FALSE IMPRISONMENT AND JUDICIAL IMMUNITY IN AUSTRALIA’S FEDERAL COURT SYSTEM

  • Simon Allison, John Minas
  • Published online by Cambridge University Press:
    03 April 2024, pp. 33-35
    • Article
      • You have access
      • Open access
    • PDF
    • HTML
    • Export citation

Articles

  • ENSURING CONSUMERS “GET WHAT THEY WANT”: THE ROLE OF TRADEMARK LAW

  • Graeme B. Dinwoodie
  • Published online by Cambridge University Press:
    06 February 2024, pp. 36-61
    • Article
      • You have access
    • PDF
    • HTML
    • Export citation

  • This Article considers how trademark law should interpret the commitment in legislative history to the 1946 (US) Lanham Act that one of the principal purposes of trademark law is “to protect the public so that it may be confident that, in purchasing a product bearing a particular trademark which it favorably knows, it will get the product which it asks for and which it wants to get”. It looks back to highlight the often under-appreciated role of the consumer protection rationale in recent expansions in trademark protection, and then considers the different ways by which that basic objective might now be pursued by trademark law. It concludes that, without disregarding the core consumer protection purpose of trademark law, we need to start viewing the question of ensuring consumers get what they want both with a broader view of consumer interests and more explicit attention to a wider array of values.

Case and Comment

  • THE CONTINUING INTEREST OF KNOWING RECEIPT

  • Lionel Smith
  • Published online by Cambridge University Press:
    24 October 2024, pp. 238-243
    • Article
      • You have access
    • PDF
    • HTML
    • Export citation

Page 1 of 3