This note adds to the recent research project on treatment choice
under ambiguity. I generalize the Manski (Journal of
Econometrics, in press) analysis of minimax
regret treatment choice by considering a more general setting and, more
importantly, by solving for the treatment rule given finitely many (as
opposed to two) treatments. The most interesting finding is that with
three or more undominated treatments, the minimax regret treatment rule
may assign the same treatment to all subjects; thus, the most salient
feature of the two-treatment case does not generalize.I thank Chuck Manski, the co-editor, and especially an
anonymous referee for helpful comments. Financial support through the
Robert Eisner Memorial Fellowship, Department of Economics, Northwestern
University, in addition to a Dissertation Year Fellowship, The Graduate
School, Northwestern University, is gratefully acknowledged.