Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-15T03:46:19.394Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Irrational Diversification: An Examination of Individual Portfolio Choice

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 June 2011

Guido Baltussen  and
Gerrit T. Post
Guido Baltussen
Affiliation:
Erasmus School of Economics, Burgemeester Oudlaan 50, Rotterdam 3000 DR, The Netherlands, and New York University, guidobaltussen@gmail.com
Gerrit T. Post
Affiliation:
Graduate School of Business, Koç University, Rumelifeneri Yolu, Istanbul 34450, Turkey, thierrypost@hotmail.com
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We study individual portfolio choice in a laboratory experiment and find strong evidence for heuristic behavior. The subjects tend to focus on the marginal distribution of an asset, while largely ignoring its diversification benefits. They follow a conditional 1/n diversification heuristic as they exclude the assets with an “unattractive” marginal distribution and divide the available funds equally between the remaining “attractive” assets. This strategy is applied even if it leads to allocations that are dominated in terms of first-order stochastic dominance and is clearly irrational. In line with these findings, we find that framing and problem presentation have substantial influence on portfolio decisions.

Type
Research Articles
Information
Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis , Volume 46 , Issue 5 , October 2011 , pp. 1463 - 1491
Copyright
Copyright © Michael G. Foster School of Business, University of Washington 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ackert, L. F.; Charupat, N.; Deaves, R.; and Kluger, B. D.. “Probability Judgment Error and Speculation in Laboratory Asset Market Bubbles.” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 44 (2009), 719–744.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baltussen, G.; Post, T.; Van den Assem, M. J.; and Wakker, P. P.. “Random Incentive Systems in a Dynamic Choice Experiment.” Working Paper (2009), available at SSRN (http://ssrn.com/abstract=1118001).Google Scholar
Barberis, N., and Huang, M.. “Mental Accounting, Loss Aversion, and Individual Stock Returns.” Journal of Finance, 56 (2001), 1247–1292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barberis, N.; Huang, M.; and Thaler, R. H.. “Individual Preferences, Monetary Gambles, and Stock Market Participation: A Case for Narrow Framing.” American Economic Review, 96 (2006), 1069–1090.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benartzi, S.; Peleg, E.; and Thaler, R. H.. “Choice Architecture and Retirement Saving Plans.” Working Paper (2007), available at SSRN (http://ssrn.com/abstract=999420).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benartzi, S., and Thaler, R. H.. “Naïve Diversification Strategies in Defined Contribution Saving Plans.” American Economic Review, 91 (2001), 79–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benartzi, S., and Thaler, R. H.. “How Much Is Investor Autonomy Worth?” Journal of Finance, 57 (2002), 1593–1616.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blume, M. E., and Friend, I.. “The Asset Structure of Individual Portfolios and Some Implications for Utility Functions.” Journal of Finance, 30 (1975), 585–603.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Charness, G.; Karni, E.; and Levin, D.. “Individual and Group Decision Making under Risk: An Experimental Study of Bayesian Updating and Violations of First-Order Stochastic Dominance.” Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 35 (2007), 129–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cubitt, R. P.; Starmer, C.; and Sugden, R.. “On the Validity of the Random Lottery Incentive System.” Experimental Economics, 1 (1998), 115–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Bondt, W. F. M., and Thaler, R. H.. “Does the Stock Market Overreact?” Journal of Finance, 40 (1985), 793–805.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Bondt, W. F. M., and Thaler, R. H.. “Further Evidence on Investor Overreaction and Stock Market Seasonality.” Journal of Finance, 42 (1987), 557–581.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dorn, D., and Huberman, G.. “Preferred Risk Habitat of Individual Investors.” Journal of Financial Economics, 97 (2010), 155–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fama, E. F., and French, K. R.. “Dividend Yields and Expected Stock Returns.” Journal of Financial Economics, 22 (1988), 3–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fama, E. F., and French, K. R.. “The Cross-Section of Expected Stock Returns.” Journal of Finance, 47 (1992), 427–465.Google Scholar
Fama, E. F., and French, K. R.. “Common Risk Factors in the Returns on Stocks and Bonds.” Journal of Financial Economics, 33 (1993), 3–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fox, C. R., and Clemen, R. T.. “Subjective Probability Assessment in Decision Analysis: Partition Dependence and Bias toward the Ignorance Prior.” Management Science, 51 (2005), 1417–1432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fox, C. R.; Ratner, R. K.; and Lieb, D. S.. “How Subjective Grouping of Options Influences Choice and Allocation: Diversification Bias and the Phenomenon of Partition Dependence.” Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 134 (2005), 538–551.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goetzmann, W. N., and Kumar, A.. “Why Do Individual Investors Hold Under-Diversified Portfolios?” Working Paper, Yale University (2005).Google Scholar
Gul, F. “A Theory of Disappointment Aversion.” Econometrica, 59 (1991), 667–686.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hotelling, H. “Multivariate Quality Control.” In Techniques of Statistical Analysis, Eisenhart, C., Hastay, M. W., and Wallis, W. A., eds. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill (1947).Google Scholar
Huberman, G., and Jiang, W.. “Offering versus Choice in 401(k) Plans: Equity Exposure and Number of Funds.” Journal of Finance, 61 (2006), 763–801.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kopa, M., and Post, T.. “A Portfolio Optimality Test Based on the First-Order Stochastic Dominance Criterion.” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 44 (2009), 1103–1124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kroll, Y., and Levy, H.. “Further Tests of the Separation Theorem and the Capital Asset Pricing Model.” American Economic Review, 82 (1992), 664–670Google Scholar
Kroll, Y.; Levy, H.; and Rapoport, A.. “Experimental Tests of the Separation Theorem and the Capital Asset Pricing Model.” American Economic Review, 78 (1988), 500–519.Google Scholar
Kumar, A., and Lim, S. S.. “How Do Decision Frames Influence the Stock Investment Choices of Individual Investors?” Management Science, 54 (2008), 1052–1064.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuosmanen, T. “Efficient Diversification According to Stochastic Dominance Criteria.” Management Science, 50 (2004), 1390–1406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Langer, T., and Fox, C. R.. “Naïve Diversification in Allocation among Risky Prospects: Partition-Dependence, Unit-Dependence, and Procedure-Dependence.” Working Paper, University of California at Los Angeles (2004).Google Scholar
Levy, H.; Levy, M.; and Alisof, N.. “Homemade Leverage: Theory versus Experimental Evidence.” Journal of Portfolio Management, 31 (2004), 84–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Markowitz, H. M. “Portfolio Selection.” Journal of Finance, 7 (1952), 77–91.Google Scholar
Markowitz, H. M. Portfolio Selection: Efficient Diversification of Investments. New York, NY: John Wiley and Sons Inc. (1959).Google Scholar
Mehra, R., and Prescott, E. C.. “The Equity Premium: A Puzzle.” Journal of Monetary Economics, 15 (1985), 145–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Payne, J. W. “Task Complexity and Contingent Processing in Decision Making: An Informational Search and Protocol Analysis.” Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 16 (1976), 366–387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Payne, J. W.; Bettman, J. R.; and Johnson, E. J.. “Behavioral Decision Research: A Constructive Processing Perspective.” Annual Review of Psychology, 43 (1992), 87–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Payne, J. W.; Bettman, J. R.; and Johnson, E. J.. The Adaptive Decision Maker. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press (1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Polkovnichenko, V. “Household Portfolio Diversification: A Case for Rank-Dependent Preferences.” Review of Financial Studies, 18 (2005), 1467–1502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Post, T. “Empirical Tests for Stochastic Dominance Efficiency.” Journal of Finance, 58 (2003), 1905–1931.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Read, D., and Loewenstein, G.. “Diversification Bias: Explaining the Discrepancy in Variety Seeking between Combined and Separated Choices.” Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 1 (1995), 34–49.Google Scholar
Read, D.; Loewenstein, G.; and Rabin, M.. “Choice Bracketing.” Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 19 (1999), 171–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rubinstein, A. “Irrational Diversification in Multiple Decision Problems.” European Economic Review, 46 (2002), 1369–1378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shefrin, H., and Statman, M.. “Behavioral Portfolio Theory.” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 35 (2000), 127–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shiller, R. J. “Do Stock Prices Move Too Much to Be Justified by Subsequent Changes in Dividends?” American Economic Review, 71 (1981), 421–436.Google Scholar
Simon, H. A. “A Behavioral Model of Rational Choice.” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 69 (1955), 99–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simon, H. A. “Rational Decision Making in Business Organizations.” American Economic Review, 69 (1979), 493–513.Google Scholar
Simonson, I. “Choice Based on Reasons: The Case of Attraction and Compromise Effects.” Journal of Consumer Research, 16 (1989), 158–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simonson, I. “The Effect of Purchase Quantity and Timing on Variety-Seeking Behavior.” Journal of Marketing Research, 27 (1990), 150–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simonson, I., and Tversky, A.. “Choice in Context: Tradeoff Contrast and Extremeness Aversion.” Journal of Marketing Research, 29 (1992), 281–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slovic, P. “The Construction of Preference.” American Psychologist, 50 (1995), 364–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sonnemann, U.; Camerer, C.; Fox, C. R.; and Langer, T.. “Partition-Dependent Framing Effects in Lab and Field Prediction Markets.” Working Paper (2008), available at SSRN (http://ssrn.com/abstract=1099073).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Starmer, C., and Sugden, R.. “Does the Random-Lottery Incentive System Elicit True Preferences? An Experimental Investigation.” American Economic Review, 81 (1991), 971–978.Google Scholar
Thaler, R. H. “Mental Accounting and Consumer Choice.” Marketing Science, 4 (1985), 199–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thaler, R. H. “Mental Accounting Matters.” Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 12 (1999), 183–2063.0.CO;2-F>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thaler, R. H., and Johnson, E. J.. “Gambling with the House Money and Trying to Break Even: The Effects of Prior Outcomes on Risky Choice.” Management Science, 36 (1990), 643–660.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tversky, A. “Elimination by Aspects: A Theory of Choice.” Psychological Review, 79 (1972), 281–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tversky, A., and Kahneman, D.. “The Framing of Decisions and the Psychology of Choice.” Science, 211 (1981), 453–458.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tversky, A., and Kahneman, D.. “Rational Choice and the Framing of Decisions.” Journal of Business, 59 (1986), S251–S278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tversky, A., and Kahneman, D.. “Advances in Prospect Theory: Cumulative Representation of Uncertainty.” Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 5 (1992), 297–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wooldridge, J. M. “Cluster-Sample Methods in Applied Econometrics.” American Economic Review, 93 (2003), 133–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar