Attentional–inhibitory control and social–behavioral
regulation are two outcome domains commonly impaired after
childhood closed head injury (CHI). We compared neuropsychological
tests of attentional–inhibitory control (vigilance, selective
attention, response modulation) and social discourse and
intentionality (inferencing, figurative language, and speech
acts) with parent ratings of attention and behavioral regulation
in relation to four injury- related variables: age at CHI, time
since CHI, CHI injury severity, and frontal lobe injury moderated
by CHI severity. Participants were 105 school-aged children
in the chronic stage of CHI, divided into mild, moderate, and
severe injury severity groups, and further subdivided according
to frontal lobe injury. Outcome indices were imperfectly correlated
in the group as a whole, although several relations between
neurocognitive tests and parent ratings were observed within
CHI subgroups. Different domains of cognitive function had
different predictors. For attentional–inhibitory control,
age at injury and time since injury were most predictive of
outcome; for social discourse, predictors were injury severity
and frontal lobe injury moderated by injury severity. Variability
in cognitive outcome after childhood CHI is not random, but
appears related to age, time, and biological features of the
injury. (JINS, 2001, 7, 683–692.)