Both electroacoustic music and its associated musicology are a half century
old. Although the number of relevant technological developments during this
time could be said to be extremely high, its music has known relatively
few heroes, at least within contemporary art music, and written scholarship
demonstrates a bias towards formalism and therefore much less of one
towards the contextual, aesthetic, reception, etc. The previous sentence
implies an imbalance worthy of addressing. This article is less a survey of
what exists in the area of electroacoustic music scholarship than one
looking into delineating the area and suggesting where the ‘holes in the
market’ might be and how they might be filled. Are the fields of sonic art
and its musicology intentionally avoiding coherence? And why do
musicologists of the music of notes continue to avoid the musicology of the
music of sounds? Finally, triangulation, i.e. the use of feedback and
evaluation so rarely applied in electroacoustic music(ologogical)
contexts, is promoted as a means to greater cohesion and understanding,
avoiding what is called an ‘island mentality’ demonstrated by
many individuals working in all areas of the sonic arts.