Cyclones are expected to increase in frequency and intensity, significantly impacting communities and healthcare services. During these times, those with chronic diseases such as opioid dependence are at an increased risk of disease exacerbation due to treatment regimen interruptions. Disruptions to the continuity of the opioid replacement therapy (ORT) service can be detrimental to both clients and the community which can potentially lead to relapse, withdrawal, and risky behaviors.

To explore the impacts of cyclones on opioid treatment programs within community and hospital pharmacies in Queensland.

Qualitative research methods were used in this study with two methods of data analysis employed: the text analytics software, Leximancer®, and manual coding. Interviews were conducted with five hospital and five community pharmacists and four Queensland opioid treatment program (QOTP) employees. Participants worked in Mackay, Rockhampton, Townsville, and Yeppoon in a community impacted by a cyclone and involved with ORT supply.

The themes developed in the manual coding were “impact on essential services,” “human experience,” “healthcare infrastructure,” “preparedness,” and “interprofessional networks.” These themes were aligned with those identified in the Leximancer® analysis. The community pharmacists focused on client stability, whereas, the hospital pharmacists and QOTP employees focused on the need for disaster plans to be implemented.

The greatest concern for participants was maintaining the stability of their clients. Communication amongst the dosing sites and ORT stakeholders was most concerning. This led to a lack of dosing information in a timely manner with pharmacists being hesitant to provide doses and takeaways due to legislative restrictions. A review of coordinated efforts and the legislative constraints is recommended to ensure continuity of ORT supply during cyclones.

The opioid epidemic is overwhelming communities across the United States. West Virginia (WV) has been devastated, heralding a 86% increase in deaths from 2012-2016, and over 1,000 deaths last year as per WV Health Statistics Center. Treatment centers and providers have emerged throughout the state to provide medication-assisted treatment (MAT). The impact of these clinics on the opioid abusing population is not yet fully understood.

Utilizing Geographic Information System (GIS), a comparison of MAT provider locations versus regions of historical overdoses can indicate areas of deficiency. If no providers emerge in underserved counties, overdose deaths in those areas will continue to rise.

Maps were created using current DEA-X licenses in WV registered through Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAHMSA). Overdose death rates were taken from WV Public Health Records from 2010-2017. Two maps and corresponding data were compared for overlap or lack thereof.

Of the 338 locations of DEA-X licenses registered, 17.5% are in Cabell County, which led the state in overdose deaths in 2017. Only 2.5% of the total providers are currently in Wayne County, which had the second highest overdose death rate. Berkeley County, which was 3rd highest, has a mere 6.5% of total providers. Comparatively, Kanawah County, home to the state’s capital, has over twice this number of providers despite consistently having at or below the state average of overdose rates. Resources are pulled towards population-dense areas or university centers, where the epidemic is present but misses counties with higher overdose rates.

Results show a lack of MAT providers in many of WV’s devastated counties. Treatment centers exist throughout the state but are concentrated in regions with large cities or academic centers. This distribution limits accessibility to a marginalized patient population, making improvements unlikely in WV’s future opioid-overdose death rates.

Healthcare professionals working in a disaster face destroyed physical infrastructures, scarce supplies, and a limited-in-training peer group. During a mass casualty event, disaster victims are triaged to the “expectant” category of care because either their injuries are not survivable or the resources needed to care for them are not available.

To examine the challenges that disaster responders face in caring for dying patients in the field, and advocate for basic palliative care training prior to deploying to a disaster.

The world’s literature was reviewed to identify challenges for disaster teams in providing compassionate end-of-life care and to find training exercises for pre-deployment competency building.

Training Topics in Palliative Care Prior to Disaster Deployment include the following:

1. 1. Symptom Management Protocols:

   • Pain

   • Anxiety

   • Respiratory distress

   • Delirium

   • Nausea and Vomiting

2. 2. Spiritual Management

   • Grief

   • Identify meaning

3. 3. Cultural Training specific to the location of the disaster

   • The meaning of death in the culture

   • Who are the decision makers in the family

4. 4. Training for difficult conversations

   • Delivering Bad News

   • Managing a grieving family

5. 5. Self-Care Training

   • Develop a system for debriefing

   • Develop a buddy system

   • Self-care exercises: deep breathing, prayer, meditation, yoga

Challenges to the care of the dying during a disaster include a loss of medical infrastructure and scarce medical or physical resources. Palliative care training for non-palliative care specialists can be instructive for the development of palliative care training for medical care responders after disasters. Applying standards, identifying goals of care for the expectant patient, communication to the patient and family members, if available, can help reduce suffering of this group of devastatingly vulnerable patients. In addition, peer support, on-site discussions and debriefing, and problem-solving when resources are limited will help alleviate moral distress among the providers.

In many countries, ambulance personnel are authorized to start or stop resuscitation efforts in accordance with clinical guidelines. Research shows that decisions to withhold or terminate resuscitation and manage patient death scenes can be particularly challenging.

To identify preparation and support mechanisms for ambulance personnel who are authorized to withhold or terminate resuscitation efforts, and manage patient death in the field.

Methods: A scoping review provided an overview of international research in this area. A qualitative exploratory study was then undertaken. Focus groups were held with senior ambulance personnel currently working in clinical education, managerial, or pastoral support roles across New Zealand.

Well-supported clinical experiential learning and resolved personal experiences with grief and death were considered most useful to increase self-efficacy and coping with patient death. Participants felt some of the personal and interpersonal skills needed to manage death in the field were difficult to teach. Relatively little time is spent preparing ambulance personnel for the non-technical skills associated with resuscitation decision-making, particularly communicating with family and bystanders. Ambulance personnel responses and support-needs during or after the event are idiosyncratic. Ambulance personnel appear to primarily rely on colleagues and managers checking in and offering informal debriefing.

Results from this study identify opportunities for improvement in the preparation and support of ambulance personnel faced with managing patient death in the field. Clinical experience with supportive mentoring may provide the best opportunities for learning, but novices may not get exposure to patient death in this context. Ambulance personnel may benefit from training, which includes opportunities to role-play death notification and communication with family and bystanders at the scene of a patient death. Ambulance employers should allow downtime to facilitate personalized peer and managerial support where needed.

Patan Hospital, located in Kathmandu Valley, Nepal is a 400-bed hospital that has a long history of responding to natural disasters. Hospital personnel have worked with the Ministry of Health (MOH) and the World Health Organization (WHO) to develop standardized disaster response plans that were implemented in multiple hospital systems after the earthquake of 2015. These plans focused primarily on traumatic events but did not account for epidemics despite the prevalence of infectious diseases in Nepal.

To develop and test a robust epidemic/pandemic response plan at Patan Hospital in Kathmandu that would be generalizable to other hospitals nationwide.

Using the existing disaster plan in conjunction with public health and disaster medicine experts,we developed an epidemic response plan focusing on communication and coordination (between the hospital and MOH, among hospital administration and staff), logistics and supplies including personal protective equipment (PPE), and personnel and hospital incident command (IC) training. After development, we tested the plan using a high-fidelity, real-time simulation across the entire hospital and the hospital IC using actors and in conjunction with the MOH and WHO. We adjusted the plan based on lessons learned from this exercise.

Lessons learned from the high-fidelity simulation included the following: uncovering patient flow issues to avoid contamination/infection; layout issues with the isolation area, specifically accounting for donning/doffing of PPE; more sustained duration of response compared to a natural disaster with implications for staffing and supplies; communication difficulties unique to epidemics; need for national and regional surveillance and inter-facility planning and communication. We adjusted our plan accordingly and created a generalizable plan that can be deployed at an inter-facility and national level.

We learned that this process is feasible in resource-poor hospital systems. Challenges discovered in this process can lead to better national and system-wide preparedness.

The Canterbury Primary Response Group (CPRG) was formed following the threats of severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) and avian influenza worldwide. The possible impact of these viruses alerted health care professionals that a community-wide approach was needed to manage and coordinate a response to any outbreak or potential outbreak. In Canterbury, New Zealand, the CPRG group took the responsibility to coordinate and manage the regional, out of hospital, planning and response coordination to annual influenza threats and the possible escalation to pandemic outbreaks.

To outline the formation of a primary health and community-wide planning group, bringing together not only a wide range of health providers, but also key community agencies to plan strategies and responses to seasonal influenza and possible pandemic outbreaks.

CPRG has developed a Pandemic Plan that focuses on the processes, structures, and roles to support and coordinate general practice, community pharmacies, community nursing, and other primary health care providers in the reduction of, readiness for, response to, and recovery from an influenza pandemic. The plan could reasonably apply to other respiratory-type pandemics such as SARS.

A comprehensive group of health professionals and supporting agencies meet monthly (more often if required) under the chair of CPRG to share information of the influenza-like illness (ILI) situation, virus types, and spread, as well as support strategies and response activities. Regular communication information updates are produced and circulated amongst members and primary health providers in the region.

Given that most ILI health consultations and treatments are self or primary health administered and take place outside of hospital services, it is essential for providers to be informed and consistent with their responses and knowledge of the extent and symptoms of ILI and any likelihood of a pandemic.

Biosurveillance is critical for early detection of disease outbreaks and resource mobilization. Child care center (CCC) attendance has long been recognized as a significant independent predictor for respiratory and gastrointestinal diseases, but CCC surveillance is currently not part of the statewide disease surveillance system. The Michigan Child Care Related Infections Surveillance Program (MCRISP) is an independent, online reporting network with >30 local CCCs that was created to fill this surveillance gap.

To describe the capability of a novel CCC biosurveillance system (MCRISP) to report pediatric Influenza-Like Illness (ILI) and Acute Gastroenteritis (AGE) illness over three years to (i) assess both the timing and magnitude of epidemics in CCCs and (ii) compare CCC outbreak patterns with those of the state database.

MCRISP collates real-time syndromic reports of illness from local county CCCs. The statewide Michigan Disease Surveillance System (MDSS) collects reports of diagnosed illness from designated laboratories, clinics, and hospitals statewide. We assessed epidemic curves based on MCRISP incidence rates and MDSS case counts for ILI and AGE over three seasons (2014-7).

A total of 4,627 MCRISP cases (2,425 ILI and 2,202 AGE reports) were reported during the three years of study surveillance. Epidemic patterns (seasonal peaks, troughs, and breadth) for both ILI and AGE in CCCs mirrored those reported at county and state levels, respectively. Two distinguishing features of CCC ILI outbreaks were noted in all three seasons: MCRISP ILI rates remained elevated after MDSS influenza counts abated, and MCRISP rates consistently peaked prior to MDSS influenza peaks. Neither of these phenomena were observed in comparing AGE outbreaks between surveillance systems.

ILI and AGE incidence rates from the MCRISP network appeared to broadly mirror epidemics from the established state surveillance system. MCRISP may act as a sentinel system for larger community outbreaks of respiratory disease.

In emergencies, infants and young children are disproportionately affected due to specific food and fluid requirements, immature immune system, susceptibility to dehydration, and dependence on others. Provision of safe food and water to infants and young children is critical. However, it is challenging in the emergency context. Specific planning is vital to support infant and young child feeding in emergencies (IYCF-E).

To identify the extent to which Australian emergency management plans and guidance account for the needs of infants and young children.

An audit of Australian emergency management plans and guidance was conducted as a part of the 2018 World Breastfeeding Trends Initiative assessment of Australian infant feeding policies. All national and state/territory emergency preparedness plans, and a sample of local government area preparedness plans, response plans, and other guidance were identified and searched for content related to the needs of infants and young children. Plans and guidance were searched for content related to the needs of animals as a comparison.

Vulnerability of infants and young children was commonly noted. However, content related to supporting the specific needs of infants and young children through appropriate IYCF-E was almost totally absent. In some cases, the guidance that did exist was misleading or dangerous. No agency at the federal, state/territory, or local government level was identified as having met the responsibility for ensuring the needs of infants and young children. The absence of any coordinated response for the needs of infants and young children is in stark contrast to consideration of animal needs, which have a delegated authority, plans, and guidance at all levels of government.

Planning for the needs of infants and young children in emergencies in Australia is dangerously inadequate. Action should be taken to ensure that appropriate plans exist at all levels of government.

Children, who comprise 25% of the US population, are frequently victims of disasters and have special needs during these events.

To prepare NYC for a large-scale pediatric disaster, NYCPDC has worked with an increasing number of providers that initially included a small number of hospitals and agencies. Through a cooperative team approach, stakeholders now include public health, emergency management, and emergency medical services, 28 hospitals, community-based providers, and the Medical Reserve Corps.

The NYCPDC utilized an inclusive iterative process model whereby a desired plan was achieved by stakeholders reviewing the literature and current practice through discussion and consensus building. NYCPDC used this model in developing a comprehensive regional pediatric disaster plan.

The Plan included disaster scene triage (adapted for pediatric use) to transport (with prioritization) to surge and evacuation. Additionally, site-specific plans utilizing Guidelines and Templates now include Pediatric Long-Term Care Facilities, Hospital Pediatric Departments, Pediatric and Ob/Newborn/Neonatal Intensive Care Services and Outpatient/Urgent Care Centers. A force multiplier course in critical care for non-intensivists is provided. An extensive Pediatric Exercise program has been used to develop, operationalize and revise plans based on lessons learned. This includes pediatric tabletop, functional and full-scale exercises at individual hospitals leading to citywide exercises at 13 and subsequently all 28 hospitals caring for children.

The NYCPDC has comprehensively planned for the special needs of children during disasters utilizing a pediatric coalition based regional approach that matches pediatric resources to needs to provide best outcomes.

The NYCPDC has responded to real-time events (H1N1, Haiti Earthquake, Superstorm Sandy, Ebola), and participated in local (NYC boroughs and executive leadership) and nationwide coalitions (National Pediatric Disaster Coalition). The NYCPDC has had the opportunity to present their Pediatric Disaster Planning and Response efforts at local, national and International conferences.

Pediatric trauma is one of the leading causes of child mortality and morbidity and is a major challenge for healthcare systems worldwide. Treatment of pediatric trauma requires special attention according to the unique needs of children, especially in children affected by severe trauma who require life-saving treatments. It is essential to examine the preparedness of Emergency Departments (EDs) for admitting and treating pediatric casualties.

To develop a model for admitting and treating pediatric trauma casualties in EDs.

Seventeen health professionals were interviewed using a semi-structured qualitative tool. A quantitative questionnaire was distributed among general and pediatric EDs’ medical and nursing staff. Following the qualitative and quantitative findings, another round of interviews was performed to identify constraints, to construct a “Current Reality Tree,” and develop a model for admission and management of pediatric casualties in EDs. The model was validated by the National Council for Trauma and Emergency Medicine.

Lack of uniformity was found regarding age limit and levels of injury of pediatric patients. Most study participants believe that severe pediatric casualties should be concentrated in designated medical centers and that minor and major pediatric casualties should be treated in pediatric rather that general EDs. Pediatric emergency medicine specialists are preferred as case managers for pediatric casualties. Significant diversity in pediatric-care training was found. Based on qualitative and quantitative findings, a model for the optimal admitting and managing of pediatric casualties was designed.

To provide the best care for pediatric casualties and regulate its key aspects, clear statutory guidelines should be formulated at national and local levels. The model developed in this study considers EDs’ medical teams and policy leaders’ perceptions, and hence its significant contribution. Implementation of the findings and their integration in pediatric trauma care in EDs can significantly improve pediatric emergency medical services.

The Illinois EMSC Pediatric Facility Recognition Program was implemented in 1998. The objective was to identify the capability of a hospital to provide optimal pediatric emergency and critical care. Beginning in 2004, steps were taken to integrate pediatric disaster preparedness into the facility recognition process.

The goal of this study was to identify strengths and areas for improvement in pediatric disaster preparedness in participating Chicago hospitals.

The impact of the EMSC Pediatric Preparedness Checklist was assessed during the 2016 Pediatric Facility Recognition hospital site surveys. The following components were surveyed as they relate to pediatrics: Overall Emergency Operations Plan (EOP), Surge Capacity, Decontamination, Reunification/Patient Tracking, Security, Evacuation, Mass Casualty Triage/JumpSTART, Children with Special Health Care Needs/Children with Functional Access Needs, Pharmaceutical Preparedness, Recovery, Exercise/Drills/Trainings. All survey items were extracted, collated, and reviewed.

Fourteen Chicago hospitals participated in the survey. Almost all hospitals (93%) surveyed indicated that they consult staff with pediatric expertise when updating their EOP, incorporate pediatric trained mental health professionals into their disaster call lists (93%), and integrate staff with pediatric focus into their incident command system/emergency operation center during a disaster (79%). Almost all of the hospitals (93%) had an infant/child abduction plan and all hospitals (100%) were testing the process at least once per year. Finally, almost all of the hospitals (93%) had incorporated a patient connection program into their tracking and reunification plan. However, not all hospitals included drills for pediatric surge, decontamination, and evacuation. Less than one-third of the hospitals had pediatric components in their alternate treatment site plans. Half of the hospitals did not have pediatric components incorporated into their decontamination plans.

Integrating the EMSC Pediatric Preparedness Checklist surveys into the recognition process is an innovative approach to improve pediatric disaster planning and preparedness in hospitals.

The Illinois EMSC Pediatric Facility Recognition Program was implemented in 1998. The objective was to identify the capability of a hospital to provide optimal pediatric emergency and critical care. Beginning in 2004, steps were taken to integrate pediatric disaster preparedness into the facility recognition process.

The goal of this study was to identify the impact of the EMSC Pediatric Preparedness Checklist across time in Chicago hospitals undergoing Pediatric Facility Recognition.

Chicago hospitals were evaluated during the 2012 and 2016 Pediatric Facility Recognition Program. The following components were surveyed as they relate to pediatrics: Overall Emergency Operations Plan (EOP), Surge Capacity, Decontamination, Reunification/Patient Tracking, Security, Evacuation, Mass Casualty Triage/JumpSTART, Children with Special Health Care Needs/Children with Functional Access Needs, Pharmaceutical Preparedness, Recovery, Exercise/Drills/Trainings. Data from 2012 and 2014 checklist categories were compared and p-values were computed utilizing Fisher’s Exact Test. A p-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Stockpiling of staging areas or having ready access to resuscitation supplies increased 46% (p < 0.05), testing of pediatric surge capacity in previous 24 months decreased 43% (p < 0.05), maintaining warmed water source for decontamination decreased 43% (p < 0.05), and having familiarity of evacuation procedures in ED, pediatric, and nursery personnel decreased 42% (p < 0.05). Although not statistically significant, the training of pediatric staff with JumpSTART triage increased 59%, EOP containing a pediatric reunification process increased by 36%, the presence of specific staff plans to allow care of dependents increased for children (29%), elderly (32%) and pets (35%), integration of a pediatric component into hospital EOP increased by 29%, and identification of an alternate treatment site for children decreased by 25%.

Integrating the EMSC Pediatric Preparedness Checklist surveys into the facility recognition process impacts pediatric disaster preparedness and planning, and identifies areas of improvement in hospitals.

Children are frequently victims of disasters. However, gaps remain in disaster planning for pediatric patients. The New York City Pediatric Disaster Coalition (NYCPDC) is funded by the New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene (DOHMH) to prepare NYC for mass casualty incidents that involve large numbers of children.

On April 26, 2018, the NYCPDC conducted a first full-scale exercise with the New York Fire Department (FDNY) testing evacuation, patient tracking, communications, and emergency response of the obstetrics, newborn, and neonatal units at Staten Island University Hospital North. The goal of the exercise was to evaluate current obstetrics/newborn/neonatal plans and assess the hospital’s ability to evacuate patients.

The exercise planning process included a review of existing obstetrics/newborn/neonatal plans, four group planning meetings, specific area meetings, and plan revisions. The exercise incorporated scenario-driven, operations-based activities, which challenged participants to employ the facility’s existing evacuation plans during an emergency.

The exercise assessed the following: communication, emergency operation plans, evacuation, patient tracking, supplies, and staffing. Internal and external evaluators rated exercise performance on a scale of 1-4. Evaluators completed an exercise evaluation guide based on the Master Scenario Event List.

An After Action Report was written based on the information from the exercise evaluation guides, participant feedback forms, hot wash session, and after-action review meeting. Strengths included the meaningful improvement of plans before the exercise (including the fire department) and the overall meeting of exercise objectives.

Lessons learned included: addressing gaps in effective internal and external communications, adequate supplies of space, staff, and equipment needed for vertical evacuations in addition to providing staging and alternate care sites with sufficient patient care and electrical power resources. The lessons learned are being utilized to improve existing hospital plans to prepare for future full-scale exercise and or real-time events.

Effects of a disaster on a community’s mental health can persist after the physical effects of the event have passed. The pediatric population is often overrepresented in disasters and prone to serious mental health disorders based on their age and parental/community response. Pediatric primary healthcare providers require the psychosocial skills necessary to work in disaster zones and to care for children in disasters.

Pediatric Disaster Mental Health Intervention (PDMHI) was initially developed in response to Superstorm Sandy’s impact on children and their families in New York City. The objective was to develop training for primary care providers in pediatric disaster mental healthcare and to study its impact on the trainees.

A faculty of experts in pediatric mental health, psychiatry, psychology, and disaster preparedness was convened to develop curriculum. The faculty developed a four-hour intervention to equip healthcare providers with the skills and knowledge necessary to care for pediatric patients with mental health problems stemming from a disaster via evaluation, triage, intervention, and referral.

Three PDMHI training sessions were held. A total of 67 providers were trained. Of these, there were 31 pediatricians, 18 nurses, 8 social workers, 4 psychologists, 2 psychiatrists, and 4 others. Pre- and post-tests measured knowledge before and impact 3 months post-intervention. 62.5% of responding primary care providers made changes to their practice. 92% felt better equipped to identify, treat, and refer patients. 81% would be willing to work in a disaster zone and felt prepared to treat patients with disaster mental health issues.

PDMHI covers psychosocial responses to disasters from normal to mental health disorders. Participants gained tools for managing pediatric mental health issues in primary care. Study data showed an increase in the participants perceived knowledge and skills about pediatric disaster mental health, and willingness to participate in future disasters.

More than 14 million children in the United States attend summer camps yearly, including many special medical needs children. Summer camps are at risk for multiple pediatric casualties during a disaster. The American Camp Association, in the 2017 critical issues report, identified emergency preparedness as the top critical health and safety issue. Camps, compared to school-based settings, face unique challenges when planning for disasters, but research has been challenging because of the lack of access to camp leadership and data.

Provide a targeted up-to-date synopsis on the current state of disaster preparedness and ongoing collaborative research and technology interventions for improving preparedness among summer camps.

Researchers partnered with a national health records system (CampDoc.com) and American Academy of Pediatrics disaster experts to review results from a national camp survey. Main themes were identified to assess gaps and develop strategies for improving disaster preparedness.

169 camps responses were received from national camp leadership. A substantial proportion of camps were missing 4 critical areas of disaster planning: 1) Most lacked online emergency plans (53%), methods to communicate information to parents (25%), or strategies to identify children for evacuation/reunification (40%); 2) Disaster plans failed to account for special/medical needs children (38%); 3) Staff training rates were low for weather (58%), evacuation (46%), and lockdown (36%); 4) Most camps (75%) did not plan with disaster organizations.

Collaboration with industry and disaster experts will be key to address the gaps identified. Current research and interventions include the recent release of a communication alert tool allowing camps to send mass text emergency notifications. Additionally, a recent pilot to incorporate disaster plans into the electronic health records platform emphasizing communication, evacuation, and identification of local experts has begun. Efforts to develop a unified disaster tool kit for summer camps remains a challenge.

Triaging plays an important role in providing suitable care to the largest number of casualties in a disaster setting. We developed the Pediatric Physiological and Anatomical Triage score (PPATS) as a new secondary triage method.

This study was performed to validate the accuracy of the PPATS in pediatric patients with burn injuries.

A retrospective review of pediatric patients with burn injuries younger than 15 years old registered in the Japan Trauma Databank from 2004 to 2016 was conducted. The PPATS, which was assigned scores from 0 to 22, was calculated based on vital signs, anatomical abnormalities, and need for life-saving intervention. The PPATS categorized the patients by their priority and defined the intensive care unit (ICU)-indicated patients as those with PPARSs more than 6. This study compared the accuracy of prediction of ICU-indicated patients between the PPATS and Triage Revised Trauma Score (TRTS).

Among 87 pediatric patients, 62 (71%) were admitted to the ICU. The median age was 3 years (interquartile range: 1 to 9 years old). The sensitivity and specificity of the PPATS were 74% and 36%, respectively. The area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve was not different between the PPTAS [0.51 (95% confidence interval: -0.51–1.48) and the TRTS [0.51 (-1.17–1.62), p=0.57]. Regression analysis showed a significant association between the PPATS and the Injury Severity Score (ISS) (r2=0.39, p<0.01). On the other hand, there is no association between the TRTS and the ISS (r2=0.00, p=0.79).

The accuracy of the PPATS was not superior to that of current secondary-triage methods. However, the PPATS had the advantage of objectively determining the triage priority ranking based on the severity of the pediatric patients with burn injuries.

Weather-related natural disasters are increasing in frequency and intensity, severely impacting communities. The patient demographic requiring assistance in a disaster is changing from acute traumas to chronic disease exacerbations. Adequate management requires a multidisciplinary healthcare approach. Pharmacists have been recorded in various disaster roles in literature. However, their roles within these disaster health teams are not well-established and do not fully utilize their skill sets.

To identify where pharmacists roles are within the four phases of a disaster – prevention, preparedness, response, and recovery (PPRR), and to determine the barriers to pharmacists being better integrated into disaster teams.

Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 28 international key stakeholders and pharmacists. Interviews were transcribed and analyzed using both open and axial manual coding, as well as the text-analytics software Leximancer®. The use of these two methods provided triangulation of methods for reliability of results. This research project was covered by QUT ethics approval number 1700000106.

The themes identified were community, government, "disaster management," "pharmacy," and "barriers and facilitators." The Leximancer® analysis compared the different disaster perspective and experience levels of the participants. The more experienced disaster health professionals who had worked closely with pharmacists believed they were capable of undertaking more roles in a disaster.

Pharmacists have been placed in the logistics "silo" for their role in disaster management supply chain operations. However, pharmacists have the expertise, knowledge, and skills which transcend this "silo" to work across the multiple health roles in disasters. Pharmacists are identified as a critical piece to the puzzle in the disaster management throughout the PPRR cycle. They are capable of undertaking more roles in disasters in addition to the established logistics role. The barriers identified need to be addressed for the better integration of pharmacists into disaster teams.

Pharmaceutical services for public health emergencies, such as the Zika virus (ZIKV) epidemic, are relevant for service effectiveness in the Brazilian health system. Pharmacists can act strategically in risk reduction. However, official guidelines do not consider pharmaceutical services when approaching health emergencies.

To identify and understand primary healthcare pharmacist interventions in risk reduction for the recent ZIKV epidemic in Brazil.

The study took place in Campo Grande, Mato Grosso do Sul, in November 2017. A semi-structured questionnaire was developed, including general issues related to knowledge of Zika, risk communication, and the pharmacist's role in patient care for ZIKV disease. The instrument was pre-tested. Primary healthcare center (PHC) pharmacists were subsequently interviewed. Aspects related to knowledge, risk reduction measures, and role were categorized and analyzed. The project received approval from the Institutional Review Board (IRB) at the Sergio Arouca National School of Public Health.

Forty-two of the 48 PHC pharmacists in Campo Grande were interviewed. Risk reduction measures were cited by most interviewees. Among these strategies, 92% were collective measures, such as making information available for the population (30%) and for the health workers (8%), and vector control strategies (43%). Use of mosquito nets was the most cited individual risk-reduction strategy. Only one pharmacist cited risk for pregnant women and suggested birth control as a strategy. Another pharmacist pointed to ZIKV “treatment.” No interviewee mentioned measures related to preparedness of pharmaceutical services.

PHC pharmacists do not place themselves at the frontline of risk reduction for the ZIKV epidemic. In the face of potential hazards and consequences of this disease, action by pharmacists is deemed critical. This study highlights pharmacist's misconceptions and lack of focused knowledge, pointing to the need for training and capacity-building in order to increase quality of care and positive management of future epidemics.

The pharmacist’s role in disasters is just as important as in everyday practice. Lack of access to health care services and interruptions to continuity of medication care are the major concerns for chronic disease patients during disasters. Pharmacists’ responsibilities during crises is undefined and their skills and knowledge are underutilized.

To convene an expert panel to discuss the role of pharmacists in disasters and the specific roles they could be undertaking in a disaster, prioritizing the roles in order of importance.

There were 15 key opinion leaders identified as experts in their knowledge of pharmacists’ roles and the disaster health management field who agreed to participate in the three rounds of surveys. The first round provided the panelists with a list of 46 roles identified from previous research conducted and the literature. The panelists were asked to rank their opinion of pharmacist’s capability of undertaking each role on a 5-point Likert scale and consensus was set at 80%. There were three rounds of surveys with the final round presenting the results for the panel to provide qualitative comments on the results and roles. The roles were broken up into the four phases of disaster management – prevention, preparedness, response, and recovery (PPRR).

Out of the 46 roles provided to the panelists, consensus was reached on 43 roles with 80% of panelists being in agreement. The experts identified pharmacists had roles across the entire PPRR cycle. The roles included pharmacists being further integrated into disaster teams and managing low-acuity patients requiring chronic disease medications.

This Delphi study begins the process of defining roles for pharmacists in disasters. It can assist policymakers in providing changes to legislative frameworks to allow pharmacists to undertake the roles identified as being beneficial to a community in a disaster.

Every year, 71% of all deaths globally are due to NCDs. Over 85% of these deaths occur in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), with 36% of all reported deaths in Rwanda attributed to NCDs. Approximately 24 million lives are lost each year in LMICs due to emergency medical conditions. The collaboration between VCU and the EMS Rwanda designed and implemented a pre-hospital medical emergencies training course and train-the-trainers program to address the rise of NCDs.

During the course, pre and post 50 assessment questions were administered. Two cohorts participated 25 prehospital staff identified by EMS to form an instructor core and 19 emergency staff from public hospitals who are likely to respond to local emergencies in the community. A two-day EMCC was developed using established best practices. The Instructor core completed EMCC 1 and a one-day educator course and then taught the second cohort (EMCC2). Student’s t-test and matched paired t-tests were used to evaluate the assessments.

Mean score on EMCC 1 was 43% (SD: 20) compared to 85% (SD: 5) on post-course assessment. Pre-assessment failure rate was 88%. Mean scores for EMCC 2 were 45% (SD: 14) and 81% (SD: 10) on post-assessment. Pre-assessment score was low (50%). A paired t-test comparing pre-course to post-course assessment means demonstrated an increase by 42% (SD 30) for EMCC 1 (p<0.001) and 37% (SD: 14) for EMCC 2 (p<0.001) with 95% confidence. No items had to be removed from analysis based on the discrimination index (di).

NCDs often present as emergencies such as myocardial infarction and stroke. Effective management of these in the prehospital setting is essential to optimal outcomes. This study effectively implemented a training program in Kigali, Rwanda and created an instructor core to allow scale-up of effective pre-hospital services across the country.