Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-29T04:47:22.315Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Ideology, shared moral narratives, and the dark side of collective rationalization

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 April 2020

Jesse Graham Open the ORCID record for Jesse Graham [Opens in a new window]
Jesse Graham*
Affiliation:
Eccles School of Business, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT84112. jesse.graham@eccles.utah.eduhttps://eccles.utah.edu/team/jesse-graham/
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This commentary extends the target article's useful concepts to consider collective instances of representational exchange. When groups collectively rationalize their actions, entire networks of beliefs and desires can be created and maintained in the form of shared moral narratives and system-justifying ideologies. These collective rationalization cases illustrate how adaptive advantages can come at the expense of the truth.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 43 , 2020 , e37
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Graham, J. & Haidt, J. (2010) Beyond beliefs: Religions bind individuals into moral communities. Personality and Social Psychology Review 14:140–50.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Graham, J. & Haidt, J. (2012) Sacred values and evil adversaries: A moral foundations approach. In: The social psychology of morality: Exploring the causes of good and evil, ed. Shaver, P. & Mikulincer, M., pp. 11–31. APA Books.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graham, J. & Yudkin, D. (in press) Variations in moral concerns across political ideology: Moral foundations, hidden tribes, and righteous division. In: The Oxford Handbook of Moral Psychology, ed. Vargas, M. & Doris, J.. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Haidt, J. & Graham, J. (2009) The planet of the Durkheimians, where community, authority and sacredness are foundations of morality. In: Social and psychological bases of ideology and system justification, ed. Jost, J. T., Kay, A. C. & Thorisdottir, H., pp. 371–401. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jost, J. T. (2006) The end of the end of ideology. American Psychologist 61:651–70.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jost, J. T. & Banaji, M. R. (1994) The role of stereotyping in system-justification and the production of false consciousness. British Journal of Social Psychology 33(1):1–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jost, J. T., Becker, J., Osborne, D. & Badaan, V. (2017) Missing in (collective) action: Ideology, system justification, and the motivational antecedents of two types of protest behavior. Current Directions in Psychological Science 26:99–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winthrop, R. C. (1852) Addresses and speeches on various occasions: 1835–1851, vol. 1. Little, Brown.Google Scholar