Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-29T05:07:26.600Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Rationalization and self-sabotage

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 April 2020

Jason D'Cruz Open the ORCID record for Jason D'Cruz [Opens in a new window]
Jason D'Cruz*
Affiliation:
Department of Philosophy, University at Albany, State University of New York, Albany, NY12222. jdcruz@albany.eduwww.jasondcruz.com
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In making the case that “rationalization is rational,” Cushman downplays its signature liability: Rationalization exposes a person to the hazard of delusion and self-sabotage. In paradigm cases, rationalization undermines instrumental rationality by introducing inaccuracies into the representational map required for planning and effective agency.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 43 , 2020 , e32
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

D'Cruz, J. (2015) Rationalization, evidence, and pretense. Ratio 28(3):318–31. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/rati.12072.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gendler, T. S. (2007) Self-deception as pretense. Philosophical Perspectives 21(1):231–58. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1520-8583.2007.00127.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramsey, F. P. (1931) The foundations of mathematics and other essays. Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Shalvi, S., Gino, F., Barkan, R. & Ayal, S. (2015) Self-serving justifications: Doing wrong and feeling moral. Current Directions in Psychological Science 24(2):125–30. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721414553264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar