No CrossRef data available.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 18 March 2013
In the context of a broad welcome to Bullot & Reber's (B&R's) proposals concerning the incorporation of contextual awareness into the study of the psychology of art appreciation, I raise two concerns. First, the proposal makes no allowance for degrees of relevance of contextual awareness to appreciation. Second, the authors assume that “basic exposure” and “artistic understanding” can be maintained as separate phases or modes, but this may be more problematic than anticipated.
Target article
The artful mind meets art history: Toward a psycho-historical framework for the science of art appreciation
Related commentaries (27)
A bridge too far: From basic exposure to understanding in artistic experience
Acknowledging the diversity of aesthetic experiences: Effects of style, meaning, and context
Aesthetic meanings and aesthetic emotions: How historical and intentional knowledge expand aesthetic experience
Art appreciation and aesthetic feeling as objects of explanation
Artistic understanding as embodied simulation
Artists' intentions and artwork meanings: Some complications
Bridging two worlds that care about art: Psychological and historical approaches to art appreciation
Causal history, actual and apparent
Context, causality, and appreciation
Contextual information processing of brain in art appreciation
Distinguishing intention and function in art appreciation
Educating the design stance: Issues of coherence and transgression
Exposure, experience, and intention recognition: Take it from the bottom
Extended artistic appreciation
Extending the psycho-historical framework to understand artistic production
Fechner revisited: Towards an inclusive approach to aesthetics
History and essence in human cognition
Integrating holism and reductionism in the science of art perception
Memories of Art
Mindful art
Neuroaesthetics: Range and restrictions
Normative and scientific approaches to the understanding and evaluation of art
Psychological and neural responses to art embody viewer and artwork histories
Questioning the necessity of the aesthetic modes
The artistic design stance and the interpretation of Paleolithic art
The duality of art: Body and soul
“The anti-developmental, the anti-narrative, the anti-historical”: Mondrian as a paradigmatic artist for empirical aesthetics
Author response
A psycho-historical research program for the integrative science of art