We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
We study the following natural strong variant of destroying Borel ideals:
$\mathbb {P}$
$+$
-destroys
$\mathcal {I}$
if
$\mathbb {P}$
adds an
$\mathcal {I}$
-positive set which has finite intersection with every
$A\in \mathcal {I}\cap V$
. Also, we discuss the associated variants
of the star-uniformity and the star-covering numbers of these ideals.
Among other results, (1) we give a simple combinatorial characterisation when a real forcing
$\mathbb {P}_I$
can
$+$
-destroy a Borel ideal
$\mathcal {J}$
; (2) we discuss many classical examples of Borel ideals, their
$+$
-destructibility, and cardinal invariants; (3) we show that the Mathias–Prikry,
$\mathbb {M}(\mathcal {I}^*)$
-generic real
$+$
-destroys
$\mathcal {I}$
iff
$\mathbb {M}(\mathcal {I}^*)\ +$
-destroys
$\mathcal {I}$
iff
$\mathcal {I}$
can be
$+$
-destroyed iff
$\mathrm {cov}^*(\mathcal {I},+)>\omega $
; (4) we characterise when the Laver–Prikry,
$\mathbb {L}(\mathcal {I}^*)$
-generic real
$+$
-destroys
$\mathcal {I}$
, and in the case of P-ideals, when exactly
$\mathbb {L}(\mathcal {I}^*)$
$+$
-destroys
$\mathcal {I}$
; and (5) we briefly discuss an even stronger form of destroying ideals closely related to the additivity of the null ideal.
Let
$\mathcal {I}$
be an ideal on
$\omega $
. For
$f,\,g\in \omega ^{\omega }$
we write
$f \leq _{\mathcal {I}} g$
if
$f(n) \leq g(n)$
for all
$n\in \omega \setminus A$
with some
$A\in \mathcal {I}$
. Moreover, we denote
$\mathcal {D}_{\mathcal {I}}=\{f\in \omega ^{\omega }: f^{-1}[\{n\}]\in \mathcal {I} \text { for every } n\in \omega \}$
(in particular,
$\mathcal {D}_{\mathrm {Fin}}$
denotes the family of all finite-to-one functions).
We examine cardinal numbers
$\mathfrak {b}(\geq _{\mathcal {I}}\cap (\mathcal {D}_{\mathcal {I}} \times \mathcal {D}_{\mathcal {I}}))$
and
$\mathfrak {b}(\geq _{\mathcal {I}}\cap (\mathcal {D}_{\mathrm {Fin}}\times \mathcal {D}_{\mathrm {Fin}}))$
describing the smallest sizes of unbounded from below with respect to the order
$\leq _{\mathcal {I}}$
sets in
$\mathcal {D}_{\mathrm {Fin}}$
and
$\mathcal {D}_{\mathcal {I}}$
, respectively. For a maximal ideal
$\mathcal {I}$
, these cardinals were investigated by M. Canjar in connection with coinitial and cofinal subsets of the ultrapowers.
We show that
$\mathfrak {b}(\geq _{\mathcal {I}}\cap (\mathcal {D}_{\mathrm {Fin}} \times \mathcal {D}_{\mathrm {Fin}})) =\mathfrak {b}$
for all ideals
$\mathcal {I}$
with the Baire property and that
$\aleph _1 \leq \mathfrak {b}(\geq _{\mathcal {I}}\cap (\mathcal {D}_{\mathcal {I}} \times \mathcal {D}_{\mathcal {I}})) \leq \mathfrak {b}$
for all coanalytic weak P-ideals (this class contains all
$\bf {\Pi ^0_4}$
ideals). What is more, we give examples of Borel (even
$\bf {\Sigma ^0_2}$
) ideals
$\mathcal {I}$
with
$\mathfrak {b}(\geq _{\mathcal {I}}\cap (\mathcal {D}_{\mathcal {I}} \times \mathcal {D}_{\mathcal {I}}))=\mathfrak {b}$
as well as with
$\mathfrak {b}(\geq _{\mathcal {I}}\cap (\mathcal {D}_{\mathcal {I}} \times \mathcal {D}_{\mathcal {I}})) =\aleph _1$
.
We also study cardinals
$\mathfrak {b}(\geq _{\mathcal {I}}\cap (\mathcal {D}_{\mathcal {J}} \times \mathcal {D}_{\mathcal {K}}))$
describing the smallest sizes of sets in
$\mathcal {D}_{\mathcal {K}}$
not bounded from below with respect to the preorder
$\leq _{\mathcal {I}}$
by any member of
$\mathcal {D}_{\mathcal {J}}\!$
. Our research is partially motivated by the study of ideal-QN-spaces: those cardinals describe the smallest size of a space which is not ideal-QN.
We investigate whether the property of having linear quotients is inherited by ideals generated by multigraded shifts of a Borel ideal and a squarefree Borel ideal. We show that the ideal generated by the first multigraded shifts of a Borel ideal has linear quotients, as do the ideal generated by the $k$th multigraded shifts of a principal Borel ideal and an equigenerated squarefree Borel ideal for each $k$. Furthermore, we show that equigenerated squarefree Borel ideals share the property of being squarefree Borel with the ideals generated by multigraded shifts.
We investigate which filters on ω can contain towers, that is, a modulo finite descending sequence without any pseudointersection (in ${[\omega ]^\omega }$). We prove the following results:
(1) Many classical examples of nice tall filters contain no towers (in ZFC).
(2) It is consistent that tall analytic P-filters contain towers of arbitrary regular height (simultaneously for many regular cardinals as well).
(3) It is consistent that all towers generate nonmeager filters (this answers a question of P. Borodulin-Nadzieja and D. Chodounský), in particular (consistently) Borel filters do not contain towers.
(4) The statement “Every ultrafilter contains towers.” is independent of ZFC (this improves an older result of K. Kunen, J. van Mill, and C. F. Mills).
Furthermore, we study many possible logical (non)implications between the existence of towers in filters, inequalities between cardinal invariants of filters (${\rm{ad}}{{\rm{d}}^{\rm{*}}}\left( {\cal F} \right)$, ${\rm{co}}{{\rm{f}}^{\rm{*}}}\left( {\cal F} \right)$, ${\rm{no}}{{\rm{n}}^{\rm{*}}}\left( {\cal F} \right)$, and ${\rm{co}}{{\rm{v}}^{\rm{*}}}\left( {\cal F} \right)$), and the existence of Luzin type families (of size $\ge {\omega _2}$), that is, if ${\cal F}$ is a filter then ${\cal X} \subseteq {[\omega ]^\omega }$ is an ${\cal F}$-Luzin family if $\left\{ {X \in {\cal X}:|X \setminus F| = \omega } \right\}$ is countable for every $F \in {\cal F}$.
Recommend this
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this to your organisation's collection.