Hostname: page-component-7dd5485656-g8tfn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-31T03:37:55.275Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

ORTHOGONAL FUNCTIONS AND ZERNIKE POLYNOMIALS—A RANDOM VARIABLE INTERPRETATION

Part of: Harmonic analysis in one variable

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 November 2009

C. S. WITHERS
C. S. WITHERS*
Affiliation:
Applied Mathematics Group, Industrial Research Ltd, Box 31-310, Lower Hutt, New Zealand (email: c.withers@irl.cri.nz)
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

There are advantages in viewing orthogonal functions as functions generated by a random variable from a basis set of functions. Let Y be a random variable distributed uniformly on [0,1]. We give two ways of generating the Zernike radial polynomials with parameter l, {Zll+2n(x), n≥0}. The first is using the standard basis {xn,n≥0} and the random variable Y1/(l+1). The second is using the nonstandard basis {xl+2n,n≥0} and the random variable Y1/2. Zernike polynomials are important in the removal of lens aberrations, in characterizing video images with a small number of numbers, and in automatic aircraft identification.

Keywords

Zernike polynomialsorthogonal functions

MSC classification

Secondary: 42A16: Fourier coefficients, Fourier series of functions with special properties, special Fourier series

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
The ANZIAM Journal , Volume 50 , Issue 3: This Special Issue is dedicated to Dr Stephen White , January 2009 , pp. 435 - 444
Copyright
Copyright © Australian Mathematical Society 2009

References

[1]Abramowitz, M. and Stegun, I. A., Handbook of mathematical functions, Volume 55 of Applied Mathematics Series (US Department of Commerce, National Bureau of Standards, Washington, DC 1964).Google Scholar
[2]Bhatia, A. B. and Wolf, E., “The Zernike circle polynomials occurring in diffraction theory”, Proc. Phys. Soc. B 65 (1952) 909–910.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[3]Bhatia, A. B. and Wolf, E., “On the circle polynomials of Zernike and related orthogonal sets”, Proc. Cambridge Philos. Soc. 50 (1954) 40–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[4]Geronimus, Y. L., Polynomials orthogonal on a circle and interval (Pergamon Press, Oxford, 1960).Google Scholar
[5]Malacara, D. and DeVore, S. L., “Interfertogram evaluation and wavefront fitting”, in: Optical shop testing (ed. D. Malacara), (Wiley, New York, 1992) 455–499.Google Scholar
[6]Prata, A. and Rusch, W. V. T., “Algorithm for computation of Zernike polynomials expansion coefficients”, Appl. Optim. 28 (1989) 749–754.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
[7]Teague, M. R., “Image analysis via the general theory of moments”, J. Opt. Soc. Amer. 70 (1980) 920–930.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[8]Wang, J. Y. and Silva, D. E., “Wave-front interpretation with Zernike polynomials”, Appl. Optics 19 (1980) 1510–1518.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
[9]Weisstein, E., “Zernike polynomial”, http://mathworld.wolfgram/ZernikePolynomial.html (1999).Google Scholar
[10]Withers, C. S., “Mercer’s theorem and Fredholm resolvents”, Bull. Aust. Math. Soc. 11 (1974) 373–380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[11]Withers, C. S., “Fredholm theory for arbitrary measure spaces”, Bull. Aust. Math. Soc. 12 (1975) 283–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[12]Withers, C. S., “Fredholm equations have uniformly convergent solutions”, J. Math. Anal. Appl. 64 (1978) 602–609.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[13]Withers, C. S. and Nadarajah, S., “Orthogonal polynomials via random variables”, to appear in Utilitas Mathematica.Google Scholar