Hostname: page-component-7f64f4797f-m2b9p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-11-04T03:09:04.529Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A cross-situational test of utility theory

Review products

Commentary onRachlinHoward, BattalioRay, KagelJohn and GreenLeonard (1981) Maximization theory in behavioral psychology. BBS 4:371–417.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 February 2010

Gene M. Heyman
Gene M. Heyman
Affiliation:
Department of Psychophysiological and Physiological Sciences, University of Chicago, Chicago, lll. 60637
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'

Information

Type
Continuing Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 6 , Issue 2 , June 1983 , pp. 324
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1983

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Allison, J. (1976) Contrast, induction, fiscilitation, suppression, and conservation. journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behacior 25:185–98. [SEGL]Google Scholar
Allison, J. (1979) Demand economics and experimental psychology. Behavioral Science 24:403–15. [SEGL]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allison, J. (1981) Two cheers for maximization theory. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 4:388–89. [SEGL]Google Scholar
Barash, D. P. (1977) Sociobiology and behavior. Elsevier. [PTPW]Google Scholar
Barlow, D. H., ed. (1981) Behavioral assessment of adult disorders. Guilford Press. [PTPW]Google Scholar
Baum, W. M. (1974) On two types of deviation from the matching law: Bias and undermatching. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior 22:231–42. [SEGL]CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baum, W. M. (1979) Matching, underinatching, and overmatching in studies of choice. Journal of Experimental Analysis of Behavior 32:269–81. [GMH]Google ScholarPubMed
Baum, W. M. & Nevin, J. A. (1981) Maximization theory: Some empirical problems. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 4:389–90. [GMH, PTPW]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, J. S., Martin, R. C. & Morrow, M. W. (1964) Self-punitive behavior in the rat: Facilitative effects of punishment on resistance to extinction. journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology 57:127–33. [PTPW]CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Butler, J. (1950) Five sermons preached at the Rolls Chapel. Bobbs-Merrill. [PTPW]Google Scholar
Catania, A. C., ed. (1968) Contemporary research in operant behavior. Scott, Foresman. [ACC]Google Scholar
Catania, A. C. (1979) Learning. Prentice-Hall. [ACC]Google Scholar
Catania, A. C. (1980) Freedom of choice: A behavioral analysis. In: The psychology of learning and motivation, vol. 14. ed. Bower, G. H., pp. 97–145. Academic Press. [ACC]Google Scholar
Catania, A. C. & Sagvolden, T. (1980) Preference for free choice over forced choice in pigeons. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior 34:77–86. [ACC]Google Scholar
Collier, G. H., Hirsch, E. & Hamlin, P. H. (1972) The ecological determinants of reinforcement in the rat. Physiology and Behavior 9:705–16. [SRH]Google Scholar
Elsmore, T. (1979) Evaluating the strength of heroin-maintained behavior. Invited address, meeting of the Association of Behavior Analysis, Dearborn, Mich. [SRH]Google Scholar
Fantino, E. J. (1981) Is maximization theory general, and is it refutable? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 4:390–91. [SRH, PTPW]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fantino, E., Squires, N., Delbruck, N. & Peterson, C. (1972) Choice behavior and the accessibility of the reinforcer. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior 18:35–43. [GMH]Google Scholar
Ferster, C. B. & Skinner, B. F. (1957) Schedules of reinforcement. AppletonCentury-Crofts. [GMH]Google Scholar
Findley, J. D. (1958) Preference and switching under concurrent scheduling. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior 1:123–44. [GMH]CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gibbon, J. (1977) Scalar expectancy theory and Weber's Law in animal timing. Psychological Review 84:279–325. [JG]Google Scholar
Goldstein, A. P., Carr, E. G., Davidson, W. & Wehr, P. (in press) In response to aggression. Pergamon Press. [HR]Google Scholar
Gould, S. J. (1981) The ghost of Protagoras. New York Review of Books 28:42–44. [BS]Google Scholar
Green, L., Kagel, J. H. & Battalio, R. C. (in press) Ratio schedules of reinforcement and their relationship to economic theories of labor supply. In: Quantitative analysis of behavior, vol. 2, ed. Commons, M., Herrnstein, R. J. & Rachlin, H.. Bellinger. [PTPW]Google Scholar
Hebb, D. O. (1971) Comment on altruism: The comparative evidence. Psychological Bulletin 76:409–10. [PTPW]Google Scholar
Herrnstein, R. J. (1970) On the law of effect. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior 13:243–66. [BS]Google Scholar
Herrnstein, R. J. (1981) A first law for behavioral analysis. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 4:392–95. [GMH, SRH]Google Scholar
Heyman, G. M. (1982) Is time allocation elicited behavior? In: Quantitative analyses of behavior, matching and maximizing accounts, ed. Herrnstein, R. J.. Ballinger Press, in press. [GMH]Google Scholar
Heyman, G. M. & Luce, R. D. (1979) Operant matching is not a logical consequence of maximizing reinforcement rate. Animal Learning and Behavior 7:133–40. [GMH]Google Scholar
Hobsbawm, E. J. (1964) Laboring men: Studies in the history of labor. Weidenfeld and Nicolson. [BS]Google Scholar
Houston, A. I. & McFarland, D. J. (1980) Behavioral resilience and its relation to demand functions. In: Limits to action: The allocation of individual behavior, ed. Staddon, J.E.R.. Academic Press. [HR]Google Scholar
Houston, A. I. & Staddon, J.E.R. (1981) Optimality principles and behavior: It's all for the best. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 4:395–96. [SEGL]Google Scholar
Hursh, S. R. (1978) The economics of daily consumption controlling food- and water-reinforced responding. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior 29:475–91. [SRH]Google Scholar
Hursh, S. R. (1980) Economic concepts for the analysis of behavior. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior 34:219–38. [SRH]Google Scholar
Hursh, S. R. & Natelson, B. J. (1981) Brain stimulation and food reinforcement dissociated by demand elasticity. Physiology and Behavior, in press. [SRH]Google Scholar
Killeen, P. R. & Allen, C. M. (1981) Maximization theory: The “package” will not serve as an atom. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 4:397–98. [PTPW]Google Scholar
Krebs, J. R. & Davies, N. B., eds. (1978) Behavioral ecology: An evolutionary approach. Blackwell. [BS]Google Scholar
Kuhn, T. S. (1962) The structure of scientific revolutions. University of Chicago Press. [SEGL]Google Scholar
Lancaster, K. (1966) A new approach to consumer theory. Journal of Political Economy 74:132–57. [SEGL, HR’Google Scholar
Lea, S.E.G. (1981) Concurrent ratio schedules of different reinforcers: A general theory. In: Quantification of steady-state operant behaviour, ed. Bradshaw, C. M., Szabadi, E. & Lowe, C. F., pp. 101–12. Elsevier. [SEGL]Google Scholar
Lea, S.E.G. & Roper, T. J. (1977) Demand for food on fixed-ratio schedules as a function of the quality of concurrently available reinforcement. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior 27:371–80. [SRH]Google Scholar
Lepper, M. R. & Greene, D., eds. (1978) The hidden costs of reward. Erlbaum. [BS]Google Scholar
Leslie, J. C. (1981) Is operant conditioning ready for formal molar theories? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 4:398. [PTPW]Google Scholar
Lovaas, O. I. & Bucker, B. D., eds. (1974) Perspective in behavior modification with deviant children. Prentice-Hall. [PTPW]Google Scholar
Polanyi, K. (1944) The great transformation. Rinehart. [BS]Google Scholar
Premack, D. (1965) Reinforcement theory. In: Nebraska symposium on motivation, vol. 13, ed. Livine, D.. University of Nebraska Press. [SRH]Google Scholar
Pyk, G. H., Pulliam, H. R. & Charnov, E. L. (1977) Optimal foraging: A selective review of theory and tests. Quarterly Review of Biology 52:137–54. [PTPW]Google Scholar
Rachlin, H. (1978) A molar theory of reinforcement schedules. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior 30:345–60. [HR]Google Scholar
Rachlin, H. (1981) Absolute and relative consumption space. In: Nebraska symposium on motivation. vol. 29, ed. Howe, H. E. & Bernstein, D. J.. University of Nebraska Press. [HR]Google Scholar
Rachlin, H., Battalio, R., Kagel, J. & Green, L. (1981a) Maximization theory in behavioral psychology. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 4:371–88. [ACC, JG, GMH, SRH, SEGL, BS, PTPW]Google Scholar
Rachlin, H., Battalio, R., Kagel, J. & Green, L. (1981b) Maximization theory vindicated. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 4:405–14. [GMH, SRH, SEGL, HR, PTPW]Google Scholar
Rachlin, H. & Burkhard, B. (1978) The temporal triangle: Response substitutability in instrumental conditioning. Psychological Review 85:22–48. [SEGL]Google Scholar
Raclilin, H., Green, L., Kagel, H. H. & Battalio, R. C. (1976) Economic demamid theory and psychological studies of choice. In: The psychology of learning and motivation, vol. 10, ed. Bower, G. H.. Academic Press. [BS]Google Scholar
Rachlin, H., Kagel, J. H. & Battalio, R. C. (1980) Substitutability in time allocation. Psychological Review 87:355–74. [SEGL]Google Scholar
Rowland, N. (1981) Deprivation and maximization: Mixed feelings about Tom Collins et al. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 4:402. [PTPW]Google Scholar
Sack, R. L. & Miller, W. (1975) Masochism: A clinical and theoretical overview. Psychiatry 38:244–57. [PTPW]CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sahlins, M. (1977) The use and abuse of biology. University of Michigan Press. [BS]Google Scholar
Samuelson, P. A. (1972) Complementarity. Journal of Economic Literature 12:1255–89. [SEGL]Google Scholar
Schwartz, B., Schuldenfrei, R. & Lacey, H. (1978) Operant psychology as factory psychology. Behaviorism 6:229–54. [BS]Google Scholar
Staddon, J.E.R. (1979) Operant behavior as adaptation to constraint. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 108:48–67. [SEGL, HR]Google Scholar
Staddon, J.E.R. & Simmelhag, V. L. (1971) The “superstition” experiment: A reexamination of its implications for the principles of adaptive behavior. Psychological Review 78:15–43. [HR]Google Scholar
Stubbs, D. A. & Pliskoff, S. S. (1969) Concurrent responding with fixed relative rate of reinforcement. Journal of time Experimental Analysis of Behavior 12:887–95. [GMH, HR]Google Scholar
Thaler, R. H. (1981) Maximization and self-control. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 4:403–4. [PTPW]Google Scholar
Timberlake, W. (1980) A molar equilibrium theory of learned performance. In: The psychology of learning and motivation, vol. 14, ed. Bower, G. H., pp. 1–58. Academic Press. [PTPW]Google Scholar
Timberlake, W. (1981) Bliss points and utility functions. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 4:404–5. [SEGL, PTPW]Google Scholar
Timberlake, W. & Allison, J. (1974) Response deprivation: An empirical approach to instrumental performance. Psychological Review 81:146–64. [SRH]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vaughan, W. Jr (1981) Reinforcement or maximnization. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 41:405. [GMH, PTPW]Google Scholar
Weiss, R. F., Boyer, J. L., Lombardo, J. P. & Stick, M. H. (1973) Altruistic drive and altruistic reinforcement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 25:390–400. [PTPW]Google Scholar
Wilson, E. O. (1975) Sociobiology: A new synthesis. Harvard University Press. [PTPW]Google Scholar
Wong, P.T. P. (1975) The concept of higher order operant: A preliminary analysis. Bulletin of the Psychonomnic Society 5:43–44. [PTPW]Google Scholar
Wong, P. T.P. (1977) Extinction facilitates acquisition of the higher order operant. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 9:131–34. [PTPW]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wong, P.T. P. (1978a) A behavioral field approach to instrumental learning in the rat: II. Training parameters and a stage model of extinction. Animal Learning and Behavior 6:82–93. [PTPW]Google Scholar
Wong, P.T. P. (1978b) A behavioral field approach to operant conditioning: Extinctiotsinduced sanddigging. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 12:203–6. [PTPW]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wong, P.T. P. (1979) A behavioral field approach to general activity: Sex differences and food deprivation in the rat. Animal Learning and Behavior 7:111–18. [PTPW]Google Scholar
Wright, S. (1980) Genie and organismal selection. Evolution 34:825–43. [BS]Google Scholar