Crossref Citations
This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by Crossref.
Morier, Dean M.
and
Borgida, Eugene
1984.
The Conjunction Fallacy.
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin,
Vol. 10,
Issue. 2,
p.
243.
Cheng, Patricia W
Holyoak, Keith J
Nisbett, Richard E
and
Oliver, Lindsay M
1986.
Pragmatic versus syntactic approaches to training deductive reasoning.
Cognitive Psychology,
Vol. 18,
Issue. 3,
p.
293.
Fong, Geoffrey T
Krantz, David H
and
Nisbett, Richard E
1986.
The effects of statistical training on thinking about everyday problems.
Cognitive Psychology,
Vol. 18,
Issue. 3,
p.
253.
Kunda, Ziva
and
Nisbett, Richard E
1986.
Prediction and the partial understanding of the law of large numbers.
Journal of Experimental Social Psychology,
Vol. 22,
Issue. 4,
p.
339.
Kunda, Ziva
and
Nisbett, Richard E
1986.
The psychometrics of everyday life.
Cognitive Psychology,
Vol. 18,
Issue. 2,
p.
195.
Van Der Pligt, Joop
1988.
Applied decision research and environmental policy.
Acta Psychologica,
Vol. 68,
Issue. 1-3,
p.
293.
Kruglanski, Arie W.
1990.
Vol. 68,
Issue. ,
p.
15.
Smith, Edward E.
Langston, Christopher
and
Nisbett, Richard E.
1992.
The Case for Rules in Reasoning.
Cognitive Science,
Vol. 16,
Issue. 1,
p.
1.
Shiloh, Shoshana
1994.
Applications of Heuristics and Biases to Social Issues.
Vol. 3,
Issue. ,
p.
13.
Bisanz, Jeffrey
Bisanz, Gay L.
and
Korpan, Connie A.
1994.
Thinking and Problem Solving.
p.
179.
Krueger, Joachim
1996.
Studying the use of base rates: Normal science or shifting paradigm?.
Behavioral and Brain Sciences,
Vol. 19,
Issue. 1,
p.
30.
Thomsen, Cynthia J.
and
Borgida, Eugene
1996.
Throwing out the baby with the bathwater? Let's not overstate the overselling of the base rate fallacy.
Behavioral and Brain Sciences,
Vol. 19,
Issue. 1,
p.
39.
Hamm, Robert M.
1996.
Physicians neglect base rates, and it matters.
Behavioral and Brain Sciences,
Vol. 19,
Issue. 1,
p.
25.
Spellman, Barbara A.
1996.
The implicit use of base rates in experiential and ecologically valid tasks.
Behavioral and Brain Sciences,
Vol. 19,
Issue. 1,
p.
38.
Ginzburg, Lev R.
Janson, Charles
and
Ferson, Scott
1996.
Judgment under uncertainty: Evolution may not favor a probabilistic calculus.
Behavioral and Brain Sciences,
Vol. 19,
Issue. 1,
p.
24.
Windschitl, Paul D.
and
Wells, Gary L.
1996.
Base rates do not constrain nonprobability judgments.
Behavioral and Brain Sciences,
Vol. 19,
Issue. 1,
p.
40.
Vicente, Kim J.
1996.
The perils of reconstructive remembering and the value of representative design.
Behavioral and Brain Sciences,
Vol. 19,
Issue. 1,
p.
40.
Keren, Gideon
and
Thijs, Lambert J.
1996.
The base rate controversy: Is the glass half-full or half-empty?.
Behavioral and Brain Sciences,
Vol. 19,
Issue. 1,
p.
26.
Callen, Craig R.
1996.
The implications of Koehler's approach for fact finding.
Behavioral and Brain Sciences,
Vol. 19,
Issue. 1,
p.
18.
McLeod, Peter J.
and
Watt, Margo
1996.
How are base rates used? Interactive and group effects.
Behavioral and Brain Sciences,
Vol. 19,
Issue. 1,
p.
35.
